Market regulation and planning action: burying the impact of electricity networks?

One of the key dilemmas in environmental governance is how to articulate the uneven and intangible qualities of environment (often expressed through land‐use planning) with the dominant objectives of key economic sectors. In this article, these dilemmas are explored by examining the interaction in Britain between the planning system and electricity distribution companies around the long‐running issue of undergrounding, i.e. could companies reduce the visual intrusiveness of their overhead networks by placing more lines underground, especially in valued landscape areas? The research shows that although the consents process, development plans and collaborative endeavours all provide apertures for influencing investment, in most instances companies underground their rural networks to the extent that it fits with their technical and economic priorities. Improving locally embedded partnerships between the main actors is unlikely to change this position significantly. The challenge is to bridge the institutional dislocation between the ‘case‐by‐case approach’ to addressing the environmental impacts of overhead lines in the planning system and the largely a‐contextual, economic imperatives of national market regulation.

[1]  Susan Owens,et al.  Energy, Participation and Planning: The Case of Electricity Generation in Great Britain , 1985 .

[2]  George A. Goulty Visual amenity aspects of high voltage transmission , 1990 .

[3]  F. Ennis Infrastructure Provision and the Negotiating Process , 2003 .

[4]  Simon Marvin,et al.  Demand-side management in the electricity sector , 1995 .

[5]  S. Jay,et al.  The emergence of local planning authority policy on high-voltage electricity issues , 2002 .

[6]  P. Degeling THE SIGNIFICANCE OF 'SECTORS' IN CALLS FOR URBAN PUBLIC HEALTH INTERSECTORALISM: an Australian perspective , 1995 .

[7]  D. Lidgate Questions of Power: Electricity and Environment in Inter-War Britain , 1991 .

[8]  Maarten A. Hajer,et al.  The Politics of Environmental Discourse , 1997 .

[9]  Jonathan Murdoch,et al.  The Spatialization of Politics: Local and National Actor-Spaces in Environmental Conflict , 1995 .

[10]  Amanda Wragg Towards Sustainable Landscape Planning: Experiences from the Wye Valley Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty , 2000 .

[11]  Simon Marvin,et al.  Infrastructure Provision, Development Processes and the Co-production of Environmental Value , 1997 .

[12]  Robert L. Thayer,et al.  Gray World, Green Heart: Technology, Nature, and the Sustainable Landscape , 1993 .

[13]  Jonathan Murdoch,et al.  Space Against Time: Competing Rationalities in Planning for Housing , 2000 .

[14]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Reframing Policy Discourse , 2020, The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning.

[15]  Simon Marvin,et al.  Disconnected Policy: The Shaping of Local Energy Management , 1996 .

[16]  P. Bachrach,et al.  Two Faces of Power , 1962, American Political Science Review.

[17]  A. Blowers The triumph of material interests— Geography, pollution and the environment , 1984 .

[18]  J. Sheail The amenity clause: an insight into half a century of environmental protection in the United Kingdom , 1992 .

[19]  Bill Edwards,et al.  Partnerships, Power, and Scale in Rural Governance , 2001 .

[20]  Simon Marvin,et al.  Electricity in the Marketplace: Reconfiguring the Consumption of Essential Resources , 1998 .

[21]  K. Cox Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics , 1998 .