Drought phenotyping in Vitis vinifera using RGB and NIR imaging

Abstract This study examined whether morphophysiological traits (i.e., leaf area, plant water consumption, leaf water potential) of drought stressed grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) might be determined through the use of non-destructive RGB and NIR image-based analysis techniques for possible implementation of affordable phenotyping. The study was carried out at a centre which is part of the European Plant Phenotyping Network (EPPN) also aiming at contribute to the standardisation of phenotyping protocols. Four groups of 20 potted vines each were subjected to various irrigation treatments restoring 100% (control), 75% (IRR75%), 50% (IRR50%) and 25% (IRR25%) of their daily water consumption within a 22-day period of drought imposition. Leaf gas exchanges, leaf water potential (Ψ), photosystem II efficiency (Fv/Fm), RGB and NIR data were simultaneously collected during drought imposition. Values of Ψ in IRR25% vines reached −1.2 MPa pre-dawn, in turn stomatal conductance and net photosynthetic rate reached values as low as approx. 0.02 mol H2O m−2 s–1 and 1.0 μmol CO2 m−2 s–1, respectively. Through a cross-validation analysis, this study modelled (R2 = 0.78) the estimation of plant canopy area based on the number of pixel of RGB images of vines under various drought levels. Estimated leaf area was employed to calculate water consumption per unit leaf area, which resulted correlated (R2 = 0.86) with Ψ. Results revealed a correlation between Ψ and Dark Green colour class (R2 = 0.71) and suggest a new working hypothesis concerning the phenotyping of leaf (or petiole) angle. NIR and Dark Green colour fraction decreased with increasing levels of drought while the Yellow one increased. The outcomes presented may strengthen the role of RGB and NIR based images to identify the occurrence of water-stress in Vitis spp. and contribute to both the standardisation of phenotyping protocols pursued by the global phenotyping community and the possible development of new tools for precision irrigation in a HTP domain.

[1]  S. Christensen,et al.  Plant phenomics and the need for physiological phenotyping across scales to narrow the genotype-to-phenotype knowledge gap. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[2]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  Modelling Potential Crop Growth Processes , 1994, Current Issues in Production Ecology.

[3]  Erik Lichtenberg,et al.  Grower demand for sensor‐controlled irrigation , 2015 .

[4]  M. Tester,et al.  Image-based phenotyping for non-destructive screening of different salinity tolerance traits in rice , 2014, Rice.

[5]  Neil C. Turner,et al.  Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status , 1981, Plant and Soil.

[6]  Ulrich Schurr,et al.  Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. , 2013, Annual review of plant biology.

[7]  Sergi Munné-Bosch,et al.  Die and let live: leaf senescence contributes to plant survival under drought stress. , 2004, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[8]  A. Marcomini,et al.  A risk assessment framework for irrigated agriculture under climate change , 2017 .

[9]  Enrico Peterlunger,et al.  Effect of Soil Moisture Availability on Merlot: From Leaf Water Potential to Grape Composition , 2005, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[10]  Pablo J. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Vineyard irrigation scheduling based on airborne thermal imagery and water potential thresholds , 2016 .

[11]  Juan Fernández-Novales,et al.  Vineyard water status assessment using on-the-go thermal imaging and machine learning , 2018, PloS one.

[12]  J. Flexas,et al.  Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): An open gate to improve water-use efficiency? , 2005 .

[13]  J. Fernández,et al.  Plant-Based Methods for Irrigation Scheduling of Woody Crops , 2017 .

[14]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[15]  D. F. Cox,et al.  Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. , 1984 .

[16]  J. Flexas,et al.  Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress? , 2004, The New phytologist.

[17]  J. Flexas,et al.  Average daily light interception determines leaf water use efficiency among different canopy locations in grapevine , 2012 .

[18]  Takayuki Tohge,et al.  Integrative field scale phenotyping for investigating metabolic components of water stress within a vineyard , 2017, Plant Methods.

[19]  Josep Cifre,et al.  A ten-year study on the physiology of two Spanish grapevine cultivars under field conditions: effects of water availability from leaf photosynthesis to grape yield and quality. , 2003, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[20]  G. Bingham,et al.  Rapid estimates of relative water content. , 1974, Plant physiology.

[21]  K Maxwell,et al.  Chlorophyll fluorescence--a practical guide. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[22]  Willem Kruijer,et al.  High throughput screening with chlorophyll fluorescence imaging and its use in crop improvement. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[23]  O. Silvestroni,et al.  Evaluation of low-energy demand adaptive mechanisms in Sangiovese grapevine during drought , 2008 .

[24]  S. Miller,et al.  Effects of Water Stress on Fruit Quality Attributes of Kiwifruit , 1998 .

[25]  H. Jones,et al.  Exploring thermal imaging variables for the detection of stress responses in grapevine under different irrigation regimes. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[26]  M. Diago,et al.  In field quantification and discrimination of different vineyard water regimes by on-the-go NIR spectroscopy , 2018 .

[27]  Eric Lebon,et al.  Towards a simple indicator of water stress in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) based on the differential sensitivities of vegetative growth components , 2005 .

[28]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[29]  Carlos Lopes,et al.  Modern viticulture in southern Europe: Vulnerabilities and strategies for adaptation to water scarcity , 2016 .

[30]  H. Nguyen,et al.  Sorghum stay-green QTL individually reduce post-flowering drought-induced leaf senescence. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[31]  S. Poni,et al.  Response of “Sangiovese” grapevines to partial root-zone drying: Gas-exchange, growth and grape composition , 2007 .

[32]  B. Mueller‐Roeber,et al.  A growth phenotyping pipeline for Arabidopsis thaliana integrating image analysis and rosette area modeling for robust quantification of genotype effects. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[33]  J. Santiago,et al.  Macro- and microscopic leaf characteristics of six grapevine genotypes ( Vitis spp.) with different susceptibilities to grapevine downy mildew , 2010 .

[34]  Argelia Lorence,et al.  Moderate to severe water limitation differentially affects the phenome and ionome of Arabidopsis. , 2016, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[35]  M. Diago,et al.  Future opportunities of proximal near infrared spectroscopy approaches to determine the variability of vineyard water status , 2017 .

[36]  C. Ruiz,et al.  Effect of Water Stress on Leaf Area Development, Photosynthesis, and Productivity in Chardonnay and Airén Grapevines , 2002, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[37]  María-Paz Diago,et al.  Grapevine Yield and Leaf Area Estimation Using Supervised Classification Methodology on RGB Images Taken under Field Conditions , 2012, Sensors.

[38]  Alberto Palliotti,et al.  Physiological parameters and protective energy dissipation mechanisms expressed in the leaves of two Vitis vinifera L. genotypes under multiple summer stresses. , 2015, Journal of plant physiology.

[39]  C. Xiloyannis,et al.  Shade mitigates photoinhibition and enhances water use efficiency in kiwifruit under drought , 2009, Photosynthetica.

[40]  Kenneth A. Shackel,et al.  Water relations of woody perennial plant species , 2007 .

[41]  F. Baret,et al.  What is cost-efficient phenotyping? Optimizing costs for different scenarios. , 2019, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[42]  D. M. Klaus,et al.  The assessment of leaf water content using leaf reflectance ratios in the visible, near‐, and short‐wave‐infrared , 2008 .

[43]  M. Tester,et al.  High-throughput shoot imaging to study drought responses. , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[44]  María Romero,et al.  Vineyard water status estimation using multispectral imagery from an UAV platform and machine learning algorithms for irrigation scheduling management , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[45]  E. Magnanini,et al.  The isohydric cv. Montepulciano (Vitis vinifera L.) does not improve its whole-plant water use efficiency when subjected to pre-veraison water stress , 2014 .

[46]  Matthew Bardeen,et al.  Artificial Neural Network to Predict Vine Water Status Spatial Variability Using Multispectral Information Obtained from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) , 2017, Sensors.

[47]  D. Cozzolino,et al.  Non-destructive measurement of grapevine water potential using near infrared spectroscopy , 2011 .

[48]  L. Xiong,et al.  Novel Digital Features Discriminate Between Drought Resistant and Drought Sensitive Rice Under Controlled and Field Conditions , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[49]  M. M. Chaves,et al.  Grapevine under deficit irrigation: hints from physiological and molecular data. , 2010, Annals of botany.

[50]  A. Karnieli,et al.  Combining leaf physiology, hyperspectral imaging and partial least squares-regression (PLS-R) for grapevine water status assessment , 2015 .

[51]  Samuel Ortega-Farías,et al.  Effects of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) water status on water consumption, vegetative growth and grape quality: An irrigation scheduling application to achieve regulated deficit irrigation , 2010 .

[52]  J. Girona,et al.  The use of midday leaf water potential for scheduling deficit irrigation in vineyards , 2005, Irrigation Science.

[53]  H. Jones,et al.  Thermal infrared imaging of crop canopies for the remote diagnosis and quantification of plant responses to water stress in the field. , 2009, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[54]  J. Roger,et al.  Test of sampling methods to optimize the calibration of vine water status spatial models , 2018, Precision Agriculture.

[55]  N. Nikolaou,et al.  Rootstock effects on the adaptive strategies of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet–Sauvignon) under contrasting water status: Leaf physiological and structural responses , 2008 .

[56]  P. Perata,et al.  Physiological responses to Megafol® treatments in tomato plants under drought stress: A phenomic and molecular approach , 2014 .

[57]  Yufeng Ge,et al.  Temporal dynamics of maize plant growth, water use, and leaf water content using automated high throughput RGB and hyperspectral imaging , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[58]  M. Meron,et al.  Crop water status estimation using thermography: multi-year model development using ground-based thermal images , 2014, Precision Agriculture.

[59]  Francois Tardieu,et al.  Modelling strategies for assessing and increasing the effectiveness of new phenotyping techniques in plant breeding. , 2019, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[60]  M. Diago,et al.  Development and Validation of a New Methodology to Assess the Vineyard Water Status by On-the-Go Near Infrared Spectroscopy , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[61]  J. L. Araus,et al.  Using vegetation indices derived from conventional digital cameras as selection criteria for wheat breeding in water-limited environments , 2007 .

[62]  Juan Fernández-Novales,et al.  Non-destructive assessment of grapevine water status in the field using a portable NIR spectrophotometer. , 2017, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[63]  Michele Rinaldi,et al.  Chapter Six – Decision Support Systems to Manage Irrigation in Agriculture * , 2014 .

[64]  H. Poorter,et al.  Phenotyping plants: genes, phenes and machines. , 2012, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[65]  Alberto Palliotti,et al.  Plant and leaf physiological responses to water stress in potted 'Vignoles' grapevine , 2015 .