A Novel Approach towards Sustainability Assessment in Manufacturing and Stakeholder’s Role

With increasing consumer awareness about sustainability and governmental policies to address environmental challenges and social responsibility, the manufacturing sector is under continuous pressure to adopt more sustainable practices. Trends show that factories of the future (FOF) will need to adapt to market demands, growing economic and ecological efficiency requirements, and corporate social responsibility; such versatility is vital to address consumer disquiet and sustainability expectations. Various approaches have been proposed to assess sustainability over the last few decades. Most of these approaches have limitations in that they are of marginal relevance to the manufacturing environment, tend to focus on only one aspect of sustainability, or are too complicated for most organisations to implement. Moreover, numerous studies have demonstrated a gap in sustainability expectations among various stakeholders, and no active mechanisms exist to prioritise sustainability in manufacturing. This paper introduced a novel approach to address both the manufacturer and multiple stakeholders’ expectations about sustainability prioritisations in manufacturing practices. It achieved this using a modified quality function deployment (QFD) tool along with AHP and normalisation techniques. A set of system boundaries was adopted to evaluate sustainability in the manufacturing context; this research was a ‘Gate to Gate’ border. These indicators and a score-based approach will help organisations better grasp how manufacturing operations interact with sustainability and decision-making. They will help lead to improvements in the allocation of corporate resources used to manage and improve sustainability performance in manufacturing.

[1]  A. P. Valerga Puerta,et al.  Sustainable Production , 2022, Interceram - International Ceramic Review.

[2]  Diego Martinez Prata,et al.  A systematic methodology for comparing the sustainability of process systems based on weighted performance indicators , 2019, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[3]  J. Magrans,et al.  Guidance of EFSA on risk assessments for active substances of plant protection products that have stereoisomers as components or impurities and for transformation products of active substances that may have stereoisomers , 2019, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[4]  Dean S. Hartley III,et al.  Engagement , 2018, Cognitive Superiority.

[5]  Carrie L. Yodanis The Industry , 2018, Getting Dressed.

[6]  Donald Huisingh,et al.  A review of ‘theories of the firm’ and their contributions to Corporate Sustainability , 2015 .

[7]  Karl R. Haapala,et al.  Integrating Sustainable Manufacturing Assessment into Decision Making for a Production Work Cell , 2015 .

[8]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Definition of sustainability impact categories based on stakeholder perspectives , 2015 .

[9]  Awanis Romli,et al.  Integrated eco-design decision making for sustainable product design , 2015 .

[10]  S. Dun A training manual , 2015 .

[11]  Laura Hay,et al.  Generic models of technical systems sustainability , 2015 .

[12]  Mehdi Amini,et al.  Corporate sustainability: an integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research , 2014 .

[13]  Giacomo Manetti,et al.  The Role of Stakeholders in Sustainability Reporting Assurance , 2012 .

[14]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development , 2011 .

[16]  Jane M. Young,et al.  How to critically appraise an article , 2009, Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[17]  Walter Kloepffer,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of products , 2008 .

[18]  Stefan Olander,et al.  Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management , 2007 .

[19]  Bob Frame,et al.  The Sustainability Assessment Model (SAM): Measuring Sustainable Development Performance , 2006 .

[20]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Conceptualising sustainability assessment , 2004 .

[21]  Helmut Rechberger,et al.  Practical handbook of material flow analysis , 2003 .

[22]  P. Glavič,et al.  Indicators of sustainable production , 2003 .

[23]  Luc Hens,et al.  Introduction to Sustainability Assessment at the Local Level , 2001 .

[24]  F. C. James,et al.  Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics , 1994 .

[25]  Van-Nam Huynh,et al.  Advances in Information and Communication Technology: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference ICTA 2023, Volume 1 , 2023, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems.

[26]  Enrique Mu,et al.  Practical Decision Making , 2017 .

[27]  Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke,et al.  Sustainable Value Management for Construction Projects , 2017 .

[28]  Schau Erwin,et al.  Normalisation method and data for Environmental Footprints , 2014 .

[29]  Safian Sharif,et al.  Fuzzy Application in Sustainability Assessment: A Case Study of Automotive Headlamp , 2012 .

[30]  I. S. Jawahir,et al.  Sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels , 2010 .

[31]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Corporate Sustainability Reporting. An Overview , 2006 .

[32]  R. Goodland The Concept of Environmental Sustainability , 1995 .

[33]  P. Boulanger the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Surveys , 2022 .

[34]  Dicksen Tanzil,et al.  Sustainability Metrics , 2022 .