Survey of Requirement Management Techniques for Safety Critical Systems

Safety Critical Systems (SCS) are critical in organizing requirements and that's why needs appropriate requirement engineering. Requirements that are not completely understood and defined are the primary cause for safety related problems. In order to accomplish the task of eliminating chances of mismanaged requirement engineering. We have sorted out approaches of improvised communication between Requirement Engineering (RE) and SCS in Safety Engineering. We have analyzed activities and techniques that should be performed by RE during safety analysis. Moreover, specified tools are explored that are used for analysis. We have focuses on systematic literature review for SCS where main focus is on mandatory safety concerns. Schemes are analyzed as per research questions to identify that which schemes consider these questions in three conditions including satisfactory, partial or not handled. We have selected a large number of articles from different publishers and then identified the articles with duplicate features. Finally we have selected a set of articles after eliminating duplicate ones and then evaluated these schemes as per research questions. We have concluded that requirement completeness, strong need for standard safety analysis tool and compliance with safety standards are mandatory to meet safety requirements during RE process.

[1]  Jose María Álvarez Rodríguez,et al.  An analysis of safety evidence management with the Structured Assurance Case Metamodel , 2017, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[2]  Rob Alexander,et al.  From Safety Cases to Security Cases , 2017 .

[3]  Patrick Graydon,et al.  An investigation of proposed techniques for quantifying confidence in assurance arguments , 2017 .

[4]  Ville Rantala,et al.  Agile Embedded System Development versus European Space Standards , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Soc. Chang..

[5]  Yiannis Papadopoulos,et al.  On Cost-effective Reuse of Components in the Design of Complex Reconfigurable Systems , 2017, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[6]  Yvonne Brunetto,et al.  Safety outcomes for engineering asset management organizations: Old problem with new solutions? , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  A. T. Bahill,et al.  Discovering system requirements , 1996 .

[8]  Alejandra Ruiz,et al.  Model-based specification of safety compliance needs for critical systems: A holistic generic metamodel , 2016, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[9]  Jin Tian,et al.  Safety Is an Emergent Property: Illustrating Functional Resonance in Air Traffic Management with Formal Verification , 2017 .

[11]  Kristian Beckers,et al.  A structured hazard analysis and risk assessment method for automotive systems - A descriptive study , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Chris. W. Johnson You Outsource the Service but Not the Risk: Supply Chain Risk Management for the Cyber Security of Safety Critical Systems , 2016 .

[13]  Huáscar Espinoza,et al.  Reuse of safety certification artefacts across standards and domains: A systematic approach , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Philippe Massonet,et al.  Goal-Oriented Co-Engineering of Security and Safety Requirements in Cyber-Physical Systems , 2016, SAFECOMP Workshops.

[15]  John D. McGregor,et al.  Analysis and Design of Safety-critical, Cyber-Physical Systems , 2017, ALET.

[16]  Julien Delange,et al.  Incremental Life Cycle Assurance of Safety-Critical Systems , 2016 .

[17]  Tongquan Wei,et al.  Fault-Tolerant Task Scheduling for Mixed-Criticality Real-Time Systems , 2017, J. Circuits Syst. Comput..