Managing Multiple UAVs through a Timeline Display

Network-centric operations, in which both automated and human entities are linked in order to leverage information superiority, will bring increases in available information sources, volume of information and operational tempo, placing higher cognitive demands on operators. In the future vision of allowing a single operator to control multiple unmanned vehicles (which could be on land, in the air, or under water), it is not well understood how operators will manage multiple vehicles, what kind of decision support can compliment operators, and how human cognitive limitations will impact overall system effectiveness. To this end, this paper presents the results of an experiment in which an operator simultaneously managed four highly autonomous UAVs executing an air tasking order, with the overall goal of destroying a predetermined set of targets within a limited time period. The primary factors under investigation were different levels of automation from manual to management-by-exception represented in a timeline, as well as different levels of replanning which are needed in time-sensitive targeting scenarios. Increasing levels of automation can reduce workload but they can also result in situation awareness degradation as well as automation bias. Results demonstrate that operators became fixated on the need to globally optimize their schedules and did not adequately weigh uncertainty in their decisions. This fixation significantly degraded operator performance to the point that operators without any decision support performed better than those with probabilistic prediction information and the ability to negotiate potential outcomes.

[1]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[2]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Using Interference Models to Predict Performance in a Multiple-Task UAV Environment - 2 UAVs , 2003 .

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[4]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement , 1988 .

[5]  Kathleen L. Mosier,et al.  Does automation bias decision-making? , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Dynamic Decisions and Work Load in Multitask Supervisory Control , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Workload Demands of Remotely Piloted Vehicle Supervision and Control: (1) Single Vehicle Performance , 2002 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[9]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Overconfidence, Preview, and Probability in Strategic Planning , 1991 .

[10]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[11]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[12]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[13]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  TASKILLAN II: Pilot Strategies for Workload Management , 1990 .

[14]  Heath A. Ruff,et al.  Human Interaction with Levels of Automation and Decision-Aid Fidelity in the Supervisory Control of Multiple Simulated Unmanned Air Vehicles , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[15]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Human optimization with moving optima , 1989 .

[16]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  The Need for Command and Control Instant Message Adaptive Interfaces: Lessons Learned from Tactical Tomahawk Human-in-the-Loop Simulations , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[17]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators , 1978 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[19]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Design of Automation for Telerobots and the Effect on Performance, Operator Situation Awareness, and Subjective Workload , 2000 .

[20]  Philip J. Smith,et al.  Design of a Cooperative Problem-Solving System for En-Route Flight Planning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994 .

[21]  Penelope M. Sanderson,et al.  The Human Planning and Scheduling Role in Advanced Manufacturing Systems: An Emerging Human Factors Domain , 1989 .

[22]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Automation Bias in Intelligent Time Critical Decision Support Systems , 2004 .

[23]  Howard Margolis,et al.  Simple heuristics that make us dumb , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  Stephanie Guerlain INTERACTIVE ADVISORY SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[25]  Ravi S. Adapathya,et al.  Strategic Behavior, Workload, and Performance in Task Scheduling , 1991 .