Public attitudes to the storage of blood left over from routine general practice tests and its use in research

Objective: There is increasing international interest in DNA biobanks but relatively little evidence concerning appropriate recruitment methods for these repositories of genetic information linked to patient-specific phenotypic data. To this end, our study aimed to investigate the attitudes of members of the public recruited through general practices to the donation and storage of blood left over from routine clinical tests in general practice. Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to 2600 individuals randomly selected from two general practice patient lists in Dundee, Scotland. Using a 7-point Likert scale, respondents rated their attitudes toward DNA biobanks in general, and procurement of blood samples specifically. Results: Overall, 841 (34%) of 2471 delivered questionnaires were returned. Compared with patients on the practice lists, respondents were older and more likely to be women. A majority of respondents (61%) were unequivocally positive about storing blood left over from routine tests. Despite general support for this collection method, when asked about open-ended consent, respondents expressed concern about future uses. Respondents’ increasing age and level of deprivation had significant adverse effects on attitudes towards making leftover routine biological samples available for research (P = 0.013 and P = 0.034, respectively). The study had three main limitations: there was a low response rate (34%) such that respondents were not entirely respresentative of the survey population; some respondents had difficulty with the questionnaire; and the study was somewhat underpowered for some comparisons. Conclusion: Despite its limitations, this first survey of a general practice population suggests that the majority would be willing to consider giving open-ended consent for the use of blood left over from routine clinical tests in general practice to be stored and used later for medical research.

[1]  R. Kington,et al.  Consent for genetic research in a general population: The NHANES experience , 2003, Genetics in Medicine.

[2]  B. Stegmayr,et al.  Informed consent for genetic research on blood stored for more than a decade: a population based study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Questions raised by a reasoned action approach: comment on Ogden (2003). , 2004, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[4]  J. Kegley.  Challenges to informed consent , 2004, EMBO reports.

[5]  J. Benkendorf,et al.  Consent to the use of stored DNA for genetics research: a survey of attitudes in the Jewish population. , 2001, American journal of medical genetics.

[6]  P. Catalano,et al.  High rate of consent to bank biologic samples for future research: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  M. Conner,et al.  Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[8]  K. Hoeyer,et al.  The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  M. Khoury,et al.  Public Attitudes regarding the Donation and Storage of Blood Specimens for Genetic Research , 2001, Public Health Genomics.

[10]  Jane Ogden,et al.  Some problems with social cognition models: a pragmatic and conceptual analysis. , 2003, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[11]  J. Savulescu,et al.  No consent should be needed for using leftover body material for scientific purposes , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Jörg Schmidtke,et al.  Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: informed consent, confidentiality, quality issues, ownership, return of benefits. A professional perspective , 2003, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[13]  L. Ring,et al.  Public perceptions of biomedical research: a survey of the general population in Ireland , 2005 .

[14]  Joakim Dillner,et al.  Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  K. Hoeyer,et al.  Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research , 2004, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[16]  S. Trent Rosenbloom,et al.  Research Paper: US and Scottish Health Professionals' Attitudes toward DNA Biobanking , 2008, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  C. Womack,et al.  Why surgical patients do not donate tissue for commercial research: review of records , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Bradley Malin,et al.  Determining the identifiability of DNA database entries , 2000, AMIA.

[19]  K. Maschke,et al.  Alternative consent approaches for biobank research. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[20]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Decisions to donate bone marrow: The role of attitudes and subjective norms across cultures , 2001 .

[21]  David Wendler,et al.  One-time general consent for research on biological samples , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  M. Goodson,et al.  A study of public opinion on the use of tissue samples from living subjects for clinical research , 2004, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[23]  L. Ring,et al.  Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? , 2006, European journal of public health.

[24]  Kwan-wa Lau,et al.  Willingness to donate blood samples for genetic research: a survey from a community in Singapore , 2003, Clinical genetics.

[25]  L. Ring,et al.  Perceptions of potential donors in the Swedish public towards information and consent procedures in relation to use of human tissue samples in biobanks: A population-based study , 2007, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[26]  Tsuguya Fukui,et al.  Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: Preliminary findings based on focus group interviews , 2002, BMC medical ethics.

[27]  M. Clarke,et al.  Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[28]  Karim Keshavjee,et al.  Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .