Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening.

PURPOSE To assess a schema for estimating the risk of radiation-induced breast cancer following exposure of the breast to ionizing radiation as would occur with mammography and to provide data that can be used to estimate the potential number of breast cancers, cancer deaths, and woman-years of life lost attributable to radiation exposure delivered according to a variety of screening scenarios. MATERIALS AND METHODS An excess absolute risk model was used to predict the number of radiation-induced breast cancers attributable to the radiation dose received for a single typical digital mammography examination. The algorithm was then extended to consider the consequences of various scenarios for routine screening beginning and ending at different ages, with examinations taking place at 1- or 2-year intervals. A life-table correction was applied to consider reductions of the cohort size over time owing to nonradiation-related causes of death. Finally, the numbers of breast cancer deaths and woman-years of life lost that might be attributable to the radiation exposure were calculated. Cancer incidence and cancer deaths were estimated for individual attained ages following the onset of screening, and lifetime risks were also calculated. RESULTS For a cohort of 100 000 women each receiving a dose of 3.7 mGy to both breasts and who were screened annually from age 40 to 55 years and biennially thereafter to age 74 years, it is predicted that there will be 86 cancers induced and 11 deaths due to radiation-induced breast cancer. CONCLUSION For the mammographic screening regimens considered that begin at age 40 years, this risk is small compared with the expected mortality reduction achievable through screening. The risk of radiation-induced breast cancer should not be a deterrent from mammographic screening of women over the age of 40 years.

[1]  L. Tabár,et al.  Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening , 2003, The Lancet.

[2]  M. Charles,et al.  Mammography—oncogenecity at low doses , 2009, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[3]  Michael Waller,et al.  Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial , 2006, The Lancet.

[4]  I. Olivotto,et al.  Impact of changing from annual to biennial mammographic screening on breast cancer outcomes in women aged 50–79 in British Columbia , 2008, Journal of medical screening.

[5]  A. Berrington de González,et al.  Mammographic screening before age 50 years in the UK: comparison of the radiation risks with the mortality benefits , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  K C Young,et al.  Radiation doses received in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 2001 and 2002. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  T. Yoshizumi,et al.  Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007. , 2009, Radiology.

[8]  R E Hendrick,et al.  Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[9]  P. Goss,et al.  Current perspectives on radiation-induced breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Erik Holmberg,et al.  Radiation Effects on Breast Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Cohorts , 2002, Radiation research.

[12]  A. Coldman,et al.  Breast cancer mortality after screening mammography in British Columbia women , 2006, International journal of cancer.