One-Shot Decision Theory

This paper focuses on one-shot (one-time) decision problems, which concern the situations where a decision is experienced only once. Such one-shot decision problems are commonly encountered in business, economics, and social systems. The one-shot decision process comprises two steps. In the first step, a decision maker identifies which state of nature should be taken into account for each alternative among all available states of nature. These identified states of nature are called focus points. Twelve types of focus points are proposed according to a decision maker's attitudes about the possibility of a state of nature and satisfaction resulted by its occurrence. In the second step, a decision maker evaluates the alternatives based on focus points where the consequences provided by all alternatives are compared with each other to obtain the best alternative. The relationships between different focus points are analyzed. An example, which is a newsvendor problem of a new product with a short life cycle, is used to illustrate the one-shot decision. The results of analysis show that the proposed decision models can provide useful insights into understanding different behaviors of decision makers and help the decision maker in finding out the best solution according to his/her attitude about possibility and satisfaction.

[1]  David Schmeidleis SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY AND EXPECTED UTILITY WITHOUT ADDITIVITY , 1989 .

[2]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  A Fractiles Perspective to the Joint Price/Quantity Newsvendor Model , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos,et al.  New tools for decision analysts , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[4]  Tetsuya Murai,et al.  Multiple-attribute decision making under uncertainty: the evidential reasoning approach revisited , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[5]  Kaoru Hirota,et al.  Fuzzy Algorithm for Group Decision Making With Participants Having Finite Discriminating Abilities , 2009, SMC 2009.

[6]  Mohammad Bagher Menhaj,et al.  A Systematic Fuzzy Decision-Making Process to Choose the Best Model Among a Set of Competing Models , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[7]  Thomas Whalen,et al.  Decisionmaking under uncertainty with various assumptions about available information , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[8]  Hideo Tanaka,et al.  Possibilistic Data Analysis for Operations Research , 1999 .

[9]  Peijun Guo Private Real Estate Investment Analysis within a One-Shot Decision Framework , 2010 .

[10]  R. Sugden,et al.  Regret Theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Review of Economic Studies , 1982 .

[11]  Z. Memish,et al.  Bioterrorism--a new challenge for public health. , 2003, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[12]  Peijun Guo,et al.  Group decision with inconsistent knowledge , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[13]  Jon Doyle,et al.  Background to Qualitative Decision Theory , 1999, AI Mag..

[14]  Charles H. Fine Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control In The Age Of Temporary Advantage , 1998 .

[15]  Haiyan Xu,et al.  Matrix Representation of Solution Concepts in Multiple-Decision-Maker Graph Models , 2009, SMC 2009.

[16]  Maqbool Dada,et al.  Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem: A Review with Extensions , 1999, Oper. Res..

[17]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[18]  F.C.A. Groen,et al.  Possibilistic decision making in sensor systhems , 1998 .

[19]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Linguistic models as a framework of user-centric system modeling , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[20]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[21]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Modeling Ambiguity in Decisions Under Uncertainty , 1988 .

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[23]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information , 1988 .

[24]  Lluis Godo,et al.  On the Possibilistic-Based Decision Model: Characterization of Preference Relations Under Partial Inconsistency , 2001, Applied Intelligence.

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[26]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Weighted Maximum Entropy OWA Aggregation With Applications to Decision Making Under Risk , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[27]  Krishna R. Pattipati,et al.  A Markov Decision Problem Approach to Goal Attainment , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[28]  Peijun Guo One-shot decision approach and its application to duopoly market , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci..

[29]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Decision-theoretic foundations of qualitative possibility theory , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Phan Hong Giang,et al.  Two axiomatic approaches to decision making using possibility theory , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..