Team Composition and Team Performance: Achieving Higher Quality Results in an International Higher Education Environment

This study was piloted over a period of three years (2008-2011) while teaching Project Management courses to international students at Mikkeli University of Applied Sciences, Finland - aiming to explore the possibility to apply the Belbin’s theory on building successful managerial teams in a multicultural higher education environment – in order to achieve better quality results. The objective of the study was multifold: (i) to explore the possibility to apply the theory in an international higher education environment; (ii) to assess the students’ satisfaction of working in teams built according to different criteria; (iii) to assess the quality of the students’ performance while working in teams; (iv) to check if there is any relationship between the quality of the performance and the way of building the team. The results are positive overall: the theory is applicable in the above conditions; students’ satisfaction depends on the way the team is built; building the teams according to the theory of team members’ roles leads to better quality performance. The results of the study are equally important for higher education professors and managers, aiming at improving the quality of the higher education process. The international dimension is a measure of innovative, entrepreneurial university.

[1]  D. Chatterjee.  Innovativeness: a team knowledge and communication perspective , 2012 .

[2]  Kiyoshi Niwa,et al.  Trial implementation of a highly autonomous small-team-type R&D management model in a Japanese electronics company , 2011, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[3]  R. Meredith Belbin,et al.  Team Roles at Work , 2022 .

[4]  M. Higgs,et al.  Influence of team composition and task complexity on team performance , 2005 .

[5]  Heng-Li Yang,et al.  Influence of team organisation and forum support for software development team members' interactions , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Chang. Manag..

[6]  J. Kidd.  Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail , 1982 .

[7]  Cynthia L. Tomovic,et al.  The impact of Product Lifecycle Management on virtual team creation: a concept change model for heightened productivity , 2010, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[8]  Kees Ahaus,et al.  Team roles, team balance and performance , 2008 .

[9]  M. Shattock.  Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy: diversification and organizational change in european higher education , 2008 .

[10]  Tojo Thatchenkery,et al.  Understanding culture-specific leadership relationship in a multi-cultural virtual project team (MVPT): a case study , 2011 .

[11]  Wann‐Yih Wu,et al.  Interrelationships between TMT management style, operation mode and management performance , 2005 .

[12]  D. Partington,et al.  Team role balance and team performance: an empirical study , 1999 .

[13]  J. Prichard,et al.  Testing Belbin's Team Role Theory of Effective Groups. , 1999 .

[14]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Towards a model for team learning in multidisciplinary crisis management teams , 2008 .

[15]  B. Clark.  Creating entrepreneurial universities : organizational pathways of transformation , 1998 .

[16]  Philip Crosby,et al.  Characteristics and techniques of successful high-technology project managers , 2012 .

[17]  Paul Temple,et al.  Teaching and Learning: an Entrepreneurial Perspective , 2009 .

[18]  Stephen Swailes,et al.  TEAM ROLE PREFERENCE AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STYLES , 2005 .

[19]  Barbara Senior.  Team roles and team performance: Is there ‘really’ a link? , 1997 .

[20]  Barbara Senior,et al.  *Belbin's Team Role Model: Development, Validity and Applications for Team Building , 2007 .

[21]  H. Stevenson,et al.  A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management * , 1990 .

[22]  M. M. Qurashi.  Dependence of publication-rate on size of some university groups and departments in U. K. and Greece in comparison with N. C. I., USA , 2005, Scientometrics.

[23]  R. Breitenecker,et al.  The influence of team heterogeneity on team processes of multi-person ventures: an empirical analysis of highly innovative academic start-ups , 2011 .

[24]  Team empowerment: an empirical study in Spanish University R&D teams , 2005 .

[25]  R. Meredith Belbin.  Changing the way we work , 1997 .

[26]  Terri R. Kurtzberg.  Creative styles and teamwork: Effects of coordination and conflict on group outcomes. , 2000 .

[27]  G. Stewart.  A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance , 2006 .

[28]  Jon R. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization , 1992 .

[29]  J. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams , 2010 .

[30]  S. K. Horwitz.  The Compositional Impact of Team Diversity on Performance: Theoretical Considerations , 2005 .

[31]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[32]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[33]  Richard Templar.  The Rules of Management , 2004 .

[34]  T. J. Kamalanabhan,et al.  Diversity in software development teams: the moderating effects of interdependence, team tenure and project type , 2011 .

[35]  B. R. Aston,et al.  Building Effective Management Teams , 1976 .

[36]  Wei-Li Wu,et al.  Team personality composition, affective ties and knowledge sharing: a team-level analysis , 2011, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[37]  Belbin’s team role theory: for non‐managers also? , 2002 .