Participative Goal Setting in Self-Directed Global Virtual Teams: The Role of Virtual Team Efficacy in Goal Setting Effectiveness and Performance

The frequent use of global virtual teams for accomplishing organizational tasks helps explain the continued interest in research designed to identify and disentangle the relationships among factors influencing team performance. Participative goal setting represents one factor that may be particularly important in these settings. 52 self-directed global virtual teams, consisting of 318 participants, were observed during the life cycle of a team project in order to examine these critical relationships. As hypothesized, results reveal that virtual team efficacy (VTE) indirectly relates to goal commitment through the participative process of setting specific and difficult goals. In turn, participatively setting difficult goals and the teams' commitment to those goals directly affects actual performance. These findings extend prior research applying social cognitive theory (SCT) in global virtual team research. Implications for theory and practice, as well as opportunities for future research are discussed.

[1]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  An Application of Control Theory to Understanding the Relationship Between Performance and Satisfaction , 1991 .

[2]  Juergen Wegge,et al.  Participation in Group Goal Setting: Some Novel Findings and a Comprehensive Model as a New Ending to an Old Story , 2000 .

[3]  Deborah L. Duarte,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams , 2000 .

[4]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[6]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[7]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. , 1997 .

[8]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Problems, prospects, and proposals for future research. , 1987 .

[9]  J. Graydon,et al.  The impact of individual efficacy beliefs on group goal selection and group goal commitment , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[10]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .

[11]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Team Boundary Issues Across Multiple Global Firms , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[13]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Self-Management as a Substitute for Leadership: A Social Learning Theory Perspective , 1980 .

[14]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[15]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[16]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Efficacy in Technology-Mediated Distributed Teams , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[18]  Brian D. Janz,et al.  Self-directed teams in IS: correlates for improved systems development work outcomes , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[19]  T. A. Ryan,et al.  Intentional behavior; an approach to human motivation , 1973 .

[20]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Gary Garrison,et al.  Research Note - A Model of Conflict, Leadership, and Performance in Virtual Teams , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Эшфорт Блейк,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 2012 .

[23]  Mark H. Anshel,et al.  The effect of goal difficulty and task complexity on intrinsic motivation and motor performance. , 1992 .

[24]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[25]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[26]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  A Typology of Virtual Teams , 2002 .

[27]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Measuring Group Efficacy in Virtual Teams , 2006 .

[29]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  E. A. Locke,et al.  New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory , 2006 .

[31]  Gregory E. Prussia,et al.  A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. , 1996 .

[32]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Group Potency and Collective Efficacy , 2003 .

[33]  Ad de Jong,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Group Potency: A Study of Self-Managing Service Teams , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[34]  I. Zigurs.  Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity? , 2003 .

[35]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[36]  John A Scigliano,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques that Succeed: Deborah L. Duarte and Nancy Tennant Snyder. (2000). 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 256 pages. ISBN: 0-7879-5589-2W01. US$39.95, includes a CD-ROM , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[37]  L. Weingart,et al.  Group goals and group performance , 1993 .

[38]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[39]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal Setting: A Motivational Technique That Works! , 1984 .

[40]  G. Latham,et al.  A Review of Research on the Application of Goal Setting in Organizations , 1975 .

[41]  C. Gibson,et al.  Virtual teams that work : creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness , 2003 .

[42]  Blake Ives,et al.  Trust and the Unintended Effects of Behavior Control in Virtual Teams , 2003, MIS Q..

[43]  Steve H. Barr,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes the Impact of Perceived Loafing and Collective Efficacy on Group Goal Processes and Group Performance , 2022 .

[44]  A. Bandura.  GUIDE FOR CONSTRUCTING SELF-EFFICACY SCALES , 2006 .

[45]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  The Effects of Goal Setting and Self-Instruction Training on the Performance of Unionized Employees , 2000 .

[46]  Dwight D. Frink,et al.  A Review of the Influence of Group Goals on Group Performance , 1994 .

[47]  HoeglMartin,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[48]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology, Second Edition , 2000 .

[49]  S. Bray,et al.  Collective Efficacy, Group Goals, and Group Performance of a Muscular Endurance Task , 2004 .

[50]  A. Majchrzak,et al.  Leading Virtual Teams , 2007 .

[51]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams , 2004 .

[52]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  Team development and group processes of virtual learning teams , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[53]  J. Alberto Espinosa,et al.  Crossing Spatial and Temporal Boundaries in Globally Distributed Projects: A Relational Model of Coordination Delay , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[56]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Technical‐administrative task performance, leadership task performance, and contextual performance: considering the influence of team‐ and task‐related composition variables , 2002 .

[57]  E. A. Locke.  Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives , 1968 .

[58]  W. Dutton.  Society on the line: information politics in the digital age oxford university press , 1999 .

[59]  Jeffrey K. Pinto,et al.  Importance of Goal Setting in Virtual Project Teams , 2007, Psychological reports.

[60]  Kristina Whitney,et al.  Improving group task performance: The role of group goals and group efficacy. , 1994 .

[61]  Raghu Nath,et al.  Role of Performance Goals in Prose Learning. , 1976 .

[62]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Collective Cognition in Action: Accumulation, Interaction, Examination, and Accommodation in the Development and Operation of Group Efficacy Beliefs in the Workplace. , 2007 .