Integrating health economics modeling in the product development cycle of medical devices: A Bayesian approach

OBJECTIVES Medical device companies are under growing pressure to provide health-economic evaluations of their products. Cost-effectiveness analyses are commonly undertaken as a one-off exercise at the late stage of development of new technologies; however, the benefits of an iterative use of economic evaluation during the development process of new products have been acknowledged in the literature. Furthermore, the use of Bayesian methods within health technology assessment has been shown to be of particular value in the dynamic framework of technology appraisal when new information becomes available in the life cycle of technologies. METHODS In this study, we set out a methodology to adapt these methods for their application to directly support investment decisions in a commercial setting from early stages of the development of new medical devices. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Starting with relatively simple analysis from the very early development phase and proceeding to greater depth of analysis at later stages, a Bayesian approach facilitates the incorporation of all available evidence and would help companies to make better informed choices at each decision point.

[1]  David R. Jones,et al.  An introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessment , 1999, BMJ.

[2]  M. Drummond,et al.  A rational framework for decision making by the National Institute For Clinical Excellence (NICE) , 2002, The Lancet.

[3]  David R. Jones,et al.  Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review. , 2000, Health technology assessment.

[4]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  Capturing user requirements in medical device development: the role of ergonomics , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[5]  Karl Claxton,et al.  An Iterative Bayesian Approach to Health Technology Assessment: Application to a Policy of Preoperative Optimization for Patients Undergoing Major Elective Surgery , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[6]  Jeremy E. Oakley,et al.  Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities , 2006 .

[7]  R. Warburton,et al.  Patient safety--how much is enough? , 2005, Health policy.

[8]  Alan J Girling,et al.  Modeling payback from research into the efficacy of left-ventricular assist devices as destination therapy , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[9]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  A preliminary economic evaluation of percutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of hemiplegic shoulder pain , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[10]  K R Abrams,et al.  Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis. , 2001, Statistical methods in medical research.

[11]  M. Drummond,et al.  Whither trial-based economic evaluation for health care decision making? , 2006, Health economics.

[12]  Richard J. Lilford,et al.  Investing in new medical technologies: A decision framework , 2007 .

[13]  M. Drummond,et al.  The Iterative Use of Economic Evaluation as Part of the Process of Health Technology Assessment , 1997, Journal of health services research & policy.

[14]  Paul Trueman,et al.  Health technology assessment for medical devices in Europe. What must be considered. , 2002, International journal of technology assessment in health care.

[15]  D. Torgerson,et al.  The need for Pragmatic Experimentation in Educational Research , 2007 .

[16]  Martin Buxton,et al.  Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: A Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[17]  David R. Jones,et al.  Hierarchical models in generalized synthesis of evidence: an example based on studies of breast cancer screening. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.