Gradient prosodic correlates of phrasing in French

In its modest scale, the present paper advances theoretical claims about the prosodic structure of French, and, at the same time, shows how far these claims are corroborated by empirical results. Crucially, the experiments presented below show that prosodic structure is sensitive to several factors and is subject to variation, and that, ultimately, the grammar of prosody is to be conceived in a way that takes variation into account. French uses a combination of segmental and tonal cues to signal prosodic phrases, and differs in this respect from a language like English, which relies almost exclusively on tonal boundaries (Pierrehumbert 1980, Gussenhoven 1984). This paper studies the segmental aspects of phrasing and largely ignores the tonal ones (see e.g. Di Cristo 1998, Di Cristo & Hirst 1996, Fery 2001, Fougeron & Jun 1998, Jun & Fougeron 1998 Mertens 1993 and Rossi 1980 for a review of the tonal correlates of phrasing in French). It reports the results of an experimental study of three segmental correlates of phrasing: obstruent voicing assimilation (OVA), nasal-obstruent simplification (NOS) and liaison. It is shown first that these processes regularly take place inside a prosodic domain of the size of a phonological phrase (PhP or simply P), but two of them obstruent voicing assimilation and nasal-obstruent simplification are blocked across PhP boundaries, at least when this boundary originates from the presence of narrow focus (see below).

[1]  Annie Rialland,et al.  Are There Cleft Sentences in French , 1999 .

[2]  Jacqueline Vaissière,et al.  Language-Independent Prosodic Features , 1983 .

[3]  P. Boersma How we learn variation, optionality and probalility , 1997 .

[4]  J. Pierrehumbert The phonology and phonetics of English intonation , 1987 .

[5]  Bernard Tranel,et al.  French final consonants and nonlinear phonology , 1995 .

[6]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Sentence accents and argument structure , 1992 .

[7]  P. Mertens,et al.  Intonational grouping, boundaries, and syntactic structure in French , 1993 .

[8]  C. Fougeron,et al.  Rate effects on French intonation: prosodic organization and phonetic realization , 1998 .

[9]  Pilar Prieto,et al.  The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian , 2005 .

[10]  Leon A. Jakobovits,et al.  Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology , 1971 .

[11]  E. Selkirk On derived domains in sentence phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[12]  Annie Rialland Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: The phonology and phonetics of extrasyllabicity in French , 1994 .

[13]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[14]  S. Goldinger THE ROLE OF PERCEPTUAL EPISODES IN LEXICAL PROCESSING , 2022 .

[15]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress and Phrasing , 1996 .

[16]  E. Engdahl,et al.  The linguistic realization of information packaging , 2013 .

[17]  Pierre R. Léon,et al.  L'accent en français contemporain , 1980 .

[18]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  On the Relation between Syntactic Phrases and Phonological Phrases , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[19]  Geert Booij,et al.  Yearbook of Morphology 1993 , 1993 .

[20]  Larry M. Hyman The Interaction between Focus and Tone in Bantu , 1999 .

[21]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation , 1969 .

[22]  Ellen M. Kaisse,et al.  The syntax of Xiamen tone sandhi , 1987, Phonology.

[23]  P. Keating Phonological structure and phonetic form , 1995 .

[24]  Vieri Samek-Lodovici,et al.  Prosody–Syntax Interaction in the Expression of Focus , 2005 .

[25]  K. Kiss Identificational focus versus information focus , 1998 .

[26]  Laurice Tuller,et al.  The grammar of focus , 1999 .

[27]  K Szendroi,et al.  A stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus , 2003 .

[28]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Prosody: Models and measurements , 1983 .

[29]  John Kingston,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Index of names , 1990 .

[30]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[31]  A. D. Dominicis,et al.  Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages , 1999 .

[32]  S. Frisch,et al.  Temporally organized lexical representations as phonological units , 1998 .

[33]  P. Boersma,et al.  Empirical Tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm , 2001, Linguistic Inquiry.

[34]  Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al.  Audiatur vox sapientiae : a Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow , 2001 .

[35]  Caroline Féry,et al.  Liaison and syllable structure in French , 2003 .

[36]  M. Rossi Le Français, langue sans accent? , 1980 .

[37]  Elisabeth Delais-Roussarie,et al.  Pour une approche parallèle de la structure prosodique : étude de l'organisation prosodique et rythmique de la phrase française , 1995 .