OBJECTIVE
We categorized the MR imaging characteristics of intracranial epidermoid tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
MR images from 23 cases of intracranial epidermoid tumors were reviewed retrospectively. Signal intensities of tumor relative to surrounding structures were noted, as were the internal architecture of the tumors and the presence and degree of hydrocephalus.
RESULTS
Seventeen (74%) of 23 cases of intracranial epidermoid tumors were revealed as slightly hyperintense relative to CSF on T1-weighted MR images. Nineteen (95%) of 20 cases were hyperintense relative to CSF on proton density-weighted MR images. Fifteen (65%) of 23 cases were isointense to CSF on T2-weighted MR images, whereas the remaining eight cases (35%) were hyperintense to CSF on T2-weighted MR images. One (4%) of 23 cases showed signal intensity that was isointense to CSF on all pulse sequences. Fifteen (65%) of 23 cases showed heterogeneous signal characteristics on either T1-weighted or proton density-weighted MR images, or both. Eight (35%) of 23 cases showed a rim of hyperintensity on proton density-weighted MR images. Five (33%) of the 15 cases that received gadolinium showed rim enhancement. Five (22%) of 23 cases were multilocular, with different regions of tumors showing highly variable imaging characteristics. Two (9%) of 23 cases showed high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images in the adjacent brain parenchyma. Two (9%) of 23 cases showed mild hydrocephalus. Six (43%) of 14 tumors that either originated in or secondarily involved the cerebellopontine angle also extended into the ipsilateral Meckel's cave.
CONCLUSION
On T1-, proton density-, and T2-weighted MR images intracranial epidermoid tumors usually showed heterogeneous signal intensity that was hyperintense to CSF. On all spin-echo pulse sequences epidermoid tumors with signal characteristics isointense to CSF were unusual. Hydrocephalus, even in the setting of marked displacement and compression of the brainstem, was not usually seen on MR imaging. Meckel's cave was often involved secondarily with epidermoid tumors that involved the cerebellopontine angle.
[1]
C. P. Harris,et al.
Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Epidermoid tumor of the cerebellopontine angle.
,
1992,
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.
[2]
M E Moseley,et al.
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain: value of differentiating between extraaxial cysts and epidermoid tumors.
,
1990,
AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[3]
R. Bryan,et al.
MR of intracranial epidermoid tumors: correlation of in vivo imaging with in vitro 13C spectroscopy.
,
1990,
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.
[4]
H. Nukui,et al.
Epidermoid tumors of Meckel's cave: case report and review of the literature.
,
1989,
Neurosurgery.
[5]
R. Rodriguez y Baena,et al.
Epidermoid and dermoid tumors.
,
1989,
Rivista di neurologia.
[6]
R. Ethier,et al.
MR imaging of epidermoid cysts.
,
1989,
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.
[7]
P. Turski,et al.
Cerebellopontine angle-petromastoid mass lesions: comparative study of diagnosis with MR imaging and CT.
,
1987,
Radiology.
[8]
J. Kartush,et al.
Epidermoidomas of the cerebellopontine angle and temporal bone: CT and MR aspects.
,
1985,
Radiology.