Weak 5′-mRNA Secondary Structures in Short Eukaryotic Genes

Experimental studies of translation have found that short genes tend to exhibit greater densities of ribosomes than long genes in eukaryotic species. It remains an open question whether the elevated ribosome density on short genes is due to faster initiation or slower elongation dynamics. Here, we address this question computationally using 5′-mRNA folding energy as a proxy for translation initiation rates and codon bias as a proxy for elongation rates. We report a significant trend toward reduced 5′-secondary structure in shorter coding sequences, suggesting that short genes initiate faster during translation. We also find a trend toward higher 5′-codon bias in short genes, suggesting that short genes elongate faster than long genes. Both of these trends hold across a diverse set of eukaryotic taxa. Thus, the elevated ribosome density on short eukaryotic genes is likely caused by differential rates of initiation, rather than differential rates of elongation.

[1]  A. Giraldez,et al.  Ribosome Profiling Shows That miR-430 Reduces Translation Before Causing mRNA Decay in Zebrafish , 2012, Science.

[2]  Gene-Wei Li,et al.  The anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria , 2012, Nature.

[3]  Kevin E. Jia,et al.  Reduced mRNA Secondary-Structure Stability Near the Start Codon Indicates Functional Genes in Prokaryotes , 2011, Genome biology and evolution.

[4]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  High-Resolution View of the Yeast Meiotic Program Revealed by Ribosome Profiling , 2011, Science.

[5]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Evolution of 5' untranslated region length and gene expression reprogramming in yeasts. , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[6]  David W. Reid,et al.  Primary Role for Endoplasmic Reticulum-bound Ribosomes in Cellular Translation Identified by Ribosome Profiling* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  J. Weissman,et al.  Selective Ribosome Profiling Reveals the Cotranslational Chaperone Action of Trigger Factor In Vivo , 2011, Cell.

[8]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Ribosome Profiling of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Reveals the Complexity and Dynamics of Mammalian Proteomes , 2011, Cell.

[9]  C. Nicchitta,et al.  Polysome profiling of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. , 2011, Molecular and biochemical parasitology.

[10]  Isaac Meilijson,et al.  Genome-Scale Analysis of Translation Elongation with a Ribosome Flow Model , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  Michael A. Gilchrist,et al.  Explaining complex codon usage patterns with selection for translational efficiency, mutation bias, and genetic drift , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Gaston H. Gonnet,et al.  OMA 2011: orthology inference among 1000 complete genomes , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  J. Plotkin,et al.  Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[14]  C. Wilke,et al.  Reduced stability of mRNA secondary structure near the translation-initiation site in dsDNA viruses , 2011, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[15]  Michael A. Gilchrist,et al.  Effect of Correlated tRNA Abundances on Translation Errors and Evolution of Codon Usage Bias , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[16]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels , 2010, Nature.

[17]  Kai Zeng,et al.  Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  Y. Pilpel,et al.  An Evolutionarily Conserved Mechanism for Controlling the Efficiency of Protein Translation , 2010, Cell.

[19]  Eytan Ruppin,et al.  Translation efficiency is determined by both codon bias and folding energy , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Tong Zhou,et al.  A Universal Trend of Reduced mRNA Stability near the Translation-Initiation Site in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Q. Nie,et al.  Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallus , 2010, Biology Direct.

[22]  David G Hendrickson,et al.  Concordant Regulation of Translation and mRNA Abundance for Hundreds of Targets of a Human microRNA , 2009, PLoS biology.

[23]  Guy Perrière,et al.  Databases of homologous gene families for comparative genomics , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[24]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis in Vivo of Translation with Nucleotide Resolution Using Ribosome Profiling , 2009, Science.

[25]  David James Sherman,et al.  Génolevures: protein families and synteny among complete hemiascomycetous yeast proteomes and genomes , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  Reinhard Wolf,et al.  Coding-Sequence Determinants of Gene Expression in Escherichia coli , 2009 .

[27]  Ruth Hershberg,et al.  Selection on codon bias. , 2008, Annual review of genetics.

[28]  J. Mata,et al.  A Network of Multiple Regulatory Layers Shapes Gene Expression in Fission Yeast , 2007, Molecular cell.

[29]  Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S8 Table S1 Movies S1 to S3 a " Silent " Polymorphism in the Mdr1 Gene Changes Substrate Specificity Corrected 30 November 2007; See Last Page , 2022 .

[30]  G. Rubin,et al.  Global analyses of mRNA translational control during early Drosophila embryogenesis , 2007, Genome Biology.

[31]  Wolfgang Huber,et al.  A high-resolution map of transcription in the yeast genome. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  L. Hurst,et al.  Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[33]  Riki Kawaguchi,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of transcript abundance and translation in Arabidopsis seedlings subjected to oxygen deprivation. , 2005, Annals of botany.

[34]  L. Hurst,et al.  Evidence for selection on synonymous mutations affecting stability of mRNA secondary structure in mammals , 2005, Genome Biology.

[35]  Daniel Herschlag,et al.  Dissecting eukaryotic translation and its control by ribosome density mapping , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Adjusting for selection on synonymous sites in estimates of evolutionary distance. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[37]  Richard C Trembath,et al.  A synonymous SNP of the corneodesmosin gene leads to increased mRNA stability and demonstrates association with psoriasis across diverse ethnic groups. , 2004, Human molecular genetics.

[38]  P. Brown,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of mRNA lengths in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2003, Genome Biology.

[39]  E. Levanon,et al.  Human housekeeping genes are compact. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[40]  John D. Storey,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of mRNA translation profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  N. Saitou,et al.  Synonymous mutations in the human dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) affect mRNA stability and synthesis of the receptor. , 2003, Human molecular genetics.

[42]  Laurent Duret,et al.  Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[43]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[44]  Guido Rossum,et al.  Python Reference Manual , 2000 .

[45]  J. Basilion,et al.  Single-nucleotide polymorphisms can cause different structural folds of mRNA. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  L. Duret,et al.  Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  K. Kleene,et al.  A quantitative sucrose gradient analysis of the translational activity of 18 mRNA species in testes from adult mice. , 1999, Molecular human reproduction.

[48]  A. Eyre-Walker,et al.  Synonymous codon bias is related to gene length in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy? , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[49]  P. Sharp,et al.  DNA sequence evolution: the sounds of silence. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[50]  S. Muse,et al.  A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[51]  N. Goldman,et al.  A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.

[52]  Walter Fontana,et al.  Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures , 1994 .

[53]  M. Bulmer,et al.  Reduced synonymous substitution rate at the start of enterobacterial genes. , 1993, Nucleic acids research.

[54]  D. Hartl,et al.  Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence. , 1992, Genetics.

[55]  M. Bulmer The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. , 1991, Genetics.

[56]  M. Kreitman,et al.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila , 1991, Nature.

[57]  J. van Duin,et al.  Secondary structure of the ribosome binding site determines translational efficiency: a quantitative analysis. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  C. Kurland,et al.  Codon preferences in free-living microorganisms. , 1990, Microbiological reviews.

[59]  B. Carter,et al.  5′‐Secondary structure formation, in constrast to a short string of non‐preferred codons, inhibits the translation of the pyruvate kinase mRNA in yeast , 1989, Yeast.

[60]  P. Sharp,et al.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[61]  M. Kimura Preponderance of synonymous changes as evidence for the neutral theory of molecular evolution , 1977, Nature.