Developing Paradigmatic Awareness in University Business Schools: The Challenge for Executive Education

The question of how university-based forms of executive education can effectively contribute to the enhancement of practitioner capabilities using the insights of the humanities remains underexplored. The sustained pressure in business schools to adopt a teaching curriculum and pedagogical approach that appears immediately relevant to the perceived needs of practitioners is overwhelming. Yet, universities are distinct from consultancies or other professional management institutes in that traditionally they provide well-established forums for intellectual exchange and encourage crossfertilization among academic disciplines. We maintain that university-based business schools are uniquely positioned to use their internal university-wide expertise and core capabilities to inculcate paradigmatic awareness among business executives to enable them to enlarge their horizons of understanding and hence extend their decisional possibilities. For us, this is the true competitive advantage of university-based business schools over corporate universities, management training institutes, and consultancies. We maintain that university-based business schools can paradoxically be invaluable to business and industry, not by becoming overly anxious about immediate relevance, but by recognizing that the education and development of the individual as a whole through exposure to a plurality of paradigms and perspectives, is what sets universities apart and makes them distinct from other executive education providers. Their real value to the practitioner world is in offering truly fresh insights and genuine radical alternatives to executive problem situations through novel interpretations that are counterintuitive to received wisdom and best practice.

[1]  David Borgo Free Jazz in the Classroom: An Ecological Approach to Music Education , 2007 .

[2]  J. Bartunek,et al.  A Time for Hope: A Response to Nancy Adler , 2006 .

[3]  Rosalie L. Tung Of Arts, Leadership, Management Education, and Management Research: A Commentary on Nancy Adler's “The Arts & Leadership: Now That We Can Do Anything, What Will We Do?” , 2006 .

[4]  N. Adler The Arts & Leadership: Now That We Can Do Anything, What Will We Do? , 2006 .

[5]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Knowledge for Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[6]  P. Boghossian Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism , 2006 .

[7]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Is there Such a thing as “Evidence-Based Management”? , 2006 .

[8]  Paul A. Boghossian,et al.  Fear of knowledge , 2006 .

[9]  P. Lorange Strategy means choice: also for today's business school! , 2005 .

[10]  Charles Wankel,et al.  Educating Managers Through Real World Projects , 2005 .

[11]  Robert Cheng Huat Chia Book Review: The Aim of Management Education: Reflections on Mintzberg’s Managers not MBAs , 2005 .

[12]  S. Dreyfus,et al.  Peripheral Vision , 2005 .

[13]  W. Bennis,et al.  How business schools lost their way. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[14]  Ken Starkey,et al.  The future of the business school: Knowledge challenges and opportunities , 2005 .

[15]  R. Harrison,et al.  Action learning for management development: Lessons from a leadership development programme , 2005 .

[16]  K. Starkey,et al.  Rethinking the Business School , 2004 .

[17]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The Business School ‘Business’: Some Lessons from the US Experience* , 2004 .

[18]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Managers not MBSs , 2004 .

[19]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Improvised lessons: collaborative discussion in the constructivist classroom , 2004 .

[20]  Richard A. Bettis,et al.  Changes in Graduate Management Education and New Business School Strategies for the 21st Century , 2003 .

[21]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Revising the Boundaries: Management Education and Learning in a Postpositivist World , 2003 .

[22]  W. P. Ferris Students as Junior Partners, Professors as Senior Partners, the B-School as the Firm: A New Model for Collegiate Business Education , 2002 .

[23]  Jonathan Gosling,et al.  Educating Managers Beyond Borders , 2002 .

[24]  Christina T. Fong,et al.  The End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye , 2002 .

[25]  Ken Starkey,et al.  Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research , 2001 .

[26]  D. Tranfield,et al.  The Nature, Social Organization and Promotion of Management Research: Towards Policy , 1998 .

[27]  K. Weick Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis , 1998 .

[28]  The Empire Strikes Out: Lyotard's Postmodern Condition and the Need for a `Necrology of Knowledge' , 1997 .

[29]  S. Pinker The language instinct : how the mind creates language , 1995 .

[30]  P. Berliner Thinking in Jazz: The Infinite Art of Improvisation , 1995 .

[31]  S. Pinker The Language Instinct , 1994 .

[32]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[33]  David S. Gross,et al.  A World of Difference , 1988 .

[34]  P. Johnson-Laird Freedom and constraint in creativity. , 1988 .

[35]  L. Porter,et al.  Management Education and Development: Drift or Thrust into the 21st Century? , 1988 .

[36]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[37]  David Bell The Art of Judgement , 1987 .

[38]  R. White The anatomy of a Victorian debate: An essay in the history of liberal education , 1986 .

[39]  A. Toffler,et al.  The Adaptive Corporation , 1984 .

[40]  J. Mill,et al.  Essays on equality, law, and education , 1984 .

[41]  B. Massumi,et al.  The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge , 1979 .

[42]  M. Masterman Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: The Nature of a Paradigm , 1970 .

[43]  Donald A. Schön Displacement of Concepts , 1963 .

[44]  J. Keynes,et al.  The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. , 1936 .

[45]  A. Whitehead Adventures of ideas , 1933 .

[46]  A. Whitehead The aims of education , 1929 .