A behavioral model of accessibility based on the number of available opportunities

The paper proposes a new behavioral definition of accessibility as the expected number of opportunities “available” for a subject to perform an activity, where “available” means that the opportunity i) is perceived as a potential alternative to satisfy one's needs, and ii) it can be reached given the spatiotemporal constraints of the individual's schedule. A new class of accessibility models is derived in accordance with the above definition, exploiting the strengths of both utility-based and opportunity-based models, and explicitly incorporating spatiotemporal constraints which may limit the availability of perceived opportunities. The proposed model is formulated for both active and passive accessibility, does not suffer from reflexivity issues, supports both trip-based and activity-based formulations, and scales up from individual to spatially aggregated opportunities, taking into account effectively the different ways of perceiving opportunities. Moreover, the resulting accessibility measure has a straightforward interpretation, being expressed in physical units, and is comparable across different locations. Performances of the proposed model in reproducing the active accessibility to cinemas in the Naples metropolitan area (Italy) are compared to those of a traditional isochrone-based measure and a distance–decay model. For this aim, measurements of individuals' perceived cinemas were gathered through a survey, and adopted for the calibration of both the accessibility models. Calibration results show that the proposed model outperforms both the traditional isochrone-based measure and a distance–decay model calibrated against the same dataset, better reproducing both the quantity and spatial distribution of perceived opportunities.

[1]  Yang Wang,et al.  Assessing the accessibility impact of transport policy by a land-use and transport interaction model - The case of Madrid , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[2]  P. Knox,et al.  The Intraurban Ecology of Primary Medical Care: Patterns of Accessibility and Their Policy Implications , 1978 .

[3]  Armando Cartenì,et al.  An activity-based approach for complex travel behaviour modelling , 2010 .

[4]  G R Leake,et al.  ACCESSIBILITY MEASURES AND THEIR SUITABILITY FOR USE IN TRIP GENERATION MODELS , 1979 .

[5]  José Manuel Viegas,et al.  A new approach to modelling distance-decay functions for accessibility assessment in transport studies , 2013 .

[6]  Dong Liu,et al.  Accesibility measures of U.S. metropolitan areas , 1993 .

[7]  E. Cascetta,et al.  Dominance among alternatives in random utility models , 2009 .

[8]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives , 1997 .

[9]  Richard John Sweet,et al.  An aggregate measure of travel utility , 1997 .

[10]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  URBAN ACCESSIBILITY INDEX: LITERATURE REVIEW , 2000 .

[11]  Maria Manta Conroy,et al.  Accessibility Measures and the Social Evaluation of Urban Structure , 1977 .

[12]  W. G. Hansen How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[13]  Bruce Appleyard,et al.  Tracking Accessibility: Employment and Housing Opportunities in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1999 .

[14]  Irene Casas,et al.  Evaluating the spatial equity of bus rapid transit-based accessibility patterns in a developing country: The case of Cali, Colombia , 2012 .

[15]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Accessibility: an evaluation using consumer welfare , 1997 .

[16]  Chaug-Ing Hsu,et al.  Travel and activity choices based on an individual accessibility model , 2004 .

[17]  S. Handy,et al.  Regional versus Local Accessibility: Variations in Suburban Form and the Effects on Non-Work Travel , 1992 .

[18]  T. Straatemeier How to plan for regional accessibility , 2008 .

[19]  D. Halden Using accessibility measures to integrate land use and transport policy in Edinburgh and the Lothians , 2002 .

[20]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Sustainable accessibility: a conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward , 2005 .

[21]  G. Leonardi Optimum Facility Location by Accessibility Maximizing , 1978 .

[22]  H. Miller Place‐Based versus People‐Based Geographic Information Science , 2007 .

[23]  B. Lenntorp Paths in space-time environments : a time-geographic study of movement possibilities of individuals , 1976 .

[24]  Flavia Savigear A Quantitative Measure of Accessibility , 1967 .

[25]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Moving from trip-based to activity-based measures of accessibility , 2006 .

[26]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  The Social Interaction Potential of Metropolitan Regions: A Time-Geographic Measurement Approach Using Joint Accessibility , 2013 .

[27]  C M Guy,et al.  The Assessment of Access to Local Shopping Opportunities: A Comparison of Accessibility Measures , 1983 .

[28]  John W. Polak,et al.  Space-Time User Benefit and Utility Accessibility Measures for Individual Activity Schedules , 2003 .

[29]  W. Recker,et al.  Measuring the Impact of Efficient Household Travel Decisions on Potential Travel Time Savings and Accessibility Gains , 2000 .

[30]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: a decision-making model based on cognitive rationality, stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods , 2015 .

[31]  David M Levinson,et al.  MULTIMODAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION: STRUCTURE AND APPLICATION , 1994 .

[32]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete choice models with latent choice sets , 1995 .

[33]  D. R. Ingram The concept of accessibility: A search for an operational form , 1971 .

[34]  Ennio Cascetta,et al.  Transportation Systems Analysis: Models and Applications , 2009 .

[35]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Disaggregate Attraction-End Choice Modeling: Formulation and Empirical Analysis , 1998 .

[36]  K. Davidson Accessibility in Transport/Land-Use Modelling and Assessment , 1977 .

[37]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Travel Behavior as Function of Accessibility, Land Use Mixing, and Land Use Balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[38]  A. Condeço-Melhorado,et al.  Spatial impacts of road pricing: Accessibility, regional spillovers and territorial cohesion , 2011 .

[39]  Morton E. O'Kelly,et al.  Spatial Interaction Models:Formulations and Applications , 1988 .

[40]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  The impact of opening hours on the equity of individual space-time accessibility , 2011, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[41]  William Young,et al.  A measure of linked-trip accessibility , 1979 .

[42]  Hasan Ikhrata,et al.  Technical Report of Southern California Association of Governments’ Transportation Performance Indicators , 1997 .

[43]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Space-time accessibility measures: A geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration , 2003, J. Geogr. Syst..

[44]  M. Wachs,et al.  PHYSICAL ACCESSIBILITY AS A SOCIAL INDICATOR , 1973 .

[45]  Louis R. Pondy,et al.  Utilization and productivity of the Duke physician's associate , 1973 .

[46]  L. Burns Transportation, temporal, and spatial components of accessibility , 1979 .

[47]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Modeling the Generation and Organization of Household Activity Stops , 1999 .

[48]  R. Vickerman Accessibility, Attraction, and Potential: A Review of Some Concepts and Their Use in Determining Mobility , 1974 .

[49]  Carey Curtis,et al.  Planning for sustainable accessibility: Developing tools to aid discussion and decision-making , 2010 .

[50]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions , 2004 .

[51]  Claudio Ferrari,et al.  Measuring the quality of port hinterland accessibility: The Ligurian case , 2011 .

[52]  J. Weibull An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility , 1976 .

[53]  Fred L. Hall,et al.  Spatial transferability of an ordered response model of trip generation , 1997 .

[54]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  The relationship between opening hours and accessibility of public service delivery , 2012 .

[55]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Network-based constraints-oriented choice set formation using GIS , 1998 .

[56]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Development of Indicators of Opportunity-Based Accessibility , 2011 .

[57]  J. M. Morris,et al.  Accessibility indicators for transport planning , 1979 .

[58]  Giulio Erberto Cantarella,et al.  Multilayer Feedforward Networks for Transportation Mode Choice Analysis: An Analysis and a Comparison with Random Utility Models , 2005 .

[59]  J. Hooper A destination too far? Modelling destination accessibility and distance decay in tourism , 2015 .

[60]  Gordon Pirie,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: A Review and Proposal , 1979 .

[61]  Dick Ettema,et al.  Space–Time Accessibility Under Conditions of Uncertain Travel Times: Theory and Numerical Simulations , 2007 .

[62]  Barry Boots,et al.  Developing local measures of spatial association for categorical data , 2003, J. Geogr. Syst..

[63]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Choice set formation with multiple flexible activities under space–time constraints , 2012, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[64]  Scott A. Bridwell,et al.  A Field-Based Theory for Time Geography , 2009 .

[65]  F. Martínez,et al.  Access: The transport-land use economic link , 1995 .

[66]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Integrating an Activity-Based Travel Demand Model with Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Emission Models , 2010 .

[67]  Michael J. Breheny The measurement of spatial opportunity in strategic planning , 1978 .

[68]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Measuring urban job accessibility with distance decay, competition and diversity , 2013 .

[69]  Peter J. Rimmer,et al.  Macroaccessibility and Mesoaccessibility: A Case Study of Sapporo, Japan , 1982 .

[70]  Dirk Van Oudheusden,et al.  The accessibility of nodes in the Belgian road network , 1978 .

[71]  Marcello Montanino,et al.  A New Measure of Accessibility based on Perceived Opportunities , 2013 .

[72]  Andrea Papola,et al.  Random utility models with implicit availability/perception of choice alternatives for the simulation of travel demand , 2001 .

[73]  E M Voges,et al.  ACCESSIBILITY IN URBAN AREAS: AN OVERVIEW OF DIFFERENT INDICATORS , 1983 .

[74]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Measuring Space‐Time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures , 1999 .

[75]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .

[76]  Tijs Neutens,et al.  Equity of Urban Service Delivery: A Comparison of Different Accessibility Measures , 2010 .

[77]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  Comparison of MATSim and EMME/2 on Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area Network, Canada , 2010 .

[78]  G A Giannopoulos,et al.  DEFINITION OF ACCESSIBILITY FOR RAILWAY STATIONS AND ITS IMPACT ON RAILWAY PASSENGER DEMAND , 1988 .

[79]  H R Kerali,et al.  An integrated model for quantifying accessibility-benefits in developing countries , 2001 .

[80]  M. Kwan Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework , 2010 .

[81]  Juan de Dios Ortúzar,et al.  Modeling Discrete Choices in the Presence of Inertia and Serial Correlation , 2007, Transp. Sci..

[82]  Michiel de Bok,et al.  Accessibility appraisal of land-use/transport policy strategies: More than just adding up travel-time savings , 2010 .

[83]  Armando Cartenì Accessibility Indicators for Freight Transport Terminals , 2014 .

[84]  Daoqin Tong,et al.  Space–time measures of demand for service: bridging location modelling and accessibility studies through a time‐geographic framework , 2014 .