Assessing In-vivo IVUS Tissue Classification accuracy between Normalized Image Reconstruction and RF Analysis

In this paper we present a novel framework for classification of the different kind of tissues in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data. We describe a normalized reconstruction process for IVUS images from radio frequency (RF) signals. The reconstructed data is described in terms of texture based features and feeds an ECOC-Adaboost learning process. In the same manner, the RF signals are characterized using Autoregressive models, and classified with a similar learning process. A comparison is performed among these techniques using two different cross validations schemes: 50 rounds of 90-10-Holdout and Leave One Patient Out obtaining very promising results.

[1]  T S Ikonen,et al.  Feasibility of in vivo intravascular ultrasound tissue characterization in the detection of early vascular transplant rejection. , 1999, Circulation.

[2]  Oriol Pujol Vila A Semi-Supervised Statistical Framework and Generative Snakes for IVUS Analysis , 2004 .

[3]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[5]  Fuyun Ling,et al.  Advanced Digital Signal Processing , 1992 .

[6]  J. Daugman Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  M. Yoshizawa,et al.  Coronary plaque classification through intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis using self-organizing map , 2005, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2005..

[8]  Petia Radeva,et al.  Intravascular Ultrasound Images Vessel Characterization Using AdaBoost , 2003, FIMH.

[9]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Assessing spectral algorithms to predict atherosclerotic plaque composition with normalized and raw intravascular ultrasound data. , 2001, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[10]  E.E. Pissaloux,et al.  Image Processing , 1994, Proceedings. Second Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing.

[11]  Robert E. Schapire,et al.  The Boosting Approach to Machine Learning An Overview , 2003 .

[12]  Y. Freund,et al.  Discussion of the Paper \additive Logistic Regression: a Statistical View of Boosting" By , 2000 .

[13]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Coronary Plaque Classification With Intravascular Ultrasound Radiofrequency Data Analysis , 2002, Circulation.

[14]  Trygve Randen,et al.  Filtering for Texture Classification: A Comparative Study , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Reducing Multiclass to Binary: A Unifying Approach for Margin Classifiers , 2000, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[16]  Richard C. Dubes,et al.  Performance evaluation for four classes of textural features , 1992, Pattern Recognit..