Comprehensive nonlinear seismic performance assessment of MR damper controlled systems using virtual real‐time hybrid simulation

[1]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Semiactive Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative Study , 2000 .

[2]  R. Karami Mohammadi,et al.  Optimum strength distribution for seismic resistant shear buildings , 2004 .

[3]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Seismic Analysis of Meloland Road Overcrossing Using Multiplatform Simulation Software Including SSI , 2008 .

[4]  Azin Ghaffary,et al.  TADAS dampers in very large deformations , 2017 .

[5]  Justin D. Marshall,et al.  Feasibility study of a gap damper to control seismic isolator displacements in extreme earthquakes , 2013 .

[6]  Richard Christenson,et al.  Large-Scale Experimental Verification of Semiactive Control through Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2008 .

[7]  George Nikolakopoulos,et al.  Posicast control of structures using MR dampers , 2016 .

[8]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Direct performance-based design with 200kN MR dampers using multi-objective cost effective optimization for steel MRFs , 2014 .

[9]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Real-time on-line test for MDOF systems , 1999 .

[10]  Jong Wha Bai,et al.  Seismic fragility estimates of a moment-resisting frame building controlled by MR dampers using performance-based design , 2016 .

[11]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Numerical Modeling of a Servohydraulic Testing System for Structures , 2001 .

[12]  Hong Pan,et al.  Optimal Design of Active Tuned Mass Dampers for Mitigating Translational–Torsional Motion of Irregular Buildings , 2017 .

[13]  Azin Ghaffary,et al.  Framework for virtual hybrid simulation of TADAS frames using opensees and abaqus , 2018 .

[14]  Chia-Ming Chang,et al.  Real‐time hybrid testing with equivalent force control method incorporating Kalman filter , 2011 .

[15]  A. P. Zandi,et al.  Effect of filler material on local and global behaviour of buckling‐restrained braces , 2011 .

[16]  Arun Prakash,et al.  Establishing a predictive performance indicator for real‐time hybrid simulation , 2014 .

[17]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Linear dynamic modeling of a uni‐axial servo‐hydraulic shaking table system , 2000 .

[18]  Xiuyu Gao,et al.  Real time hybrid simulation: from dynamic system, motion control to experimental error , 2013 .

[19]  Hetao Hou,et al.  Improving inter-story drift distribution of steel moment resisting frames through stiff rocking cores , 2016 .

[20]  Y. Namita,et al.  Real‐time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation and its application to a piping system with energy absorber , 1999 .

[21]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Model-Based Feedforward-Feedback Actuator Control for Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2013 .

[22]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Comparative Studies of Semiactive Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Pure Simulation and Real-Time Hybrid Tests , 2013 .

[23]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Analysis of hybrid viscous damper by real time hybrid simulations , 2016 .

[24]  Amin Maghareh,et al.  Parametric identification of a servo-hydraulic actuator for real-time hybrid simulation , 2014 .

[25]  James M. Ricles,et al.  Large-scale real-time hybrid simulation for evaluation of advanced damping system performance , 2015 .

[26]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction , 1996 .

[27]  Hyung-Jo Jung,et al.  Semi‐active fuzzy control for seismic response reduction using magnetorheological dampers , 2004 .