On-road and laboratory evaluation of combustion aerosols—Part 2:: Summary of spark ignition engine results

Abstract The primary objective was to characterize exhaust aerosols from a small group of in-use, light-duty, spark ignition (SI) vehicles operated on-road, and on a chassis dynamometer. A significant particle signature above background was not measured at highway cruise condition. Number emissions were much higher during acceleration, at high-speed cruise, and during cold–cold starts. Group average fuel-specific number emissions range from 3.9 × 10 14 to 1.0 × 10 17  particles/kg of fuel. Cold–cold start temperatures, driving cycles and vehicular condition influence SI emissions. Elemental carbon was a major contributor to mass emissions measured in chassis dynamometer Unified Driving Cycle (UDC) tests averaging 64% and 34% of the mass emissions for cold–cold and hot start cycles, respectively. Average ratios of cold–cold to hot start emissions were 3.3, 7.6, and 22 for CPC number, filter mass and SMPS volume, respectively. Apportionment results showed that on a weekly weighted basis and on weekdays, the majority of observed particle number was attributed to heavy-duty diesel traffic. Weekend production of particles was attributable to light-duty automobiles. On a per vehicle basis, heavy-duty vehicles produced substantially greater number concentrations. On a fuel-specific basis, heavy-duty vehicles produce slightly higher concentrations of particles than light-duty vehicles. The relative contribution of light-duty vehicles to particle number emissions increased as particle size decreased, for the smallest particles apportioned number emissions were 1.3 × 10 16 and 7.1 × 10 15  particles/kg of fuel for heavy-duty and light-duty vehicles, respectively. Comparison of on-road chase and apportionment results with chassis dynamometer tests in a certification type facility suggests that the latter may underestimate real-world number emissions.

[1]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  Size Distributions of Motor Vehicle Exhaust PM: A Comparison Between ELPI and SMPS Measurements , 2000 .

[2]  Simone Hochgreb,et al.  Particulate Matter Emission During Start-up and Transient Operation of a Spark-Ignition Engine (2): Effect of Speed, Load, and Real-World Driving Cycles , 2000 .

[3]  D. Kittelson,et al.  Characterization of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from a Spark Ignition Engine , 1998 .

[4]  C. Goodfellow,et al.  A Study of the Size, Number and Mass Distribution of the Automotive ParticulateEmissions from European Light Duty Vehicles , 1998 .

[5]  S. Greenwood,et al.  An Investigation to Determine the Exhaust Particulate Size Distributions for Diesel, Petrol, and Compressed Natural Gas Fuelled Vehicles , 1996 .

[6]  Alberto Ayala,et al.  Estimation of Diffusion Losses when Sampling Diesel Aerosol: A Quality Assurance Measure , 2003 .

[7]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  Examination of the Size-Resolved and Transient Nature of Motor Vehicle Particle Emissions , 1999 .

[8]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Source apportionment of diesel and spark ignition exhaust aerosol using on-road data from the Minneapolis metropolitan area , 2005 .

[9]  Simone Hochgreb,et al.  MECHANISMS OF PARTICULATE MATTER FORMATION IN SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES. 1: EFFECT OF ENGINE OPERATING CONDITIONS , 1999 .

[10]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Nanoparticle emissions on Minnesota highways , 2004 .

[11]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  GASOLINE VEHICLE EXHAUST PARTICLE SAMPLING STUDY , 2003 .

[12]  D. Kittelson,et al.  Real time measurement of volatile and solid exhaust particles using a catalytic stripper , 1995 .

[13]  Kenneth L. Rubow,et al.  A Microorifice Uniform Deposit Impactor (MOUDI): Description, Calibration, and Use , 1991 .

[14]  D. Kittelson Engines and nanoparticles: a review , 1998 .

[15]  D. Kittelson,et al.  Deposition, diffusion and adsorption in the diesel oxidation catalyst , 1996 .

[16]  D. J. Rickeard,et al.  Exhaust Particulate Size Distribution: Vehicle and Fuel Influences in Light Duty Vehicles , 1996 .

[17]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  Particle emissions from SI-engines during steady state and transient operating conditions , 2005 .

[18]  K. T. Whitby,et al.  The minnesota aerosol-analyzing system used in the Los Angeles smog project , 1972 .

[19]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Electrical low pressure impactor , 1992 .

[20]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  GASOLINE VEHICLE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS: COMPARISON OF STEADY STATE, FTP, AND US06 MEASUREMENTS , 1999 .

[21]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ELECTRICAL LOW-PRESSURE IMPACTOR (ELPI) , 2000 .

[22]  H. Hansson,et al.  Experimental verification of the particle detection efficiency of TSI 3025 UCPC , 1990 .

[23]  A. Reineking,et al.  Calibration of a TSI model 3025 ultrafine condensation particle counter , 1991 .

[24]  D. Kayes,et al.  Particulate Matter Emission During Start-up and Transient Operation of a Spark-Ignition Engine , 1999 .