Distribution characteristics on droplet deposition of wind field vortex formed by multi-rotor UAV

When the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is used for aerial spraying, the downwash airflow generated by the UAV rotor will interact with the crop canopy and form a conical vortex shape in the crop plant. The size of the vortex will directly affect the outcome of the spraying operation. Six one-way spraying were performed by the UAV in a rice field with different but random flying altitude and velocities within the optimal operational range to form different vortex patterns. The spraying reagent was clear water, which was collected by water sensitive paper (WSP), and then the WSP was analyzed to study the droplets deposition effects in different vortex states. The results showed that the formation of the vortex significantly influenced the droplet deposition. To be specific, the droplet deposition amount in the obvious-vortex (OV) state was about 1.5 times of that in the small-scale (SV) vortex state, and 7 times of that in the non-vortex (NV) state. In the OV state, the droplets mainly deposited directly below and on both sides of the route. The deposition amount, coverage rate and droplet size increased from top to bottom of the crops with the deposition amount, coverage rate, and volume median diameter (VMD) ranging 0.204–0.470 μL/cm2, 3.31%-7.41%, and 306–367μm, respectively. In the SV state, droplets mainly deposited in the vortex area directly below the route. The deposition amount in the downwind direction was bigger than that in the upwind direction. The maximum of deposition amount, coverage rate and droplet size were found in the middle layer of the crops, the range are 0.177–0.334μL/cm2, 2.71%-5.30%, 295–370μm, respectively. In the NV state, the droplet mainly performed drifting motion, and the average droplet deposition amount in the downwind non-effective region was 29.4 times of that in the upwind non-effective region and 8.7 times of the effective vortex region directly below the route. The maximum of deposition amount, coverage rate and droplet size appeared in the upper layer of the crop, the range are 0.006–0.132μL/cm2, 0.17%-1.82%, 120–309μm, respectively, and almost no droplet deposited in the middle and lower part of the crop. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the droplet deposition amount was less than 40% in the state of obvious-vortex and small-scale vortex, and the worst penetration appeared in the non-vortex amounting to 65.97%. This work offers a basis for improving the spraying performance of UAV.

[1]  Yubin Lan,et al.  Current status and future trends of precision agricultural aviation technologies , 2017 .

[2]  Yubin Lan,et al.  Comparison of Spray Deposition, Control Efficacy on Wheat Aphids and Working Efficiency in the Wheat Field of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle with Boom Sprayer and Two Conventional Knapsack Sprayers , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[3]  He Xiongkui,et al.  Recent development of unmanned aerial vehicle for plant protection in East Asia , 2017 .

[4]  Liang Liang,et al.  Double-loop intelligent control based on gray ant combination prediction algorithm for biomass gasifies. , 2012 .

[5]  Yubin Lan,et al.  Current status and trends of plant protection UAV and its spraying technology in China , 2018 .

[6]  Zou Meng,et al.  Experiment of slope trafficability assessment of planetary rover under slip condition. , 2016 .

[7]  S. Robinson,et al.  Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People , 2010, Science.

[8]  Yubin Lan,et al.  Distribution law of rice pollen in the wind field of small UAV , 2017 .

[9]  Wang Ling,et al.  CFD Simulation of Low-attitude Droplets Deposition Characteristics for UAV based on Multi-feature Fusion , 2018 .

[10]  Jizhong Deng,et al.  A fully convolutional network for weed mapping of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery , 2018, PloS one.

[11]  Cen Haiyan,et al.  Research on deposition effect of droplets based on plant protection unmanned aerial vehicle: A review , 2018 .

[12]  G. Dorr,et al.  Droplet deposition distribution and off-target drift during pesticide spraying operation , 2017 .

[13]  Huihui Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of droplet deposition and effect of variable-rate application by a manned helicopter with AG-NAV Guía system , 2019 .

[14]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  Determining the Influence of Spray Quality, Nozzle Type, Spray Volume, and Air-Assisted Application Strategies on Deposition of Pesticides in Soybean Canopy , 2008 .

[15]  Zhaoxia Lou,et al.  Effect of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Flight Height on Droplet Distribution, Drift and Control of Cotton Aphids and Spider Mites , 2018, Agronomy.

[16]  Yubin Lan,et al.  Vertical distribution and vortex structure of rotor wind field under the influence of rice canopy , 2019, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[17]  Chen Liping,et al.  Droplets movement and deposition of an eight-rotor agricultural UAV in downwash flow field , 2017 .

[18]  Xin-Yu Xue,et al.  Droplet deposition and control effect of insecticides sprayed with an unmanned aerial vehicle against plant hoppers , 2016 .

[19]  Zhang Huihui,et al.  Drift and deposition of ultra-low altitude and low volume application in paddy field , 2014 .

[20]  Bradley K. Fritz,et al.  AERIAL APPLICATION METHODS FOR INCREASING SPRAY DEPOSITION ON WHEAT HEADS , 2006 .

[21]  Song Jianli,et al.  Influence of spraying parameters of unmanned aircraft on droplets deposition. , 2012 .

[22]  Yubin Lan,et al.  Effect of wind field below unmanned helicopter on droplet deposition distribution of aerial spraying , 2017 .

[23]  Lan Yubin,et al.  Effects of spraying parameters of small plant protection UAV on droplets deposition distribution in citrus canopy. , 2017 .

[24]  I. W. Kirk.  Measurement and Prediction of Atomization Parameters from Fixed-Wing Aircraft Spray Nozzles , 2007 .