Coping capacities for improving adaptation pathways for flood protection in Can Tho, Vietnam

The planning and phasing of adaptation responses are essential to tackle uncertainties and ensure positive outcomes while adapting to changing circumstances. Understanding the evolution of coping and adaptation responses and their capacities is a prerequisite for preparing an effective flood management plan for the future. The aim of this paper is to determine the effect of coping capacity on longer term adaptation responses in a flood risk management system. The objectives, requirements, targets, design, and performance of flood protection measures will have to be determined after taking into account, or in conjunction with, the coping capacities. A methodology has been developed and demonstrated based on an adaptation pathway approach to account for coping capacities and to assess the effect of these on flood protection measures. Application of this methodology for flood protection measures in Can Tho City in the Mekong Delta shows the effect of considering coping capacity for flood protection measures and the value in delaying the occurrence of tipping points. Coping measures such as elevating property floor levels can postpone the tipping points when dikes are no longer effective. Consideration of coping capacity in the system improves adaptation responses and leads to better adaptation outcomes.

[1]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Adaptive Airport Strategic Planning , 2010, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[2]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  Battling Arrow’s Paradox to Discover Robust Water Management Alternatives , 2016 .

[3]  H. Füssel.  Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons , 2007 .

[4]  Patrick M. Reed,et al.  Cooperative drought adaptation: Integrating infrastructure development, conservation, and water transfers into adaptive policy pathways , 2015 .

[5]  Adrian Cashman,et al.  Managing water as a socio-technical system: the shift from ‘experts’ to ‘alliances’ , 2011 .

[6]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[7]  C. Digman,et al.  Designing for Exceedance in Urban Drainage: Good Practice , 2006 .

[8]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Developing dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a computer-assisted approach for developing adaptive strategies for a deeply uncertain world , 2015, Climatic Change.

[9]  J. Kwadijk,et al.  Using adaptation tipping points to prepare for climate change and sea level rise: a case study in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[10]  Matthias Garschagen,et al.  Risky change?: Vulnerability and adaptation between climate change and transformation dynamics in Can Tho City, Vietnam , 2014 .

[11]  J. Birkmann,et al.  Adaptive urban governance: new challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change , 2010 .

[12]  Pieter Valkering,et al.  A method to explore social response for sustainable water management strategies under changing conditions , 2011 .

[13]  Dimitri Solomatine,et al.  A study of the climate change impacts on fluvial flood propagation in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta , 2012 .

[14]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[15]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  Fit for purpose? Building and evaluating a fast, integrated model for exploring water policy pathways , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world , 2013 .

[17]  K. Reinhardt.  Shaping The Next One Hundred Years New Methods For Quantitative Long Term Policy Analysis , 2016 .

[18]  W. Adger,et al.  Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? , 2009 .

[19]  W. Deursen,et al.  A method to develop sustainable water management strategies for an uncertain future , 2011 .

[20]  Benjamin P. Bryant,et al.  Thinking Inside the Box , 2010 .

[21]  David G. Groves,et al.  A New Analytic Method for Finding Policy-Relevant Scenarios: , 2007 .

[22]  A. Pathirana,et al.  Urbanization and climate change impacts on future urban flooding in Can Tho city, Vietnam , 2011 .

[23]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Adapt or Perish: A Review of Planning Approaches for Adaptation under Deep Uncertainty , 2013 .

[24]  Matthias Garschagen,et al.  Risky Change? Vietnam’s urban flood risk governance between climate dynamics and transformation , 2015 .

[25]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Adaptive policies, policy analysis, and policy-making , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  Flexibility in Engineering Design , 2011 .

[27]  W. Deursen,et al.  Exploring pathways for sustainable water management in river deltas in a changing environment , 2010, Climatic Change.

[28]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Combined fluvial and pluvial urban flood hazard analysis: concept development and application to Can Tho city, Mekong Delta, Vietnam , 2015 .

[29]  C. T. Hoanh,et al.  Sea Level Rise Affecting the Vietnamese Mekong Delta: Water Elevation in the Flood Season and Implications for Rice Production , 2004 .