Comparison of six electromyography acquisition setups on hand movement classification tasks

Hand prostheses controlled by surface electromyography are promising due to the non-invasive approach and the control capabilities offered by machine learning. Nevertheless, dexterous prostheses are still scarcely spread due to control difficulties, low robustness and often prohibitive costs. Several sEMG acquisition setups are now available, ranging in terms of costs between a few hundred and several thousand dollars. The objective of this paper is the relative comparison of six acquisition setups on an identical hand movement classification task, in order to help the researchers to choose the proper acquisition setup for their requirements. The acquisition setups are based on four different sEMG electrodes (including Otto Bock, Delsys Trigno, Cometa Wave + Dormo ECG and two Thalmic Myo armbands) and they were used to record more than 50 hand movements from intact subjects with a standardized acquisition protocol. The relative performance of the six sEMG acquisition setups is compared on 41 identical hand movements with a standardized feature extraction and data analysis pipeline aimed at performing hand movement classification. Comparable classification results are obtained with three acquisition setups including the Delsys Trigno, the Cometa Wave and the affordable setup composed of two Myo armbands. The results suggest that practical sEMG tests can be performed even when costs are relevant (e.g. in small laboratories, developing countries or use by children). All the presented datasets can be used for offline tests and their quality can easily be compared as the data sets are publicly available.

[1]  Finley Fr,et al.  Myocoder studies of multiple myopotential response. , 1967 .

[2]  Ilja Kuzborskij,et al.  Characterization of a Benchmark Database for Myoelectric Movement Classification , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Dario Farina,et al.  Design of a Subject-Specific EMG Model for Rehabilitation Movement , 2014 .

[4]  Paavo V. Komi,et al.  EMG frequency spectrum, muscle structure, and fatigue during dynamic contractions in man , 1979, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[5]  Marie-Françoise Lucas,et al.  Multi-channel surface EMG classification using support vector machines and signal-based wavelet optimization , 2008, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[6]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Electromyography data for non-invasive naturally-controlled robotic hand prostheses , 2014, Scientific Data.

[7]  T. Kuiken,et al.  The effect of subcutaneous fat on myoelectric signal amplitude and cross-talk , 2003, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  Fei-Fei Li,et al.  What Does Classifying More Than 10, 000 Image Categories Tell Us? , 2010, ECCV.

[9]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  C Myers,et al.  The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. Official publication of The American Occupational Therapy Association. , 1971, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[12]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Electromyography Low Pass Filtering Effects on the Classification of Hand Movements in Amputated Subjects , 2014 .

[13]  S Micera,et al.  Control of Hand Prostheses Using Peripheral Information , 2010, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Ilja Kuzborskij,et al.  On the challenge of classifying 52 hand movements from surface electromyography , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  Blair A. Lock,et al.  A Real-Time Pattern Recognition Based Myoelectric Control Usability Study Implemented in a Virtual Environment , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[16]  O. Stavdahl,et al.  Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: Terminology and Proportional Myoelectric Control—A Review , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  A. M. Hager,et al.  Effect of clinical parameters on the control of myoelectric robotic prosthetic hands. , 2016, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  Dario Farina,et al.  The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Movement Error Rate for Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for sEMG-Based Hand Movement Classification , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  Dario Farina,et al.  Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Conditioning and Sampling Issues of EMG Signals in Motion Recognition of Multifunctional Myoelectric Prostheses , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Werner Wolf,et al.  Onset Detection in Surface Electromyographic Signals: A Systematic Comparison of Methods , 2001, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[23]  Bruce C. Wheeler,et al.  EMG feature evaluation for movement control of upper extremity prostheses , 1995 .

[24]  S. Edwards,et al.  Developmental and functional hand grasps , 2002 .

[25]  Erik Scheme,et al.  Electromyogram pattern recognition for control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  Nitish V. Thakor,et al.  Decoding of Individuated Finger Movements Using Surface Electromyography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  F. Finley,et al.  Myocoder studies of multiple myopotential response. , 1967, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[29]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Surface EMG in advanced hand prosthetics , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.

[31]  Henning Müller,et al.  Overview of the CLEF 2009 Medical Image Retrieval Track , 2009, CLEF.

[32]  N. Kamakura,et al.  Patterns of static prehension in normal hands. , 1980, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[33]  Dario Farina,et al.  Intuitive, Online, Simultaneous, and Proportional Myoelectric Control Over Two Degrees-of-Freedom in Upper Limb Amputees , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[34]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Control Capabilities of Myoelectric Robotic Prostheses by Hand Amputees: A Scientific Research and Market Overview , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[35]  M Lidierth A computer based method for automated measurement of the periods of muscular activity from an EMG and its application to locomotor EMGs. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[37]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  Advances in surface EMG: recent progress in detection and processing techniques. , 2010, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[38]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Extracting Simultaneous and Proportional Neural Control Information for Multiple-DOF Prostheses From the Surface Electromyographic Signal , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks , 1989, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[40]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Networks Applied to Electromyography Data: A Resource for the Classification of Movements for Prosthetic Hands , 2016, Front. Neurorobot..

[41]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  The 2005 PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge , 2005, MLCW.

[42]  M. Abdoli-Eramaki,et al.  The effect of perspiration on the sEMG amplitude and power spectrum. , 2012, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[43]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  The Pascal Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge , 2010, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[44]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[45]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A wavelet-based continuous classification scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[46]  Barbara Caputo,et al.  Classification of hand movements in amputated subjects by sEMG and accelerometers , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.