Adaptive diagrams: Handing control over to the learner to manage split-attention online

Based on cognitive load theory, it is well known that when studying a diagram that includes explanatory text, optimal learning occurs when the text is physically positioned close to the diagram as it eliminates the need for learners to split their attention between the two sources of information. What is not known is the effect on learning when learners manage split-attention for themselves when presented with a separated diagram and explanatory text. This study focuses on this new research direction by examining how learners can self-manage cognitive load through the physical manipulation of digital materials. Physical manipulation refers to moving text objects in digital materials to connect related pieces of textual information to a diagram, thus adapting the diagram to reduce split-attention. Fifty-two university students participated in one of two experiments. Experiment 1 (N = 34) investigated whether learners who were guided to self-manage split-attention by moving text objects on a screen displaying instructional material with evident split-attention were able to reduce split-attention and thus outperform learners who were provided split-source materials. Experiment 2 (N = 18) collected verbal think-aloud protocols to uncover the students' learning processes with the materials. Results confirmed the split-attention effect thus replicating this effect in a digital domain. Furthermore, whilst the self-managed condition did not significantly outperform the split-attention condition, the added task for learners to move text boxes to relevant aspects of the diagram did not have an adverse effect on learning, as the self-managed condition performed as well as (and for a recall task slightly better than) the split-attention condition. The verbal protocols highlighted that in order for learners to successfully self-manage split-attention training and guidance needs to be more extensive and explicit. Implications for further research for this new research direction in cognitive load theory are discussed.

[1]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[2]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Controlling split attention and redundancy in physical therapy instruction , 2008 .

[3]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  Split-attention and redundancy effects on mobile learning in physical environments , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Expertise reversal effect in using explanatory notes for readers of Shakespearean text , 2010 .

[5]  R. Mayer,et al.  Does the modality principle for multimedia learning apply to science classrooms , 2007 .

[6]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[7]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[8]  T. Gog,et al.  Optimising worked example instruction: Different ways to increase germane cognitive load. , 2006 .

[9]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[10]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[11]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load While Learning to Use a Computer Program , 1996 .

[12]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[13]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Managing One's Own Cognitive Load when Evidence of Split Attention is Present , 2012 .

[14]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory and music instruction , 2008 .

[15]  Sharon K Tindall-Ford,et al.  When two sensory modes are better than one , 1997 .

[16]  Paul Ginns Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects , 2006 .

[17]  D. Leutner,et al.  Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[18]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[19]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Techniques That Reduce Extraneous Cognitive Load and Manage Intrinsic Cognitive Load during Multimedia Learning , 2010 .

[20]  Paul Ginns Meta-Analysis of the Modality Effect. , 2005 .

[21]  John Sweller,et al.  Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load , 2005 .

[22]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Paul Chandler,et al.  The effect of written text on comprehension of spoken English as a foreign language. , 2007, The American journal of psychology.

[24]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[25]  P. Chandler,et al.  THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION , 1992 .

[26]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[27]  Shirley Agostinho,et al.  Adaptive Diagrams: A Research Agenda to Explore How Learners Can Manipulate Online Diagrams to Self-Manage Cognitive Load , 2014, Handbook of Human Centric Visualization.

[28]  Liesbeth Kester,et al.  The management of cognitive load during complex cognitive skill acquisition by means of computer-simulated problem solving. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[29]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  J. Payne Thinking Aloud: Insights Into Information Processing , 1994 .

[31]  F. Paas Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. , 1992 .

[32]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: New Conceptualizations, Specifications, and Integrated Research Perspectives , 2010 .

[33]  John Sweller,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Split-Attention Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[34]  Katherine A. Austin Multimedia learning: Cognitive individual differences and display design techniques predict transfer learning with multimedia learning modules , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[35]  John Sweller,et al.  The Mirror Neuron System and Observational Learning: Implications for the Effectiveness of Dynamic Visualizations , 2009 .

[36]  R. A. Tarmizi,et al.  Guidance during Mathematical Problem Solving. , 1988 .