PATH: a work sampling-based approach to ergonomic job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work.

A high prevalence and incidence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders have been reported in construction work. Unlike industrial production-line activity, construction work, as well as work in many other occupations (e.g. agriculture, mining), is non-repetitive in nature; job tasks are non-cyclic, or consist of long or irregular cycles. PATH (Posture, Activity, Tools and Handling), a work sampling-based approach, was developed to characterize the ergonomic hazards of construction and other non-repetitive work. The posture codes in the PATH method are based on the Ovako Work Posture Analysing System (OWAS), with other codes included for describing worker activity, tool use, loads handled and grasp type. For heavy highway construction, observations are stratified by construction stage and operation, using a taxonomy developed specifically for this purpose. Observers can code the physical characteristics of the job reliably after about 30 h of training. A pilot study of six construction laborers during four road construction operations suggests that laborers spend large proportions of time in nonneutral trunk postures and spend approximately 20% of their time performing manual material handling tasks. These results demonstrate how the PATH method can be used to identify specific construction operations and tasks that are ergonomically hazardous.

[1]  P Susi,et al.  Ergonomics and construction: a review of potential hazards in new construction. , 1994, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[2]  O Karhu,et al.  Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. , 1977, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  O Karhu,et al.  Observing working postures in industry: Examples of OWAS application. , 1981, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  T J Armstrong,et al.  Investigation of cumulative trauma disorders in a poultry processing plant. , 1982, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[5]  A. Burdorf,et al.  Comparison of methods for the assessment of postural load on the back. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[6]  W Karwowski,et al.  Analysis of working postures in hammering tasks on building construction sites using the computerized OWAS method. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  P Kivi,et al.  Analysis and improvement of work postures in the building industry: application of the computerised OWAS method. , 1991, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  W M Keyserling.  Postural analysis of the trunk and shoulders in simulated real time. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[9]  C. Wiktorin,et al.  Validity of self-reported exposures to work postures and manual materials handling. Stockholm MUSIC I Study Group. , 1993, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[10]  M Damlund,et al.  Low-back pain and early retirement among Danish semiskilled construction workers. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[11]  U. Moritz,et al.  Healthy lower backs in the construction industry in Sweden , 1993 .

[12]  Jörgen Winkel,et al.  Validity of self-reported exposures to work postures and manual materials handling , 1993 .

[13]  Ralph Mosser Barnes,et al.  Motion and Time Study: Design and Measurement of Work , 1968 .

[14]  W K Sieber,et al.  Job tasks, potential exposures, and health risks of laborers employed in the construction industry. , 1993, American journal of industrial medicine.

[15]  W. M. Keyserling,et al.  Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.