Design of optimal ecosystem monitoring networks: hotspot detection and biodiversity patterns

Effective monitoring of ecosystems is crucial for assessing and possibly anticipating shifts, quantifying ecosystem services, and optimal decision making based on shifts and services. The selection of monitoring sites is typically suboptimal following local stakeholder or research interests that do not allow to capture ecosystem patterns and dynamics as a whole. The design of optimal monitoring network is crucial for the accurate determination of biodiversity patterns of ecosystems. A novel model for the design of optimal monitoring networks for biodiversity based on the concept of the value of information (VoI) is proposed. The VoI is assigned to species richness that is the economically and ecologically valuable metric. As a case study the trinational frontier ecosystem among Brazil, Peru, and Bolivia is considered for the model. A multiresolution texture-based model estimates species richness and turnover on satellite imagery calibrated on different sets of information coming from forest plot data organized in network topologies. The optimal monitoring network is the network that minimizes the integrated VoI defined as the variation of the VoI in the 28 years considered. This is equivalent to minimize the sum of the species turnover of the ecosystem. The small world network is identified as the optimal and most resilient monitoring network whose nodes are the hotspots of species richness. The hotspots are identified as the sites whose VoI is the highest for the whole period considered. Hence, the hotspots are the most valuable communities for inferring biodiversity patterns and the most ecologically/economically valuable according to the richness—resilience hypothesis. Most hotspots are honored by the small world network that can be thought as the ”backbone” ecological network of the ecosystem. The small world monitoring network has an accuracy ~50 % higher than other network topologies in predicting biodiversity patterns. This network has the highest VoI at any time step and scale considered; thus, it guarantees to track changes of ecosystems in space and time. The network that results from the optimal trade-off between data value with their uncertainty and relevance, has deep implications for understanding ecosystem function and for management decisions. The model allows to include preferences for ecosystem communities by using differential weights on the VoI of these communities, and economic constraints that limit the extension of the network. Because of the optimal integration of environmental, social, and economical factors the model allows a sustainable monitoring and planning of biodiversity for the future.

[1]  D. Doak,et al.  The Statistical Inevitability of Stability‐Diversity Relationships in Community Ecology , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Tak Fung,et al.  Functional complexity: The source of value in biodiversity , 2012 .

[3]  S. Havlin,et al.  Scale-free networks are ultrasmall. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[4]  R. May,et al.  Systemic risk in banking ecosystems , 2011, Nature.

[5]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Anticipating Critical Transitions , 2012, Science.

[6]  Jef Caers Value of Information , 2011 .

[7]  Joshua B Plotkin,et al.  Seed Dispersal and Spatial Pattern in Tropical Trees , 2006, PLoS biology.

[8]  P. Holme,et al.  Agent-based model approach to optimal foraging in heterogeneous landscapes: effects of patch clumpiness , 2007 .

[9]  J. Caers,et al.  A Distance-based Prior Model Parameterization for Constraining Solutions of Spatial Inverse Problems , 2008 .

[10]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Ecological-economic optimization of biodiversity conservation under climate change , 2011 .

[11]  S. Gaines,et al.  Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Jon Norberg,et al.  Resilience Management in Social-ecological Systems: a Working Hypothesis for a Participatory Approach , 2002 .

[13]  Forrest R. Stevens,et al.  Roads as Drivers of Change: Trajectories across the Tri-National Frontier in MAP, the Southwestern Amazon , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[14]  Sitabhra Sinha,et al.  Complexity vs. stability in small-world networks , 2004, nlin/0407053.

[15]  Marc Bocquet,et al.  Design of a monitoring network over France in case of a radiological accidental release , 2008 .

[16]  Tim Sutton,et al.  How Global Is the Global Biodiversity Information Facility? , 2007, PloS one.

[17]  Mark L. Taper,et al.  Human‐mediated long‐distance dispersal: an empirical evaluation of seed dispersal by vehicles , 2012 .

[18]  M. Rietkerk,et al.  Robust scaling in ecosystems and the meltdown of patch size distributions before extinction. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[19]  M. Convertino,et al.  Inferring Species Richness and Turnover by Statistical Multiresolution Texture Analysis of Satellite Imagery , 2012, PloS one.

[20]  John M. Anderies,et al.  Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems , 2006 .

[21]  Jeremy E. Oakley,et al.  Decision-Theoretic Sensitivity Analysis for Complex Computer Models , 2009, Technometrics.

[22]  Ignacio Marín,et al.  Surprise maximization reveals the community structure of complex networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis to select metrics for design and monitoring of sustainable ecosystem restorations , 2013 .

[24]  S. Perz,et al.  Regional integration and local change: road paving, community connectivity, and social–ecological resilience in a tri-national frontier, southwestern Amazonia , 2012, Regional Environmental Change.

[25]  R. Betts,et al.  Climate Change, Deforestation, and the Fate of the Amazon , 2008, Science.

[26]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Ecological Resilience, Biodiversity, and Scale , 1998, Ecosystems.

[27]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[28]  Robert M. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[29]  J E Ramirez-Marquez,et al.  Implementation of multi-objective optimization for vulnerability analysis of complex networks , 2010 .

[30]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Distorted Views of Biodiversity: Spatial and Temporal Bias in Species Occurrence Data , 2010, PLoS biology.

[31]  Daniel R. Brumbaugh,et al.  An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean , 2012, Nature.

[32]  Patrick Reinmoeller,et al.  The Link Between Diversity and Resilience , 2005 .

[33]  I. Linkov,et al.  Integrating Risk and Resilience Approaches to Catastrophe Management in Engineering Systems , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  Brendan A Wintle,et al.  Allocating monitoring effort in the face of unknown unknowns. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[35]  Avner Friedman,et al.  Host Demographic Allee Effect, Fatal Disease, and Migration: Persistence or Extinction , 2012, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[36]  H. Howe,et al.  Forest fragmentation severs mutualism between seed dispersers and an endemic African tree , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  David A Siegel,et al.  Marine protected areas and the value of spatially optimized fishery management , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Kenneth J Feeley,et al.  Extinction risks of Amazonian plant species , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being , 2010 .

[40]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Epistemic uncertainty in predicting shorebird biogeography affected by sea-level rise , 2012 .

[41]  Christopher Costello,et al.  The value of spatial information in MPA network design , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Tapan Mukerji,et al.  A methodology for quantifying the value of spatial information for dynamic Earth problems , 2013, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[43]  O. Phillips,et al.  Continental-scale patterns of canopy tree composition and function across Amazonia , 2006, Nature.

[44]  Jeffrey M. Keisler,et al.  Value of Information in Portfolio Decision Analysis , 2004, Decis. Anal..

[45]  Peter J Mumby,et al.  Reserve design for uncertain responses of coral reefs to climate change. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[46]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[47]  Robert M. May,et al.  Size and complexity in model financial systems , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  Identifying Sets of Key Nodes for Placing Sensors in Dynamic Water Distribution Networks , 2008 .

[49]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[50]  R. DeFries,et al.  The Amazon basin in transition , 2012, Nature.

[51]  I. Y. Kim,et al.  Adaptive weighted-sum method for bi-objective optimization: Pareto front generation , 2005 .

[52]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Locating the Source of Diffusion in Large-Scale Networks , 2012, Physical review letters.

[53]  Leonardo Alfonso,et al.  Coupling hydrodynamic models and value of information for designing stage monitoring networks , 2012 .

[54]  Matthias Dehmer,et al.  Exploring Statistical and Population Aspects of Network Complexity , 2012, PloS one.

[55]  Enrico Bertuzzo,et al.  River networks as ecological corridors: A complex systems perspective for integrating hydrologic, geomorphologic, and ecologic dynamics , 2009 .

[56]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Network structures from selection principles. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[57]  Jinfeng Wang,et al.  A review of spatial sampling , 2012 .

[58]  David G. Rand,et al.  Individual versus systemic risk and the Regulator's Dilemma , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Tapan Mukerji,et al.  The Value of Information in Spatial Decision Making , 2010 .

[60]  Stephen G. Perz,et al.  Connectivity and Resilience: A Multidimensional Analysis of Infrastructure Impacts in the Southwestern Amazon , 2012 .

[61]  L. Alessa,et al.  Social–ecological hotspots mapping : A spatial approach for identifying coupled social–ecological space , 2008 .

[62]  Yu-Pin Lin,et al.  Designing an optimal multivariate geostatistical groundwater quality monitoring network using factorial kriging and genetic algorithms , 2006 .

[63]  Gordon Hazen,et al.  The Value of Environmental Information without Control of Subsequent Decisions , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[64]  R. Nemani,et al.  Persistent effects of a severe drought on Amazonian forest canopy , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  K. Gurney,et al.  Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence , 2008, PloS one.

[66]  Christopher C Wilmers,et al.  Understanding ecosystem robustness. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[67]  Mark A. Burgman,et al.  Treatment of uncertainty in conservation under climate change , 2013 .

[68]  Ershun Zhong,et al.  An information-fusion method to identify pattern of spatial heterogeneity for improving the accuracy of estimation , 2008 .

[69]  Tatiana Borisova,et al.  Value of information for water quality management , 2005 .

[70]  Alessandro Flammini,et al.  Scaling, Optimality, and Landscape Evolution , 2001 .

[71]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Driving a wedge into the Amazon , 2007, Nature.

[72]  A. Wilhite,et al.  Bilateral Trade and ‘Small-World’ Networks , 2001 .

[73]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Signatures of vegetational functional diversity in river basins , 2008 .

[74]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  The Value of Biodiversity , 2013 .

[75]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[76]  S. Levin,et al.  Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[77]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[78]  John C. Crittenden,et al.  Index of network resilience for urban water distribution systems , 2016, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructures.

[79]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank , 2010 .