Forebody vortex control - A progress review

Conventional fighter aircraft control surfaces, such as the rudder, become ineffective at high angles of attack resulting in a serious deficiency in lateraldirectional controllability in the angle of attack range for maximum lift and in the post stall regime. Development of robust control methods for high angle of attack flight has focused primarily on thrust vector control and forebody vortex control. This paper is an attempt to review the forebody vortex control research that has taken place in the last two to three years. Some earlier research results are also shown to provide a historical perspective and to document the state of our knowledge of this rapidly advancing technology. The techniques that have been investigated include large deployable or hinged strakes, pneumatic techniques using either nozzles or slots, suction through small holes or ports, and miniaturized rotatable nose-tip and nose-boom strakes. Optimized versions of all of these techniques are effective in producing primarily yawing moments at high AOA, with, for some configurations, some interactions in rolling moment. Mass flow rates required for pneumatic techniques are at levels that can be obtained from today's engine bleed systems. Application of techniques developed for conventional forebodies with rounded cross sections are just beginning to be evaluated for advanced forebodies with chined cross sections.

[1]  F. R. Dejarnette,et al.  New device for controlling asymmetric flowfields on forebodies at large alpha , 1991 .

[2]  Gerald N. Malcolm,et al.  Development of non-conventional control methods for high angle of attack flight using vortex manipulation , 1989 .

[3]  Carlos J. Suarez,et al.  Forebody vortex control on an F/A-18 using small, rotatable 'tip-strakes' , 1993 .

[4]  Carlos J. Suarez,et al.  Forebody vortex control with jet and slot blowing on an F/A-18 , 1993 .

[5]  G. N. Malcolm,et al.  Forebody Vortex Manipulation for Aerodynamic Control of Aircraft at High Angles of Attack , 1989 .

[6]  Wendy R. Lanser,et al.  Wind tunnel measurements on a full-scale F/A-18 with forebody slot blowing or forebody strakes , 1993 .

[7]  Carlos J. Suarez,et al.  Forebody vortex control with miniature, rotatable nose-boom strakes , 1992 .

[8]  W. L. Ely,et al.  A sensitivity study for pneumatic vortex control on a chined forebody , 1993 .

[9]  D. J. Peake,et al.  Control of forebody three-dimensional flow separations , 1979 .

[10]  Kenneth Wurtzler Numerical analysis of a chined forebody with asymmetric strakes , 1993 .

[11]  Joseph Krumenacker,et al.  Flight simulation and data analysis during a high angle of attack vortex flow control flight test program , 1992 .

[12]  Gerald N. Malcolm,et al.  Aerodynamic control using forebody strakes , 1991 .

[13]  William G. Sewall,et al.  Forebody vortex flow control on the F-16C using tangential slot and jet nozzle blowing , 1992 .

[14]  Gerald N. Malcolm,et al.  Aerodynamic control using forebody blowing and suction , 1991 .

[15]  Robert Guyton,et al.  X-29 forebody jet blowing , 1992 .

[16]  Daniel G. Murri,et al.  Exploratory studies of actuated forebody strakes for yaw control at high angles of attack , 1987 .

[17]  W. Davis,et al.  Numerical study of asymmetric air injection to control high angle-of-attack forebody vortices on the X-29 aircraft , 1990 .

[18]  Gerald N. Malcolm,et al.  Aerodynamic control of fighter aircraft by manipulation of forebody vortices , 1991 .

[19]  Gerald N. Malcolm Forebody vortex control , 1991 .