A boundary-representation method for designing whole-body radiation dosimetry models: pregnant females at the ends of three gestational periods—RPI-P3, -P6 and -P9

Fetuses are extremely radiosensitive and the protection of pregnant females against ionizing radiation is of particular interest in many health and medical physics applications. Existing models of pregnant females relied on simplified anatomical shapes or partial-body images of low resolutions. This paper reviews two general types of solid geometry modeling: constructive solid geometry (CSG) and boundary representation (BREP). It presents in detail a project to adopt the BREP modeling approach to systematically design whole-body radiation dosimetry models: a pregnant female and her fetus at the ends of three gestational periods of 3, 6 and 9 months. Based on previously published CT images of a 7-month pregnant female, the VIP-Man model and mesh organ models, this new set of pregnant female models was constructed using 3D surface modeling technologies instead of voxels. The organ masses were adjusted to agree with the reference data provided by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and previously published papers within 0.5%. The models were then voxelized for the purpose of performing dose calculations in identically implemented EGS4 and MCNPX Monte Carlo codes. The agreements of the fetal doses obtained from these two codes for this set of models were found to be within 2% for the majority of the external photon irradiation geometries of AP, PA, LAT, ROT and ISO at various energies. It is concluded that the so-called RPI-P3, RPI-P6 and RPI-P9 models have been reliably defined for Monte Carlo calculations. The paper also discusses the needs for future research and the possibility for the BREP method to become a major tool in the anatomical modeling for radiation dosimetry.

[1]  Jing Chen,et al.  MATHEMATICAL MODELS OF THE EMBRYO AND FETUS FOR USE IN RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION , 2004, Health physics.

[2]  Ian Stroud,et al.  Boundary representation modelling techniques , 2006 .

[3]  C. Streffer.  Can tissue weighting factors be established for the embryo and fetus? , 2004, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[4]  Coexistence of pregnancy and malignancy. , 2002 .

[5]  C R Blackwell,et al.  Fetal dose from radiotherapy with photon beams: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 36. , 1995, Medical physics.

[6]  W. Kainz,et al.  Calculation of induced current densities and specific absorption rates (SAR) for pregnant women exposed to hand-held metal detectors. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Deanna Hasenauer,et al.  Hybrid computational phantoms of the male and female newborn patient: NURBS-based whole-body models , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  James A. Scott.  Photon, Electron, Proton and Neutron Interaction Data for Body Tissues ICRU Report 46. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, 1992, $40.00 , 1993 .

[9]  X. Xu,et al.  Specific absorbed fractions from the image-based VIP-Man body model and EGS4-VLSI Monte Carlo code: internal electron emitters. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  M. P. Billings,et al.  The Computerized Anatomical Man (CAM) model , 1973 .

[11]  X. Xu,et al.  SPECIFIC ABSORBED FRACTIONS FOR INTERNAL PHOTON EMITTERS CALCULATED FOR A TOMOGRAPHIC MODEL OF A PREGNANT WOMAN , 2004, Health physics.

[12]  Greg Turk,et al.  Simplification and Repair of Polygonal Models Using Volumetric Techniques , 2003, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[13]  D. Manocha,et al.  Development and application of the new dynamic Nurbs-based Cardiac-Torso (NCAT) phantom. , 2001 .

[14]  N. Pavlidis.  Coexistence of pregnancy and malignancy. , 2002, The oncologist.

[15]  N Leitgeb,et al.  Fetal exposure to low frequency electric and magnetic fields , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Jack Valentin,et al.  Pregnancy and medical radiation. , 2000, Annals of the ICRP.

[17]  Koichi Ogawa,et al.  Simple Modeling of an Abdomen of Pregnant Women and Its Application to SAR Estimation , 2006, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[18]  X. Xu,et al.  Fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients from monoenergetic neutrons below 20 MeV based on the VIP-Man anatomical model , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  A. Bozkurt,et al.  VIP-MAN: AN IMAGE-BASED WHOLE-BODY ADULT MALE MODEL CONSTRUCTED FROM COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE VISIBLE HUMAN PROJECT FOR MULTI-PARTICLE MONTE CARLO CALCULATIONS , 2000, Health physics.

[20]  Michael Leyton,et al.  A generative theory of shape , 2004, Proceedings Shape Modeling Applications, 2004..

[21]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  Development of pregnant female, hybrid voxel-mathematical models and their application to the dosimetry of applied magnetic and electric fields at 50 Hz , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Jack Valentin,et al.  Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus) , 2003 .

[23]  X. Xu,et al.  Fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients based on the VIP-Man anatomical model and MCNPX code for monoenergetic neutrons above 20 MeV. , 2001, Health physics.

[24]  C. Heath,et al.  The Children of Atomic Bomb Survivors: A Genetic Study , 1992 .

[25]  A. R. Green,et al.  Cosmic radiation exposure on Canadian-based commercial airline routes. , 1999, Radiation Protection Dosimetry.

[26]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  SAR in the mother and foetus for RF plane wave irradiation , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  D. Rogers,et al.  EGS4 code system , 1985 .

[28]  W. S. Snyder,et al.  Estimates of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom. , 1974, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  Ws Snyder,et al.  MIRD Pamphlet #11: S, Absorbed Dose per Unit Cumulated Activity for Selected Radionuclides and Organs , 1975 .

[30]  J. Valentin.  Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values , 2002, Annals of the ICRP.

[31]  H. Kal,et al.  Radiotherapy during pregnancy: fact and fiction. , 2005, The Lancet. Oncology.

[32]  B M Tsui,et al.  Evaluation of cardiac cone-beam single photon emission computed tomography using observer performance experiments and receiver operating characteristic analysis. , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[33]  J. Valentin.  Doses to the embryo and fetus from intakes of radionuclides by the mother , 2001, Annals of the ICRP.

[34]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Equivalent dose to the fetus from occupational exposure of pregnant staff in diagnostic radiology. , 2001, British Journal of Radiology.

[35]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Computational anthropomorphic models of the human anatomy: the path to realistic Monte Carlo modeling in radiological sciences. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[36]  William J. Schull,et al.  The Children of atomic bomb survivors : a genetic study , 1992 .

[37]  W. S. Snyder,et al.  Report of the task group on reference man , 1979, Annals of the ICRP.

[38]  岩崎 民子.  SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[39]  Chengyu Shi,et al.  Development of a 30-week-pregnant female tomographic model from computed tomography (CT) images for Monte Carlo organ dose calculations. , 2004, Medical physics.

[40]  Keith F. Eckerman,et al.  Mathematical models and specific absorbed fractions of photon energy in the nonpregnant adult female and at the end of each trimester of pregnancy , 1995 .