This paper uses numerical simulation to study the effects of Ga concentration profile on the performance of CuIn1−xGaxSe2 (CIGS) solar cell, including the effects of acceptor type Cu antisite defects whose concentration depends on Ga composition. These defects are the dominant deep traps in the CIGS material system. The concentration and spatial distribution of these traps affect the solar cell performance. The trap density model used in this work follows experimental reports in the literature. The trap concentration is 4.3×1015 cm−3 for CIS (x=0) and decreases to 1.2×1014 cm−3 when the Ga mole fraction, x, reaches 0.24. The trap concentration increases exponentially above x=0.30. Applying this model to solar cells with uniform composition absorber layer predicts that the power conversion efficiency reaches a maximum value of 14.6%, at x=0.24 and decreases with increasing Ga content above x=0.30, in good agreement with experimental results. When this model is used to simulate a solar cell where the Ga composition in the absorber layer is graded, the electric field produced by compositional grading improves the efficiency because of the reduced recombination rate. However compositions where x is higher than 0.45 lead to a drop in performance due to the high trap density and shorter lifetime. Both grading from the CdS/CIGS interface (forward grading), and back grading where the Ga concentration increases from the junction into the CIGS film were studied. In forward grading, the maximum efficiency is achieved when the Ga concentration is graded such that x decreases from 0.35 at the surface to 0.24 at 0.4 µm into the CIGS film. In back grading, the maximum efficiency is achieved when x increases from 0.45 at the surface to 0.5 at 0.4 µm into the CIGS film.
[1]
G. G. Stokes.
"J."
,
1890,
The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[2]
Miss A.O. Penney.
(b)
,
1974,
The New Yale Book of Quotations.
[3]
H. Schock,et al.
Prospects of wide-gap chalcopyrites for thin film photovoltaic modules
,
1997
.
[4]
A. Forchel,et al.
Minority-carrier lifetime and efficiency of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells
,
1998
.
[5]
A. Zunger,et al.
A phenomenological model for systematization and prediction of doping limits in II–VI and I–III–VI2 compounds
,
1998
.
[6]
H. Schock,et al.
Influence of the Ga-content on the bulk defect densities of Cu(In,Ga)Se2
,
2001
.
[7]
T. Anderson,et al.
Device modeling and simulation of CIS-based solar cells
,
2002,
Conference Record of the Twenty-Ninth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2002..
[8]
W. Shafarman,et al.
Optical characterization of CuIn1−xGaxSe2 alloy thin films by spectroscopic ellipsometry
,
2003
.
[9]
Rommel Noufi,et al.
Properties of 19.2% efficiency ZnO/CdS/CuInGaSe2 thin‐film solar cells
,
2003
.
[10]
M Henini,et al.
Semiconductors: Data Handbook: Otfried Madelung (Ed.); Springer, ISBN 3-540-40488-0
,
2004,
Microelectron. J..
[11]
U. Rau,et al.
Wide-Gap Chalcopyrites
,
2006
.
[12]
I. Repins,et al.
19·9%‐efficient ZnO/CdS/CuInGaSe2 solar cell with 81·2% fill factor
,
2008
.