Enhancing Training Efficiency and Effectiveness Through the Use of Dyad Training.

The authors examined the effect of inserting observation practice and undirected dialog into the rest interval between practice trials on the learning of a complex task (stabilometer). Training protocols in which learners practice in pairs (dyads) result in increases in learning efficiency, but the critical issue is the effect on learning effectiveness. Three groups of participants (n = 12 in each group) practiced maintaining their balance on a stabilometer. One group practiced individually, and the other 2 groups practiced in dyads in which 1 performer practiced the task while the other observed. In the dyad-alternate condition, participants alternated between physical, observational, and dialog practice on each trial, whereas in the dyad-control condition, subjects completed all trials on 1 form of practice (either physical or observational practice) before engaging in the other form. The results indicated that the dyad-alternate group initially performed more poorly but quickly overtook the individual group, and the performance advantage of the dyad-alternate group was maintained on the delayed retention test. When the different forms of practice were performed consecutively, as in the dyad-control group, acquisition and retention performance was generally poorer than when they were alternated. Those results suggest that one can combine the benefits of physical practice, observation, and dialog between learners in an interactive way to produce an effective and efficient learning protocol.

[1]  M. Weiss,et al.  Modeling Considerations in Motor Skill Acquisition and Performance: An Integrated, Approach , 1989, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[2]  Jeffrey A. Jordan,et al.  A Dyadic Protocol for Training Complex Skills , 1992 .

[3]  L K Tennant,et al.  Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. , 1997, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[4]  Barbara L. McCombs,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: A Phenomenological View , 1989 .

[5]  Robert P. Steel,et al.  A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984 , 1987 .

[6]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[7]  R. Martens Social Psychology And Physical Activity , 1975 .

[8]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  R. Weinberg Goal setting and performance in sport and exercise settings: a synthesis and critique. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  Effects of Affiliation-Related Motives on Swimmers in Individual Versus Group Competition: A Field Experiment. , 1978 .

[11]  L Proteau,et al.  On the cognitive processes underlying contextual interference and observational learning. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Application of Goal Setting to Sports , 1985 .

[13]  A Bandura,et al.  Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: a causal analysis. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  J. Whiting Imitation and the learning of complex cyclical actions , 1988 .

[15]  D. Landers,et al.  Goal Setting in Sport and Exercise: A Research Synthesis to Resolve the Controversy , 1995 .

[16]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Influence of an unskilled model's practice schedule on observational motor learning , 1990 .

[17]  M. Deutsch An Experimental Study of the Effects of Co-Operation and Competition upon Group Process , 1949 .

[18]  M. Chi Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[19]  C. Shea,et al.  Pew (1966) Revisited: Acquisition of Hierarchical Control as a Function of Observational Practice. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  D. Watkins Student Perceptions of Factors Influencing Tertiary Learning , 1984 .

[21]  B. A. Boyce Effects of Assigned versus Participant-Set Goals on Skill Acquisition and Retention of a Selected Shooting Task , 1992 .

[22]  R N Singer,et al.  Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  J. A. Adams Use of the model's knowledge of results to increase the observer's performance , 1986 .

[24]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Construction of shared knowledge during collaborative learning , 1997, CSCL.

[25]  N. Triplett,et al.  The Dynamogenic Factors in Pacemaking and Competition , 1898 .

[26]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[27]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[28]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[29]  Wayne L. Shebilske,et al.  Effects of Group Discussion on Acquisition of Complex Skills , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[30]  R. Singer,et al.  Self-regulation and cognitive strategies in sport participation. , 1992 .

[31]  Stephan P. Swinnen,et al.  Cognitive Effort and Motor Learning , 1994 .