Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects

A set of three experiments was performed to investigate the role of visual imaging in the haptic recognition of raised-line depictions of common objects. Blindfolded, sighted (Experiment 1) observers performed the task very poorly, while several findings converged to indicate that a visual translation process was adopted. These included: (1) strong correlations between imageability ratings (obtained in Experiment 1 and, independently, in Experiment 2) and both recognition speed and accuracy, (2) superior performance with, and greater ease of imaging, twodimensional as opposed to three-dimensional depictions, despite equivalence in rated line complexity, and (3) a significant correlation between the general ability ofthe observer to image and obtained imageability ratings of the stimulus depictions. That congenitally blind observers performed the same task even more poorly, while their performance did not differ for two- versus three-dimensional depictions (Experiment 3), provides further evidence that visual translation was used by the sighted. Such limited performance is contrasted with the considerable skill with which real common objects are processed and recognized haptically. The reasons for the general difference in the haptic performance of two- versus three-dimensional tasks are considered. Implications for the presentation of spatial information in the form of tangible graphics displays for the blind are also discussed.

[1]  W Schiff,et al.  Informative Tactile Stimuli in the Perception of Direction , 1966, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[3]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Perception of interpolated position and orientation by vision and active touch , 1969 .

[4]  D. F. Marks,et al.  Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. , 1973, British journal of psychology.

[5]  D. Bartram,et al.  The effects of familiarity and practice on naming pictures of objects , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  T S Wong,et al.  Dynamic properties of radial and tangential movements as determinants of the haptic horizontal--vertical illusion with an L figure. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980 .

[9]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Exploring pictures tactually , 1980, Nature.

[10]  H. Wake,et al.  Perception of tactile three dimensional information and visual aids for blind persons , 1980 .

[11]  J. Loomis.  On the tangibility of letters and braille , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  B. Jones.  The Developmental Significance of Cross-Modal Matching , 1981 .

[13]  S J Lederman,et al.  Tangible Graphs for the Blind , 1982, Human factors.

[14]  W. Schiff,et al.  Tactual Perception: A Source Book , 1983 .

[15]  N H Kerr,et al.  The role of vision in "visual imagery" experiments: evidence from the congenitally blind. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  J L Barth.  Incised Grids: Enhancing the Readability of Tangible Graphs for the Blind , 1984, Human factors.

[17]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Spatial and movement-based heuristics for encoding pattern information through touch. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system” , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Exploring Environments by Hand or Foot: Time-Based Heuristics for Encoding Distance in Movement Space , 1987 .

[20]  R. Klatzky,et al.  There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. , 1987 .

[21]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  R. Klatzky,et al.  The Intelligent Hand , 1988 .

[23]  D. McLinden,et al.  Spatial Task Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 1988 .

[24]  S. Lederman,et al.  An Evaluation of the Legibility and Meaningfulness of Potential Map Symbols , 1989 .

[25]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Haptic integration of object properties: texture, hardness, and planar contour. , 1989 .

[26]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic classification of common objects: Knowledge-driven exploration , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Similarity of Tactual and Visual Picture Recognition with Limited Field of View , 1991, Perception.