Effects of discount framing in comparative price advertising

Purpose – The objective of this paper is to examine the framing effects of discount presentation format in comparative price advertising in a low‐price and a high‐price product context. In particular, the authors study whether identical discounts presented in percentage and absolute terms result in different consumer perceptions of transaction value and purchase intention. Although price promotions have been the subject of previous research, a closer examination of the potential moderating influence of discount size in both contexts is warranted.Design/methodology/approach – Two separate experiments were designed to isolate the effects of the manner in which discounts are numerically expressed and the size of the discount on consumers' perceptions of a retail price promotion in a low‐price and a high‐price product context.Findings – The effects of discount framing in comparative price promotions are found to be influenced by discount size in the case of the low‐product context but not the high‐price one.R...

[1]  Schneider,et al.  All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[2]  Janet Hoek,et al.  Message framing effects on price discounting , 2006 .

[3]  Kent B. Monroe,et al.  The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers' perceptions and purchase intentions , 1998 .

[4]  Amit Sharma,et al.  Communicating Price Information through Semantic Cues: The Moderating Effects of Situation and Discount Size , 1996 .

[5]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Analysis of Experimental Data , 1994 .

[6]  William O. Bearden,et al.  Influences on What Consumers Know and What They Think They Know Regarding Marketer Pricing Tactics , 2007 .

[7]  Peggy A. Hite,et al.  Framing, gender and tax compliance , 2003 .

[8]  Ram N. Aditya,et al.  The psychology of deception in marketing: A conceptual framework for research and practice , 2001 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[10]  Richard H. Thaler,et al.  Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice , 1985, Mark. Sci..

[11]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[12]  P. Rajan Varadarajan,et al.  Consumer Responses to Small Business Coupon Sales Promotions , 1984 .

[13]  K. B. Monroe Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions , 1990 .

[14]  James F. Devlin,et al.  A study of time limited price promotions , 2007 .

[15]  Louise A. Heslop,et al.  Reference Prices and Deception in Newspaper Advertising , 1985 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[17]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Comparative Price Advertising: Informative or Deceptive? , 1992 .

[18]  K. B. Monroe,et al.  The Effects of Price - Comparison Advertising on Buyers'''' Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transa , 1998 .

[19]  Edward Blair,et al.  The Effects of Reference Prices in Retail Advertisements , 1981 .

[20]  John P. Robinson,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – Criteria for Scale Selection and Evaluation , 1991 .

[21]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[22]  D. Frisch Reasons for framing effects. , 1993 .

[23]  William O. Bearden,et al.  Consumer evaluations of different promotion types and price presentations: the moderating role of promotional benefit level , 2003 .

[24]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Assimilation of advertised reference prices: the moderating role of involvement , 2003 .

[25]  J. E. Swan,et al.  An application of the elaboration likelihood model , 1990 .

[26]  K. B. Monroe,et al.  Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisements , 1981 .

[27]  Rajesh Chandrashekaran,et al.  The influence of redundant comparison prices and other price presentation formats on consumers’ evaluations and purchase intentions , 2004 .

[28]  E. Berkowitz,et al.  Contextual Influences on Consumer Price Responses: An Experimental Analysis , 1980 .

[29]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  Consumer Normal Price Estimation: Market versus Personal Standards , 1991 .

[30]  J. Inman,et al.  Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal Value , 1997 .

[31]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[32]  Timothy B. Heath,et al.  Mental Accounting and Changes in Price: The Frame Dependence of Reference Dependence , 1995 .

[33]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Market Price Variation, Perceived Price Variation, and Consumers' Price Search Decisions for Durable Goods , 1994 .

[34]  Lee G. Cooper,et al.  The Discounting of Discounts and Promotion Thresholds , 1992 .

[35]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Comparative Price Advertising: An Integrative Review , 1998 .

[36]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  A Study of Information Search Behavior during the Categorization of New Products , 1992 .

[37]  Richard A. Briesch,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Price Presentation on Perceived Savings , 2002 .

[38]  Scot Burton,et al.  The Effect of Semantic Cues on Consumer Perceptions of Reference Price Ads , 1991 .

[39]  G. Tellis,et al.  Contextual and Temporal Components of Reference Price , 1994 .

[40]  Indrajit Sinha,et al.  Consumers' perceptions of promotional framing of price , 2000 .

[41]  Dan C. Weilbaker,et al.  The Effect of Plausible and Exaggerated Reference Prices on Consumer Perceptions and Price Search , 1988 .

[42]  Kent B. Monroe,et al.  Measuring Price Thresholds by Psychophysics and Latitudes of Acceptance , 1971 .