Design synthesis methodology for dimensional management of assembly process with compliant non-ideal parts

This paper proposes a design synthesis methodology for dimensional management of assembly processes with compliant non-ideal parts which allows to integrate the critical and heterogeneous design tasks with conflicting or coupled objectives and design constraints such as: (1) tolerancing and variation simulation analysis (VSA); (2) fixture layout design optimization; (3) part-to-part joining process parameters selection and laser beam visibility analysis; or/and; (4) in-process measurement gauge visibility and accessibility analysis. The proposed methodology is based on the Adaptive Task Graph (ATG) that has capability to model design tasks by integrating Key Product Characteristics (KPCs) and Key Control Characteristics (KCCs) with their impact on the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs); this allows to dynamically capture interactions between design tasks as well as to generate tasks sequence. The design synthesismethodology is based on the development of: (i) assembly surrogate model linking KPCs to KCCs; (ii) sensitivity analysis with capability to model and analyse the interdependencies among design tasks and KPCs, KCCs and KPIs; and, (iii) ATG model which represents the hierarchy of design tasks and is used to generate the sequence of design tasks to minimize their interdependencies during design synthesis. The proposed methodology is illustrated and validated in the process of designing configurations for automotive door assembly with remote fiber laser welding joining process. The methodology shows potential to reduce engineering changes necessary during door assembly process build and testing by 25%

[1]  Christina Bloebaum,et al.  A genetic tool for optimal design sequencing in complex engineering systems , 1996 .

[2]  Jaime A. Camelio,et al.  Modeling Variation Propagation of Multi-Station Assembly Systems With Compliant Parts , 2003 .

[3]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  Pasquale Franciosa,et al.  Statistical variation analysis of multi-station compliant assemblies based on sensitivity matrix , 2008, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..

[5]  Dariusz Ceglarek,et al.  Impact of fixture design on sheet metal assembly variation , 2004 .

[6]  N. Suh Axiomatic Design of Mechanical Systems , 1995 .

[7]  David S. Cochran,et al.  Manufacturing System Design , 1998 .

[8]  Darek Ceglarek,et al.  Design Synthesis Framework for Dimensional Management in Multistage Assembly System , 2007 .

[9]  Pasquale Franciosa,et al.  Simulation of variational compliant assemblies with shape errors based on morphing mesh approach , 2011 .

[10]  D. Ceglarek,et al.  Time-Based Competition in Multistage Manufacturing: Stream-of-Variation Analysis (SOVA) Methodology—Review , 2004 .

[11]  Abdelhamid Chriette,et al.  A survey of multidisciplinary design optimization methods in launch vehicle design , 2012 .

[12]  Piet Demeester,et al.  A Surrogate Modeling and Adaptive Sampling Toolbox for Computer Based Design , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[13]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: With Applications , 1984 .

[14]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: An Emerging New Engineering Discipline , 1995 .

[15]  S. Jack Hu,et al.  Variation simulation for deformable sheet metal assemblies using finite element methods , 1997 .