From Hearing to Listening: Design and Properties of an Actively Tunable Electronic Hearing Sensor

An important step towards understanding the working principles of the mammalian hearing sensor is the concept of an active cochlear amplifier. Theoretical arguments and physiological measurements suggest that the active cochlear amplifiers originate from systems close to a Hopf bifurcation. Efforts to model the mammalian hearing sensor on these grounds have, however, either had problems in reproducing sufficiently close essential aspects of the biological example (Magnasco, M.O. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 058101 (2003); Duke, T. & Jülicher, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 158101 (2003)), or required complicated spatially coupled differential equation systems that are unfeasible for transient signals (Kern, A. & Stoop, R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 128101 (2003)). Here, we demonstrate a simple system of electronically coupled Hopf amplifiers that not only leads to the desired biological response behavior, but also has real-time capacity. The obtained electronic Hopf cochlea shares all salient signal processing features exhibited by the mammalian cochlea and thus provides a simple and efficient design of an artificial mammalian hearing sensor.

[1]  Thomas Gold,et al.  Hearing. II. The Physical Basis of the Action of the Cochlea , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[2]  Wiesenfeld,et al.  Period-doubling systems as small-signal amplifiers. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[3]  B. P. Bogert,et al.  A Dynamical Theory of the Cochlea , 1950 .

[4]  Craig C. Bader,et al.  Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. , 1985, Science.

[5]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  Compressive nonlinearity in the hair bundle's active response to mechanical stimulation , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Mechanical bases of frequency tuning and neural excitation at the base of the cochlea: comparison of basilar-membrane vibrations and auditory-nerve-fiber responses in chinchilla. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Brun,et al.  Period-doubling lasers as small-signal detectors. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[8]  M. Ruggero.  Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea , 1992, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[9]  R Stoop,et al.  Two-tone suppression and combination tone generation as computations performed by the Hopf cochlea. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[10]  Mario A Ruggero,et al.  Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Stoop,et al.  Essential Role of Couplings between Hearing Nonlinearities. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[12]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[13]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Basilar membrane responses to broadband stimuli. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  William E. Schiesser,et al.  Linear and nonlinear waves , 2009, Scholarpedia.

[15]  L. Robles,et al.  Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Ralph Judson Smith,et al.  Circuits, devices and systems , 1966 .

[17]  M. Lighthill,et al.  Waves In Fluids , 2002 .

[18]  E. D. Boer,et al.  Mechanics of the Cochlea: Modeling Efforts , 1996 .

[19]  D. Kemp.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Jonathan Ashmore,et al.  The cochlea , 2000, Current Biology.

[21]  O. Voß,et al.  Zur Theorie des Hörens , 1933, Naturwissenschaften.

[22]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Basilar-membrane response to multicomponent stimuli in chinchilla. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  A. Hudspeth,et al.  Essential nonlinearities in hearing. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[24]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Place code for pitch: a necessary revision. , 1999, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[25]  F. Jülicher,et al.  Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  R Stoop,et al.  Essential auditory contrast-sharpening is preneuronal. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  L. Robles,et al.  Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  O. Hendrich,et al.  Power gain exhibited by motile mechanosensory neurons in Drosophila ears. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.