Performance of laser sintered Ti–6Al–4V implants with bone-inspired porosity and micro/nanoscale surface roughness in the rabbit femur

Long term success of bone-interfacing implants remains a challenge in compromised patients and in areas of low bone quality. While surface roughness at the micro/nanoscale can promote osteogenesis, macro-scale porosity is important for promoting mechanical stability of the implant over time. Currently, machining techniques permit pores to be placed throughout the implant, but the pores are generally uniform in dimension. The advent of laser sintering provides a way to design and manufacture implants with specific porosity and variable dimensions at high resolution. This approach enables production of metal implants that mimic complex geometries found in biology. In this study, we used a rabbit femur model to compare osseointegration of laser sintered solid and porous implants. Ti-6Al-4V implants were laser sintered in a clinically relevant size and shape. One set of implants had a novel porosity based on human trabecular bone; both sets had grit-blasted/acid-etched surfaces. After characterization, implants were inserted transaxially into rabbit femora; mechanical testing, micro-computed tomography (microCT) and histomorphometry were conducted 10 weeks post-operatively. There were no differences in pull-out strength or bone-to-implant contact. However, both microCT and histomorphometry showed significantly higher new bone volume for porous compared to solid implants. Bone growth was observed into porous implant pores, especially near apical portions of the implant interfacing with cortical bone. These results show that laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V implants with micro/nanoscale surface roughness and trabecular bone-inspired porosity promote bone growth and may be used as a superior alternative to solid implants for bone-interfacing implants.

[1]  P. Eggli,et al.  Porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate cylinders with two different pore size ranges implanted in the cancellous bone of rabbits. A comparative histomorphometric and histologic study of bony ingrowth and implant substitution. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  L. Nolte,et al.  Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  Barbara D Boyan,et al.  Additively manufactured 3D porous Ti-6Al-4V constructs mimic trabecular bone structure and regulate osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and local factor production in a porosity and surface roughness dependent manner , 2014, Biofabrication.

[4]  R. Tannenbaum,et al.  The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[5]  T. Matsuura,et al.  Distinct Characteristics of Mandibular Bone Collagen Relative to Long Bone Collagen: Relevance to Clinical Dentistry , 2014, BioMed research international.

[6]  R. Tannenbaum,et al.  The roles of titanium surface micro/nanotopography and wettability on the differential response of human osteoblast lineage cells. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[7]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Animal Research: Reporting in vivo Experiments—The ARRIVE Guidelines , 2011, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[8]  B. Boyan,et al.  Role of integrin α2 β1 in mediating osteoblastic differentiation on three-dimensional titanium scaffolds with submicron-scale texture. , 2015, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[9]  Barbara D. Boyan,et al.  Laser-Sintered Constructs with Bio-inspired Porosity and Surface Micro/Nano-Roughness Enhance Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation and Matrix Mineralization In Vitro , 2016, Calcified Tissue International.

[10]  P. Moy,et al.  Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  P. Coulthard,et al.  Bone Quality: A Reality for the Process of Osseointegration , 2009, Implant dentistry.

[12]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[13]  R M Pilliar,et al.  Osteogenic phenomena across endosteal bone-implant spaces with porous surfaced intramedullary implants. , 1981, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[14]  J. Wozney,et al.  Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Increases the Rate of Callus Formation after Fracture of the Rabbit Tibia , 1999, Calcified Tissue International.

[15]  Barbara D Boyan,et al.  Enhanced Osteoblast Response to Porosity and Resolution of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Constructs with Trabeculae-Inspired Porosity. , 2016, 3D printing and additive manufacturing.

[16]  B. Boyan,et al.  Novel Osteogenic Ti-6Al-4V Device For Restoration Of Dental Function In Patients With Large Bone Deficiencies: Design, Development And Implementation , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[17]  A. Wennerberg,et al.  Bone ingrowth of various porous titanium scaffolds produced by a moldless and space holder technique: an in vivo study in rabbits , 2016, Biomedical materials.

[18]  Barbara D Boyan,et al.  Novel hydrophilic nanostructured microtexture on direct metal laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V surfaces enhances osteoblast response in vitro and osseointegration in a rabbit model. , 2016, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[19]  J. Davies,et al.  Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. , 2003, Journal of dental education.

[20]  Tomiharu Matsushita,et al.  Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment. , 2016, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[21]  Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments: The ARRIVE guidelines , 2010, Experimental physiology.

[22]  D Buser,et al.  What is This? Downloaded from jdr.sagepub.com at PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV on February 23, 2013 For personal use only. No other uses without permission. International and American Associations for Dental ResearchRESEARCH REPORTS , 2004 .

[23]  J. Grotowski,et al.  Prototypes for Bone Implant Scaffolds Designed via Topology Optimization and Manufactured by Solid Freeform Fabrication , 2010 .

[24]  Daniel J Berry,et al.  Orthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  B. Boyan,et al.  Implant Materials Generate Different Peri-implant Inflammatory Factors , 2015, Spine.

[26]  B. Boyan,et al.  A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces II: Biological and clinical aspects. , 2014, Acta biomaterialia.

[27]  D. Shafer,et al.  Guided vertical bone regeneration by means of roughened and alkaline treated titanium implant surfaces A comparison based on a rabbit mandible model , 2011 .

[28]  Elena Losina,et al.  Rates and Outcomes of Primary and Revision Total Hip Replacement in the United States Medicare Population , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  Hirohiko Suwa,et al.  Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability at the time of surgery--clinical, prospective, biomechanical, and imaging study. , 2005, Bone.

[30]  A. Singh,et al.  Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A review , 2009 .

[31]  V. Nacu,et al.  Vertical osteoconductive characteristics of titanium implants with calcium-phosphate-coated surfaces - a pilot study in rabbits. , 2014, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[32]  K. Sandhage,et al.  Differential responses of osteoblast lineage cells to nanotopographically-modified, microroughened titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy surfaces. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[33]  S. Matsuda,et al.  Title Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo , 2017 .