Electron microscopic observations on the soft tissue around clinical long-term percutaneous titanium implants.

Percutaneous implants of titanium ad modum Brånemark have been in clinical use in the head and neck since 1977. The incidence of adverse reactions is low. In a previous study we have demonstrated the presence of inflammatory cells in the subcutaneous connective tissue surrounding the implants and this increased exposure to exogenous antigens was suggested to be compensated by a barrier of inflammatory cells in the soft tissue. To get further information on the nature of the tissue-implant contact, in the present study we have examined the structure of the tissue close to the percutaneous implant using transmission electron microscopy. We could not see evidence for an attachment of the epithelium to the implant, nor between the connective tissue and the implant. Retrieved implants were also analysed and we did not find any organized tissue remaining on the implants.

[1]  G. Seymour,et al.  Immunohistologic analysis of the inflammatory infiltrates associated with osseointegrated implants. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  F Sutter,et al.  The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. , 1981, Journal of maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  M. Listgarten,et al.  Ultrastructure of the intact interface between an endosseous epoxy resin dental implant and the host tissues. , 1975, Journal de biologie buccale.

[4]  L. Bjursten,et al.  Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study on skin-penetrating titanium implants used for bone-anchored auricular prostheses. , 1987, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  G. Seymour,et al.  Immunohistological analysis of experimental gingivitis in humans. , 1988, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[6]  M. Listgarten,et al.  Electron microscopic study of the gingivo-dental junction of man. , 1966, The American journal of anatomy.

[7]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.

[8]  L. Bjursten,et al.  Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids. , 1988, The American journal of otology.

[9]  P. Thomsen,et al.  The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. , 1991, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Textbook of clinical periodontology , 1989 .

[11]  D. Brunette,et al.  The attachment mechanism of epithelial cells to titanium in vitro. , 1981, Journal of periodontal research.

[12]  T. Waris,et al.  Cold injury of the rat skin. A fluorescence histochemical study of adrenergic nerves, mast cells and patency of cutaneous blood vessels. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  D. Steflik,et al.  The epithelium dental implant interface. , 1988, The Journal of oral implantology.

[14]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Method for ultrastructural studies of the intact tissue-metal interface. , 1990, Biomaterials.

[15]  J. Parkin.  Percutaneous pedestal in cochlear implantation. , 1990, Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology.

[16]  P. Branemark,et al.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery. Supplementum.

[17]  J M Anderson,et al.  Inflammatory response to implants. , 1988, ASAIO transactions.

[18]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Experimental gingivitis in young dogs. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[19]  A Tjellström,et al.  Osseointegrated implants for replacement of absent or defective ears. , 1990, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[20]  L. Bjursten,et al.  Clinical, immunological and bacteriological evaluation of adverse reactions to skin‐penetrating titanium implants in the head and neck region , 1992, Contact dermatitis.