Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds.

This study explores the effects of informational redundancy, as carried by a word's morphological paradigmatic structure, on acoustic duration in read aloud speech. The hypothesis that the more predictable a linguistic unit is, the less salient its realization, was tested on the basis of the acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds in two datasets: One for the interfix -s- (1155 tokens) and one for the interfix -e(n)- (742 tokens). Both datasets show that the more probable the interfix is, given the compound and its constituents, the longer it is realized. These findings run counter to the predictions of information-theoretical approaches and can be resolved by the Paradigmatic Signal Enhancement Hypothesis. This hypothesis argues that whenever selection of an element from alternatives is probabilistic, the element's duration is predicted by the amount of paradigmatic support for the element: The most likely alternative in the paradigm of selection is realized longer.

[1]  Nelleke Oostdijk,et al.  The Spoken Dutch Corpus Project , 1999 .

[2]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[4]  B. Munson,et al.  The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[5]  Arthur G. Samuel,et al.  Articulation Quality Is Inversely Related to Redundancy When Children or Adults Have Verbal Control , 1998 .

[6]  R. Baayen,et al.  Linking Elements in Dutch Noun–Noun Compounds: Constituent Families as Analogical Predictors for Response Latencies , 2002, Brain and Language.

[7]  Don L. Scarborough,et al.  Frequency and Repetition Effects in Lexical Memory. , 1977 .

[8]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Louis C. W. Pols,et al.  Information structure and efficiency in speech production , 2003, INTERSPEECH.

[10]  J. Hyönä,et al.  The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds , 2003 .

[11]  Geert Booij,et al.  The Morphology of Dutch , 2002 .

[12]  R. Baayen,et al.  Predicting the Unpredictable: Interpreting Neutralized Segments in Dutch , 2003 .

[13]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Diana Binnenpoorte,et al.  The IFA corpus: a phonemically segmented dutch "open source" speech database , 2001, INTERSPEECH.

[15]  J. Hay Causes and Consequences of Word Structure , 2003 .

[16]  F. Saussure,et al.  Course in General Linguistics , 1960 .

[17]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[18]  Jan P. H. van Santen,et al.  Duration and spectral balance of intervocalic consonants: A case for efficient communication , 2005, Speech Commun..

[19]  B. Hayes,et al.  Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study , 2003, Cognition.

[20]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  The Processing and Representation of Dutch and English Compounds: Peripheral Morphological and Central Orthographic Effects , 2002, Brain and Language.

[21]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[22]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production , 2008 .

[23]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Analogical hierarchy: Exemplar-based modeling of linkers in Dutch noun-noun compounds , 2002 .

[24]  D. Balota,et al.  Repetition and Associative Context Effects in Speech Production , 1991, Language and speech.

[25]  Sharon Hunnicutt,et al.  Intelligibility Versus Redundancy - Conditions of Dependency , 1985 .

[26]  A. Cohen,et al.  On the Complex Regulating the Voiced-Voiceless Distinction II , 1969, Language and speech.

[27]  Anneke Neijt,et al.  Rhythm and semantics in the selection of linking elements , 2002 .

[28]  Alice Turk,et al.  The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech , 2004, Language and speech.

[29]  Jean-Pierre Martens,et al.  Automatic segmentation and labelling of multi-lingual speech data , 1996, Speech Commun..

[30]  T. Crystal,et al.  Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  A. Cohen,et al.  On the Complex Regulating the Voiced-Voiceless Distinction I , 1969, Language and speech.

[32]  R. Baayen,et al.  Frequency effects in compound production. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  R. Baayen,et al.  Putting the bits together: an information theoretical perspective on morphological processing , 2004, Cognition.

[34]  Andrea Krott,et al.  Semantic Influence on Linkers in Dutch Noun-Noun Compounds , 2002 .

[35]  E. Bard,et al.  Controlling the Intelligibility of Referring Expressions in Dialogue , 2000 .

[36]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Variation in Dutch: From written MOGELIJK to spoken MOK , 2005 .

[37]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  The functionality of incomplete neutralization in Dutch: The case of past-tense formation , 2006 .

[38]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch , 2004 .

[39]  Eric Fosler-Lussier,et al.  Effects of speaking rate and word frequency on pronunciations in convertional speech , 1999, Speech Commun..

[40]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Lexical frequency and voice assimilation. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  G. M. Cambier Langeveld,et al.  Temporal Marking of Accents and Boundaries , 2000 .

[42]  Keith Johnson Massive reduction in conversational American English , 2004 .

[43]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[44]  Dan Jurafsky,et al.  Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  P. Lieberman Some Effects of Semantic and Grammatical Context on the Production and Perception of Speech , 1963 .

[46]  Kathryn Mason,et al.  Word Duration in Monologue and Dialogue Speech , 1994 .

[47]  Andrea Krott,et al.  Sublexical units and supralexical combinatorics in the processing of interfixed Dutch compounds , 2004 .

[48]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Articulatory Planning Is Continuous and Sensitive to Informational Redundancy , 2005, Phonetica.

[49]  M. Ernestus Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch. A Corpus-based Study of the Phonology-phonetics Interface , 2000 .

[50]  P. Ladefoged A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[51]  M. Aylett,et al.  Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  C. Cucchiarini,et al.  Phonetic transcription: a methodological and empirical study , 1993 .

[53]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  A. Friederici,et al.  Morphosyntax, Prosody, and Linking Elements: The Auditory Processing of German Nominal Compounds , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[56]  Beth L. Losiewicz The effect of frequency on linguistic morphology , 1992 .

[57]  C. Fowler,et al.  Talkers' signaling of new and old. words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction , 1987 .

[58]  Helmer Strik,et al.  Lower WERs do not guarantee better transcriptions , 2001, INTERSPEECH.

[59]  R. Baayen,et al.  Analogy in morphology: modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch , 2001 .

[60]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Relative Frequency as a Determinant of Phonetic Change , 1930 .