Evaluation of the MicroSeq System for Identification of Mycobacteria by 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequencing and Its Integration into a Routine Clinical Mycobacteriology Laboratory

ABSTRACT An evaluation of the MicroSeq 500 microbial identification system by nucleic acid sequencing and the Mayo Clinic experience with its integration into a routine clinical laboratory setting are described. Evaluation of the MicroSeq 500 microbial identification system was accomplished with 59 American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains and 328 clinical isolates of mycobacteria identified by conventional and 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing by using the MicroSeq 500 microbial identification system. Nucleic acid sequencing identified 58 of 59 (98.3%) ATCC strains to the species level or to the correct group or complex level. The identification results for 219 of 243 clinical isolates (90.1%) with a distance score of <1% were concordant with the identifications made by phenotypic methods. The remaining 85 isolates had distance scores of >1%; 35 (41.1%) were identified to the appropriate species level or group or complex level; 13 (15.3%) were identified to the species level. All 85 isolates were determined to be mycobacterial species, either novel species or species that exhibited significant genotypic divergence from an organism in the database with the closest match. Integration of nucleic acid sequencing into the routine mycobacteriology laboratory and use of the MicroSeq 500 microbial identification system and Mayo Clinic databases containing additional genotypes of common species and added species significantly reduced the number of organisms that could not be identified by phenotypic methods. The turnaround time was shortened to 24 h, and results were reported much earlier. A limited number of species could not be differentiated from one another by 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing; however, the method provides for the identification of unusual species and more accurate identifications and offers the promise of being the most accurate method available.

[1]  K. Carroll,et al.  Identification of Mycobacterium spp. by Using a Commercial 16S Ribosomal DNA Sequencing Kit and Additional Sequencing Libraries , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[2]  M. Steinbakk,et al.  Identification of Clinical isolates of Mycobacterium spp. by sequence analysis of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene , 1999, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[3]  B. Petrini,et al.  Identification of Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria: 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Analysis vs. Conventional Methods , 2000, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.

[4]  E. Böttger,et al.  Differentiation of Mycobacterium species by direct sequencing of amplified DNA. , 1990, Journal of general microbiology.

[5]  Nalin Rastogi,et al.  Burden of Unidentifiable Mycobacteria in a Reference Laboratory , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[6]  J. Montoya-Burgos,et al.  Mycobacterium doricum sp. nov. , 2001, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[7]  J. Musser,et al.  Sequence-Based Identification ofMycobacterium Species Using the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA Bacterial Identification System , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  J. T. Crawford,et al.  Mycobacterium kubicae sp. nov., a slowly growing, scotochromogenic Mycobacterium. , 2000, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[9]  R. Wallace,,et al.  PCR amplification and restriction endonuclease analysis of a 65-kilodalton heat shock protein gene sequence for taxonomic separation of rapidly growing mycobacteria , 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[10]  S. Clarke,et al.  What a Load of Old Sequence!!! , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[11]  E. Böttger,et al.  Two-laboratory collaborative study on identification of mycobacteria: molecular versus phenotypic methods , 1996, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[12]  W. Ludwig,et al.  Differentiation of Phylogenetically Related Slowly Growing Mycobacteria Based on 16S-23S rRNA Gene Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequences , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  H. Kasai,et al.  Differentiation of Phylogenetically Related Slowly Growing Mycobacteria by Their gyrB Sequences , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[14]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Necessity of Quality-Controlled 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Databases: Identifying Nontuberculous Mycobacterium Species , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[15]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Evaluation of recA Sequences for Identification of Mycobacterium Species , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  E. Tortoli,et al.  Identification of 54 Mycobacterial Species by PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis of the hsp65Gene , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[17]  E. Böttger,et al.  Genotypic identification of mycobacteria by nucleic acid sequence determination: report of a 2-year experience in a clinical laboratory , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[18]  F. Witebsky,et al.  Identification of mycobacteria by conventional methods. , 1996, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[19]  Frank,et al.  Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[20]  P. Berche,et al.  hsp65 Sequencing for Identification of Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[21]  Jürgen Albert,et al.  Intuitive hypertext-based molecular identification of micro-organisms , 1999, The Lancet.

[22]  E. Böttger,et al.  Methods for the rapid identification of mycobacterial species. , 1996, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[23]  Nagwa M. El Amin, Hanna-Stina Hanson, Berit Petter Identification of Non-tuberculous Mycobacteria: 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Analysis vs. Conventional Methods , 2000 .