Motor recovery following stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study

OBJECTIVES To verify the usefulness of early recording of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in predicting motor outcome after stroke and to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying functional recovery following stroke. METHODS We performed a comparative analysis of the behaviour of motor responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortex in the affected and unaffected thenar muscles of 21 consecutive patients with acute stroke. RESULTS According to the behaviour of MEPs in the affected muscles, patients could be divided into 3 groups: (a) 10 subjects with absent responses to TMS of both the damaged and undamaged hemisphere, whose motor recovery was poor and related to the size of MEPs on the normal side; (b) 5 subjects with larger MEPs upon TMS of the ipsilateral (undamaged) than of the contralateral (damaged) cortex, whose good recovery possibly resulted from the emergence of ipsilateral pathways; (c) 6 subjects with larger MEPs in the affected than in the unaffected muscles, whose good recovery was possibly subserved by alternative circuits taking over cortical deafferentation. CONCLUSIONS Early MEP recording in acute stroke provides useful information on the clinical prognosis and the different mechanisms of motor recovery.

[1]  B U Meyer,et al.  Technical approaches to hemisphere-selective transcranial magnetic brain stimulation. , 1990, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  M. Hallett,et al.  Involvement of the ipsilateral motor cortex in finger movements of different complexities , 1997, Annals of neurology.

[3]  J. Tanji,et al.  Neuronal activity in cortical motor areas related to ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral digit movements of the monkey. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: A study with positron emission tomography , 1991, Annals of neurology.

[5]  Edgar M. Housepian.  Atlas d'anatomie stereotaxique du telencephale. , 1968 .

[6]  P. Delwaide,et al.  Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? , 1996, Stroke.

[7]  P M Rossini,et al.  Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. , 1997, Stroke.

[8]  R N Lemon,et al.  Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  M. Schieppati,et al.  Comparison of intracortical inhibition and facilitation in distal and proximal arm muscles in humans , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  S. Miller,et al.  Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  R. Kandler,et al.  Clinical Value of Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke , 1991 .

[12]  A. Brodal,et al.  Self-observations and neuro-anatomical considerations after a stroke. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  G. Abbruzzese,et al.  Intracortical inhibition after paired transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on the current flow direction , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  E. Evarts.  Pyramidal tract activity associated with a conditioned hand movement in the monkey. , 1966, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  S. Miller,et al.  Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 1. Natural history of central motor conduction. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  R. Ratcheson,et al.  Human Motor Cortex: Sensory Input Data from Single Neuron Recordings , 1972, Science.

[17]  M. Lissens.  Clinical Applications of Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation. , 1992 .

[18]  C Ertekin,et al.  Prognostic Value of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Acute Stroke , 1994, Stroke.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man , 1992, Annals of neurology.

[20]  H. Kuypers,et al.  Cerebral control of contralateral and ipsilateral arm, hand and finger movements in the split-brain rhesus monkey. , 1973, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  G. Donnan,et al.  A comparison of somatosensory evoked and motor evoked potentials in stroke , 1989, Annals of neurology.

[22]  P Ashby,et al.  Ipsilateral fast corticospinal pathways do not account for recovery in stroke , 1992, Annals of neurology.

[23]  A Berardelli,et al.  Cortical and cervical stimulation after hemispheric infarction. , 1987, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[24]  A Schnitzler,et al.  The motor syndrome associated with exaggerated inhibition within the primary motor cortex of patients with hemiparetic. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  P M Rossini,et al.  Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2-4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  K. Stephan,et al.  Transcranial stimulation of motor cortex in upper motor neurone syndrome: its relation to the motor deficit. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  E Favale,et al.  Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in lacunar syndromes. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  V. Hömberg,et al.  Reorganization of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  G. Bernardi,et al.  Cerebral plasticity after stroke as revealed by ipsilateral responses to magnetic stimulation. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[30]  P. Bucy,et al.  IPSILATERAL REPRESENTATION IN THE MOTOR AND PREMOTOR CORTEX OP MONKEYS , 1933 .

[31]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  Involvement of the healthy hemisphere in recovery from aphasia and motor deficit in patients with cortical ischemic infarction , 1995, Neurology.

[32]  V. Hömberg,et al.  Intact conduction of fastest corticospinal efferents is not sufficient for normal voluntary muscle strength: Transcranial motor cortex stimulation in patients with tetraplegia , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[33]  R. A. Davidoff.  The pyramidal tract. , 1990, Neurology.

[34]  Jaume Marrugat,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a prognostic tool in stroke , 1997, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[35]  M. Dominkus,et al.  Transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials as a prognostic indicator for motor recovery in stroke patients. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[36]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the `affected' and `unaffected' hemispheres in human stroke , 1998, Brain Research.

[37]  J. Binder,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of complex human movements , 1993, Neurology.

[38]  P Noël,et al.  Magnetic transcranial stimulation in acute stroke: early excitation threshold and functional prognosis. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.