Space and time in masking and crowding.

Masking and crowding are major phenomena associated with contextual modulations, but the relationship between them remains unclear. We have recently shown that crowding is apparent in the fovea when the time available for processing is limited, pointing to the strong relationship between crowding in the spatial and temporal domains. Models of crowding emphasize the size (acuity) of the target and the spacing between the target and flankers as the main determinants that predict crowding. Our model, which is based on lateral interactions, posits that masking and crowding are related in the spatial and temporal domains at the fovea and periphery and that both can be explained by the increasing size of the human perceptive field (PF) with increasing eccentricity. We explored the relations between masking and crowding using letter identification and contrast detection by correlating the crowding effect with the estimated size of the PF and with masking under different spatiotemporal conditions. We found that there is a large variability in PF size and crowding effects across observers. Nevertheless, masking and crowding were both correlated with the estimated size of the PF in the fovea and periphery under a specific range of spatiotemporal parameters. Our results suggest that under certain conditions, crowding and masking share common neural mechanisms that underlie the spatiotemporal properties of these phenomena in both the fovea and periphery. These results could explain the transfer of training gains from spatiotemporal Gabor masking to letter acuity, reading, and reduced crowding.

[1]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Visual masking : an integrative approach , 1984 .

[2]  Y. Yeshurun,et al.  Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[3]  S Marcelja,et al.  Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[4]  R F Hess,et al.  Relationship between facilitation at threshold and suprathreshold contour integration. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Patterns of excitation and inhibition evoked by horizontal connections in visual cortex share a common relationship to orientation columns , 1995, Neuron.

[6]  David Alais,et al.  The mechanisms of collinear integration. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[7]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Surround modulation in human vision unmasked by masking experiments , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  U. Polat,et al.  Response similarity as a basis for perceptual binding. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[9]  K Nakayama,et al.  Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. , 1979, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Uri Polat,et al.  Spatio-temporal low-level neural networks account for visual masking , 2008, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[11]  C. Tyler,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interaction fields of flankers revealed by contrast-masking functions. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[12]  Uri Polat,et al.  Training-induced recovery of low-level vision followed by mid-level perceptual improvements in developmental object and face agnosia , 2014, Developmental science.

[13]  R. Shapley,et al.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  U. Polat,et al.  Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold , 1998, Nature.

[15]  D. Sagi,et al.  Effects of spatial configuration on contrast detection , 1998, Vision Research.

[16]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Early perceptual loss in depression , 2007 .

[17]  Pieter R. Roelfsema,et al.  Different Processing Phases for Features, Figures, and Selective Attention in the Primary Visual Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[18]  Jean Bennett,et al.  Lateral Connectivity and Contextual Interactions in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 2002, Neuron.

[19]  Uri Polat,et al.  Treatment of children with amblyopia by perceptual learning , 2009, Vision Research.

[20]  V. M. Bondarko,et al.  Foveal contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[21]  J. Movshon,et al.  Time Course and Time-Distance Relationships for Surround Suppression in Macaque V1 Neurons , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Uri Polat,et al.  The relationship between the subjective and objective aspects of visual filling-in , 2007, Vision Research.

[23]  Uri Polat,et al.  Training the brain to overcome the effect of aging on the human eye , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Y. Trotter,et al.  The effect of spatial frequency on peripheral collinear facilitation , 2015, Vision Research.

[25]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Reducing Crowding by Weakening Inhibitory Lateral Interactions in the Periphery with Perceptual Learning , 2011, PloS one.

[26]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[27]  Daniel R. Coates,et al.  Contour interaction in foveal vision: A response to Siderov, Waugh, and Bedell (2013) , 2014, Vision Research.

[28]  U. Polat,et al.  What pattern the eye sees best , 1999, Vision Research.

[29]  Hamutal Slovin,et al.  Population response to contextual influences in the primary visual cortex. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  J. Stephen Mansfield,et al.  Contrast polarity differences reduce crowding but do not benefit reading performance in peripheral vision , 2009, Vision Research.

[31]  G Francis,et al.  Quantitative theories of metacontrast masking. , 2000, Psychological review.

[32]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Spatial distribution of contextual interactions in primary visual cortex and in visual perception. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  Roelfsema Pieter.  Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping , 2008 .

[34]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Multiple levels of orientation anisotropy in crowding with Gabor flankers. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[36]  M Stemmler,et al.  Lateral interactions in primary visual cortex: a model bridging physiology and psychophysics. , 1995, Science.

[37]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[38]  C. Tyler,et al.  Lateral modulation of contrast discrimination: flanker orientation effects. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[39]  M C FLOM,et al.  VISUAL RESOLUTION AND CONTOUR INTERACTION. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[40]  U. Polat.  Functional architecture of long-range perceptual interactions. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[41]  Uri Polat,et al.  Uncovering foveal crowding? , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[42]  U. Polat,et al.  Major Depression Affects Perceptual Filling-In , 2008, Biological Psychiatry.

[43]  A. Norcia,et al.  Spatial frequency sweep VEP: Visual acuity during the first year of life , 1985, Vision Research.

[44]  S. Waugh,et al.  Foveal contour interaction for low contrast acuity targets , 2013, Vision Research.

[45]  Uri Polat,et al.  Training on spatiotemporal masking improves crowded and uncrowded visual acuity. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[46]  M. Morgan,et al.  Facilitation from collinear flanks is cancelled by non-collinear flanks , 2000, Vision Research.

[47]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  U Polat,et al.  Facilitation and suppression of single striate-cell activity by spatially discrete pattern stimuli presented beyond the receptive field , 2001, Visual Neuroscience.

[49]  A. Watson.  Summation of grating patches indicates many types of detector at one retinal location , 1982, Vision Research.

[50]  U. Polat,et al.  Spatial and temporal crowding in amblyopia , 2004, Vision Research.

[51]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in foveal vision: foveal crowding is simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[52]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  What does the eye see best? , 1983, Nature.

[53]  D. Levi,et al.  Receptive versus perceptive fields from the reverse-correlation viewpoint , 2006, Vision Research.

[54]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Effects of grouping in contextual modulation , 2002, Nature.

[55]  Jon Driver,et al.  Lateral interactions between targets and flankers in low-level vision depend on attention to the flankers , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  M. Herzog,et al.  When crowding of crowding leads to uncrowding. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[57]  Mark W. Cannon,et al.  Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: Inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations , 1991, Vision Research.

[58]  Michael Belkin,et al.  Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  U. Polat,et al.  Excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex does not affect perceptual filling-in in healthy volunteers , 2011, Vision Research.

[60]  Yaffa Yeshurun,et al.  Contrast dissimilarity effects on crowding are not simply another case of target saliency. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[61]  Charles D. Gilbert,et al.  The Role of Horizontal Connections in Generating Long Receptive Fields in the Cat Visual Cortex , 1989, The European journal of neuroscience.

[62]  Hans Strasburger,et al.  Source confusion is a major cause of crowding. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[63]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[64]  G Westheimer,et al.  Dynamics of spatial summation in primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[66]  D. Levi.  Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review , 2008, Vision Research.

[67]  T. S. Lee,et al.  Gestalten of Today: Early Processing of Visual Contours and Surfaces , 1996 .

[68]  U. Eysel,et al.  Orientation-specific relationship between populations of excitatory and inhibitory lateral connections in the visual cortex of the cat. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[69]  Branka Spehar,et al.  Dynamics of collinear contrast facilitation are consistent with long-range horizontal striate transmission , 2005, Vision Research.

[70]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[71]  J A Solomon,et al.  Texture interactions determine perceived contrast , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[73]  Cong Yu,et al.  Perceptual learning in contrast discrimination and the (minimal) role of context. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[74]  Uri Polat,et al.  Making perceptual learning practical to improve visual functions , 2009, Vision Research.

[75]  Anthony M. Norcia,et al.  Measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity with the swept contrast VEP , 1989, Vision Research.

[76]  D. Sagi,et al.  Recurrent networks in human visual cortex: psychophysical evidence. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[77]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[78]  U Polat,et al.  Spatial interactions in human vision: from near to far via experience-dependent cascades of connections. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[79]  Mylène C. Q. Farias,et al.  Detection of Gabor patterns of different sizes, shapes, phases and eccentricities , 2007, Vision Research.

[80]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[81]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Recovery of a crowded object by masking the flankers: determining the locus of feature integration. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[82]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Synaptic physiology of horizontal connections in the cat's visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[83]  Eli Peli,et al.  Facilitation of contrast detection in near-peripheral vision , 2004, Vision Research.

[84]  Robert O. Duncan,et al.  Cortical Magnification within Human Primary Visual Cortex Correlates with Acuity Thresholds , 2003, Neuron.

[85]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  Temporal and spatial interference with vernier acuity , 1975, Vision Research.

[86]  Peter Neri,et al.  Temporal dynamics of figure-ground segregation in human vision. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[87]  C. Koch,et al.  Flanker effects in peripheral contrast discrimination—psychophysics and modeling , 2001, Vision Research.

[88]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[89]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[90]  Saumil S. Patel,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of the Crowding Mechanism , 2011 .

[91]  Uri Polat,et al.  Backward masking suppresses collinear facilitation in the visual cortex , 2009, Vision Research.

[92]  D. Pelli,et al.  The same binding in contour integration and crowding. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[93]  U. Polat,et al.  Contrast response characteristics of long-range lateral interactions in cat striate cortex , 2001, Neuroreport.

[94]  Uri Polat,et al.  Collinear facilitation and suppression at the periphery , 2011, Vision Research.

[95]  E. Peli,et al.  Lateral interactions: size does matter , 2002, Vision Research.

[96]  Toni P Saarela,et al.  Time-course and surround modulation of contrast masking in human vision. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[97]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[98]  R. Vautin,et al.  Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[99]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of flankers on three tasks in central, peripheral, and amblyopic vision. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[100]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  The spatial extent over which neurons in macaque striate cortex pool visual signals , 2002, Visual Neuroscience.

[101]  J. Movshon,et al.  Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[102]  D. Sagi,et al.  Isolating Excitatory and Inhibitory Nonlinear Spatial Interactions Involved in Contrast Detection * * Part of this paper was presented at the 17th ECVP conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (September 1994). , 1996, Vision Research.

[103]  U. Polat,et al.  The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions , 1994, Vision Research.

[104]  Philipp Sterzer,et al.  Training improves visual processing speed and generalizes to untrained functions , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[105]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Crowding is reduced by onset transients in the target object (but not in the flankers). , 2014, Journal of vision.

[106]  R. Frostig,et al.  Cortical point-spread function and long-range lateral interactions revealed by real-time optical imaging of macaque monkey primary visual cortex , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[107]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Large crowding zones in peripheral vision for briefly presented stimuli. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[108]  D. Sagi,et al.  Excitatory-inhibitory network in the visual cortex: psychophysical evidence. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[109]  D. Pelli,et al.  The uncrowded window of object recognition , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[110]  B Winn,et al.  Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[111]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Top-down influences on visual processing , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[112]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Striate cortex of monkey and cat: contrast response function. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[113]  Bilge Sayim,et al.  Grouping, pooling, and when bigger is better in visual crowding. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[114]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex , 1997, nature.

[115]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[116]  Daniel R. Coates,et al.  Factors Affecting Crowded Acuity: Eccentricity and Contrast , 2013, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[117]  T. Kasamatsu,et al.  Collinear facilitation is independent of receptive-field expansion at low contrast , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[118]  D. Fitzpatrick.  Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[119]  R. Hess,et al.  The dynamics of collinear facilitation: Fast but sustained , 2008, Vision Research.

[120]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia , 1985, Vision Research.

[121]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Eccentricity effects on lateral interactions , 2005, Vision Research.

[122]  Gerald Westheimer,et al.  Grouping of contextual elements that affect vernier thresholds. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[123]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Spatiotemporal mechanisms for detecting and identifying image features in human vision , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[124]  U. Polat,et al.  Neurophysiological Evidence for Contrast Dependent Long-range Facilitation and Suppression in the Human Visual Cortex , 1996, Vision Research.

[125]  U. Polat.  Effect of spatial frequency on collinear facilitation. , 2009, Spatial vision.

[126]  Victor A. F. Lamme.  The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[127]  J. Movshon,et al.  Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[128]  J. Enns,et al.  What’s new in visual masking? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.