Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia).

Humans (Homo sapiens) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) were tested for memory of upright and inverted primate faces. Working memory was tested in Experiment 1 with a delayed matching-to-sample procedure, and reference memory was examined in Experiment 2 by requiring subjects to learn to discriminate between successive pairs of upright or inverted pictures. Both human and monkey subjects showed better working memory for upright than for inverted human faces and better reference memory for upright than for inverted human and great ape faces. In Experiment 3, reference memory tests with pigeons (Columba livia) showed no effects of inversion on rate of learning with face pictures. We argue that these findings cannot be explained easily by an individual primate's lifetime experiences with primate faces. We suggest that similar evolved mechanisms for primate face recognition in people and monkeys are responsible for the pattern of data reported.

[1]  G. V. Hoesen,et al.  Face recognition in the rhesus monkey , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  A. Young,et al.  ARE FACES SPECIAL , 1989 .

[3]  James L. Gould,et al.  Natural History of Honey Bee Learning , 1984 .

[4]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[5]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition , 1993 .

[6]  S. Levine.  THE QUESTION OF FACES: SPECIAL IS IN THE BRAIN OF THE BEHOLDER , 1989 .

[7]  C. Bruce,et al.  Face recognition by monkeys: Absence of an inversion effect , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  W. Roberts,et al.  Concept learning at different levels of abstraction by pigeons, monkeys, and people. , 1988 .

[9]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. , 1991, Psychological review.

[10]  H. Ellis,et al.  Perceiving and remembering faces , 1983 .

[11]  Thomas R. Zentall,et al.  Animal cognition : a tribute to Donald A. Riley , 1993 .

[12]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[13]  Michael Kubovy,et al.  Caricature and face recognition , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Sharon L. Greene,et al.  Pigeon visual memory capacity. , 1984 .

[15]  A. Young,et al.  Handbook of Research on Face Processing , 1989 .

[16]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  FOUR WAYS FOR FACES TO BE ‘SPECIAL’ , 1989 .

[17]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Cognitive Aspects of Stimulus Control , 2018 .

[18]  P. Marler.  Song Learning: Innate Species Differences in the Learning Process , 1984 .

[19]  T. Valentine.  Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[20]  J. Sergent.  STRUCTURAL PROCESSING OF FACES , 1989 .

[21]  Edward A. Wasserman,et al.  Conceptual Behavior in Pigeons: Categorization of Both Familiar and Novel Examples From Four Classes of Natural and Artificial Stimuli , 1988 .

[22]  J. Sergent.  An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[23]  J. L. Gould,et al.  Ethology and the Natural History of Learning , 1984 .

[24]  T. Valentine.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[25]  H. Terrace,et al.  The Biology of Learning , 1984, Dahlem Workshop Reports.

[26]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[27]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986 .

[28]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: Evidence from single unit and reaction time studies , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[29]  Robert W. Doty,et al.  Hemispheric specialization displayed by man but not macaques for analysis of faces , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  R. Yin,et al.  Face recognition by brain-injured patients: a dissociable ability? , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  T Valentine,et al.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[32]  R. Desimone.  Face-Selective Cells in the Temporal Cortex of Monkeys , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories. , 1988 .