Detecting transient brain states of functional connectivity: A comparative study

Estimating functional connectivity (FC) has become an increasingly powerful tool for understanding our brain and investigating healthy and abnormal brain functions. Most previous studies assume temporal stationarity, such as correlation and data-driven decompositions computed across the whole duration of the acquisition. However, emerging evidence revealed the presence of temporal variability of FC, leading to increasing interest in estimating the dynamic Functional Connectivity (dFC). In this context, several approaches have been proposed in order to extract the relevant brain networks fluctuating over time. Still, a clear comparative study among the existing methods is needed. Thus, we aimed here to compare three dimensionality reduction techniques, specifically Independent Component Analysis (ICA), Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and generalized Canonical Correlation Analysis (gCCA), on two Magnetoencephalography (MEG) datasets recorded during motor and memory tasks. First, source connectivity combined with a sliding window approach was used in order to reconstruct the dynamic brain networks at the cortical level. Then, for each algorithm, we extracted the significant patterns of brain network connections with their associated time variation. Results show characteristic properties of each method in terms of computation time, reproducibility and potentiality in extracting the top dominant networks.

[1]  A Kabbara,et al.  The dynamic functional core network of the human brain at rest , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[3]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Temporally-independent functional modes of spontaneous brain activity , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives , 2017, NeuroImage.

[5]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Dynamic mode decomposition of resting-state and task fMRI , 2018, NeuroImage.

[6]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task , 2004, NeuroImage.

[7]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Discovering dynamic brain networks from big data in rest and task , 2017, NeuroImage.

[8]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[9]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Measurement of dynamic task related functional networks using MEG , 2017, NeuroImage.

[10]  P. Nunez,et al.  EEG and MEG coherence: Measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Spectrally resolved fast transient brain states in electrophysiological data , 2016, NeuroImage.

[12]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Principal components of functional connectivity: A new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest , 2013, NeuroImage.

[14]  C. Berrou,et al.  Dynamic reorganization of functional brain networks during picture naming , 2015, Cortex.

[15]  Motoaki Kawanabe,et al.  Characterizing Variability of Modular Brain Connectivity with Constrained Principal Component Analysis , 2016, PloS one.

[16]  Chong-sun Kim Canonical Analysis of Several Sets of Variables , 1973 .

[17]  F. Wendling,et al.  Detecting M/EEG modular brain states in rest and task , 2019, bioRxiv.

[18]  Aaron Kucyi,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity of the default mode network tracks daydreaming , 2014, NeuroImage.

[19]  Pierre Comon,et al.  Independent component analysis, A new concept? , 1994, Signal Process..

[20]  Kent A. Kiehl,et al.  A method for evaluating dynamic functional network connectivity and task-modulation: application to schizophrenia , 2010, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[21]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.