A Knowledge Adoption Model Based Framework for Finding Helpful User-Generated Contents in Online Communities

Many online communities allow their members to provide information helpfulness judgments that can be used to guide other users to useful contents quickly. However, it is a serious challenge to solicit enough user participation in providing feedbacks in online communities. Existing studies on assessing the helpfulness of user-generated contents are mainly based on heuristics and lack of a unifying theoretical framework. In this article we propose a text classification framework for finding helpful usergenerated contents in online knowledge-sharing communities. The objective of our framework is to help a knowledge seeker find helpful information that can be potentially adopted. The framework is built on the Knowledge Adoption Model that considers both content-based argument quality and information source credibility. We identify 6 argument quality dimensions and 3 source credibility dimensions based on information quality and psychological theories. Using data extracted from a popular online community, our empirical evaluations show that all the dimensions improve the performance over a traditional text classification technique that considers word-based lexical features only.

[1]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[2]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[3]  Yiming Yang,et al.  A Comparative Study on Feature Selection in Text Categorization , 1997, ICML.

[4]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[5]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Motivating participation by displaying the value of contribution , 2006, CHI.

[6]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing as a Model for Problem Solving , 2008 .

[7]  Tharam S. Dillon,et al.  Content Quality Assessment Related Frameworks for Social Media , 2009, ICCSA.

[8]  Soo-Min Kim,et al.  Automatically Assessing Review Helpfulness , 2006, EMNLP.

[9]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[10]  Christina Prell,et al.  Community Networking and Social Capital: Early Investigations , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Qing Cao,et al.  Investigating Determinants of Voting for the "Helpfulness" of Online Consumer Reviews: A Text Mining Approach , 2010, AMCIS.

[13]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  E. Hovy,et al.  Modeling and Assessing Student Activities in On-Line Discussions , 2006 .

[15]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities , 2008, Internet Res..

[17]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Stylometric Identification in Electronic Markets: Scalability and Robustness , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Peter H. Gray,et al.  Knowledge sourcing methods , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Max Mühlhäuser,et al.  Automatically Assessing the Post Quality in Online Discussions on Software , 2007, ACL.

[20]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[21]  Lynn R. Kahle,et al.  Source Expertise, Time of Source Identification, and Involvement in Persuasion: An Elaborative Processing Perspective , 1990 .

[22]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Examining the Perceived Credibility of Online Opinions: Information Adoption in the Online Environment , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[23]  Shay David,et al.  Six degrees of reputation: The use and abuse of online review and recommendation systems , 2006, First Monday.

[24]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Estimating the Helpfulness and Economic Impact of Product Reviews: Mining Text and Reviewer Characteristics , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[25]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[26]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Understanding customer knowledge sharing in web-based discussion boards: An exploratory study , 2006, Internet Res..

[27]  R. Kozinets,et al.  The Wisdom of Consumer Crowds , 2008 .

[28]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A framework for analyzing and understanding online communities , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[29]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[30]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer , 1989 .

[31]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Slash(dot) and burn: distributed moderation in a large online conversation space , 2004, CHI.

[32]  Bin Gu,et al.  Competition Among Virtual Communities and User Valuation: The Case of Investing-Related Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..