From Inherent Value to Incentive Value: When and Why Pointless Effort Enhances Consumer Preference

Companies typically use clear fonts and bright pictures in their ads, Web sites, and product-package designs; place their products on easy-to-reach shelves; and emphasize ease-of-usage to make their products appear desirable to consumers. However, we suggest that customers focused on "incentive" value (getting the best product) may instead see products associated with noninstrumental (pointless) effort as more desirable. We suggest that because effort is usually required to get the best outcomes, people looking for the best outcomes also mistakenly presume effort must imply the best possible outcome. Across five studies, we show that highlighting incentive value--for instance, by message framing or by measuring chronic focus or by manipulating situational focus on incentive value--enhances preference toward outcomes associated with noninstrumental effort. We discuss the importance of our findings for understanding everyday consumption decisions and argue for a widespread tendency among individuals wanting the best to infer value from noninstrumental effort.

[1]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[2]  John G. Lynch,et al.  How to Attract Customers by Giving Them the Short End of the Stick , 2007 .

[3]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  The Virtues of Opaque Prose: How Lay Beliefs About Fluency Influence Perceptions of Quality , 2011 .

[4]  B. W. Whittlesea Illusions of familiarity. , 1993 .

[5]  I. Simonson,et al.  The Idiosyncratic Fit Heuristic: Effort Advantage as a Determinant of Consumer Response to Loyalty Programs , 2003 .

[6]  Michaela Wänke,et al.  There Are Many Reasons to Drive a BMW: Does Imagined Ease of Argument Generation Influence Attitudes? , 1997 .

[7]  A. L. McGill,et al.  No Pain, No Gain? How Fluency and Construal Level Affect Consumer Confidence , 2010 .

[8]  A. Sela,et al.  Variety, Vice, and Virtue: How Assortment Size Influences Option Choice , 2008 .

[9]  B. M. Staw The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action , 1981 .

[10]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[12]  Oded Netzer,et al.  The Synthesis of Preference: Bridging Behavioral Decision Research and Marketing Science , 2008 .

[13]  R. Duran,et al.  Communicative adaptability: A review of conceptualization and measurement , 1992 .

[14]  C. Judd,et al.  When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[16]  E. Langer The illusion of control. , 1975 .

[17]  Uzma Khan,et al.  Lusting While Loathing , 2010, Psychological science.

[18]  John G Bullock,et al.  Yes, But What's the Mechanism? (Don't Expect an Easy Answer) , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[20]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments , 1998 .

[21]  Joseph T. McGuire,et al.  Effort discounting in human nucleus accumbens , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[22]  Justin Kruger,et al.  The Effort Heuristic , 2004 .

[23]  Dilip Soman,et al.  The Duration Heuristic , 2007 .

[24]  K. Berridge Pleasure, pain, desire, and dread: Hidden core processes of emotion. , 1999 .

[25]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[26]  D. Ariely,et al.  Wanting, liking, and preference construction. , 2010, Emotion.

[27]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[28]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Issues in Marketing's use of Multi-Attribute Attitude Models , 1973 .

[29]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[30]  K. Palan,et al.  How Good a Shopper Am I? Conceptualizing Teenage Girls' Perceived Shopping Competence , 2006 .

[31]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. , 1989 .

[32]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[33]  D. Bem Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. , 1967, Psychological review.

[34]  D. Bem Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[35]  A. Labroo,et al.  Be better or be merry: how mood affects self-control. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Rashmi Adaval,et al.  Contrast and Assimilation Effects of Processing Fluency , 2010 .

[38]  D. Soman The Illusion of Delayed Incentives: Evaluating Future Effort–Money Transactions , 1998 .

[39]  N. Schwarz Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[40]  David Dunning,et al.  How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Sara Kim,et al.  The “Instrumentality” Heuristic , 2009, Psychological science.

[42]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[43]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice: , 1999 .

[44]  I. Simonson,et al.  Earning the Right to Indulge: Effort as a Determinant of Customer Preferences toward Frequency Program Rewards , 2002 .

[45]  Aparna A. Labroo,et al.  Between Two Brands: A Goal Fluency Account of Brand Evaluation , 2006 .

[46]  M. Lepper,et al.  When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? , 2000 .

[47]  Daniel C Molden,et al.  Naive theories of intelligence and the role of processing fluency in perceived comprehension. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  A. Bechara,et al.  The role of emotion in decision making: A cognitive neuroscience perspective , 2006 .

[49]  R. Dhar Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option , 1997 .

[50]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Of Frog Wines and Frowning Watches: Semantic Priming, Perceptual Fluency, and Brand Evaluation , 2008 .

[51]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[52]  A. Labroo,et al.  The “Name-Ease” Effect and Its Dual Impact on Importance Judgments , 2009, Psychological science.

[53]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Construal levels and self-control. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  N. Anderson,et al.  Combining visual and verbal information in an impression-formation task. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  R. Petty,et al.  The Malleable Meaning of Subjective Ease , 2006, Psychological science.

[56]  Rebecca W. Hamilton,et al.  When Mental Simulation Hinders Behavior: The Effects of Process-Oriented Thinking on Decision Difficulty and Performance , 2009 .

[57]  Klaus Wertenbroch,et al.  The Value Heuristic in Judgments of Relative Frequency , 2008, Psychological science.

[58]  William M. Hedgcock,et al.  Trade-Off Aversion as an Explanation for the Attraction Effect: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2009 .

[59]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[60]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  R. Dhar,et al.  Opportunity Cost Neglect , 2009 .

[62]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Making Products Feel Special: When Metacognitive Difficulty Enhances Evaluation , 2010 .

[63]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation , 2004 .

[64]  Kent C. Berridge,et al.  Irrational Wanting and Subrational Liking: How Rudimentary Motivational and Affective Processes Shape Preferences and Choices , 2003 .

[65]  When the Going gets Tough: How Metacognitive Difficulty Improves Evaluation , 2009 .