Can a mature resource-based industry become high-tech? Transformations of sectoral innovation systems in upstream petroleum industry

This article analyzes the transformation of sectoral innovation systems in upstream petroleum industry and its drivers. The evidence collected shows that this sector has experienced three distinctive phases since the early 1970s over which both upstream industry architecture and innovation systems have changed in configuration and performance. This study shows that the major driver behind transition from the first to the second period was collapse of oil prices. However, the major factor behind transition from the second to the third period was emergence of ‘qualitatively’ different demand for complex upstream projects in harsh and less accessible environments which drove innovation opportunities and pushed emergence of integrated service companies. In contrast to the conventional industry life cycle model, this study shows that a mature and established industry can transform to a high-tech sector, when major agents in the sector actively participate in the innovation system to meet the new technical requirements. It also shows transformation of sectoral innovation systems can be analyzed in terms of interaction between changes in architectural changes and innovation dynamics.

[1]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[2]  Marie N. Fagan Resource Depletion and Technical Change: Effects on U.S. Crude Oil Finding Costs from 1977 to 1994 , 1997 .

[3]  Ali Maleki,et al.  Dynamics of knowledge base complexity : an inquiry into oil producing countries' struggle to build innovation capabilities , 2013 .

[4]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[5]  F. Malerba Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[6]  J. Fred Weston,et al.  Mergers and restructuring in the world oil industry , 1999 .

[7]  C. Freeman Technology policy and economic performance : lessons from Japan , 1987 .

[8]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Sectoral Systems: How and Why Innovation Differs across Sectors , 2006 .

[9]  M. Isabelle Differentiated technological regimes and changing industrial organisation: Theory and evidence from the upstream oil and gas industry , 2001 .

[10]  Amin Naseri Mohammad Reza,et al.  PRIORITY SETTING FOR NANOTECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS FOR UPSTREAM OIL INDUSTRIES OF IRAN , 2008 .

[11]  R. Nelson Recent Evolutionary Theorizing about Economic Change , 2005, Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth.

[12]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[13]  S. Klepper Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[14]  Gavin J. Wright,et al.  The Myth of the Resource Curse , 2004 .

[15]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[16]  B. Lundvall National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[17]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[18]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[19]  M. Jacobides,et al.  Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures , 2006 .

[20]  S. Barreau,et al.  Innovations and External Growth Strategy: the Case of Oil and Gas Supply and Service Companies , 2002 .

[21]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[22]  F. Malerba Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors , 2005 .

[23]  Diana L. Moss,et al.  Technological Change, Depletion and the U.S. Petroleum Industry , 2001 .

[24]  D. Babusiaux,et al.  Oil and gas exploration and production : reserves, costs, contracts , 2011 .

[25]  Paul Stevens,et al.  Resource Impact: Curse or Blessing? A Literature Survey , 2003 .

[26]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[27]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[28]  Rafael Sandrea,et al.  Exploration trends show continued promise in world's offshore basins , 2007 .

[29]  M. Jacobides,et al.  Strategic dynamics in industry architectures and the challenges of knowledge integration , 2009 .

[30]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[31]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems , 2005, Scientometrics.

[32]  F. Malerba Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe , 2009 .

[33]  M. Trevor Technology Policy and Economic Performance. Lessons from Japan , 1989 .

[34]  C. Edquist Sectoral Innovation Systems: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries , 2013 .

[35]  Robert R. Stewart,et al.  What drives innovation in the upstream hydrocarbon industry , 2005 .

[36]  Dalton Boutte The role of technology in shaping the future of the E&P industry , 2004 .