Torques generated at the human elbow joint in response to constant position errors imposed during voluntary movements

The stiffness of the human elbow joint was investigated during targeted, 1.0-rad voluntary flexion movements at speeds ranging from slow (1.5 rad/s) to very fast (6.0 rad/s). A torque motor produced controlled step position errors in the execution of the movements. The steps began at the onset of movement, rose to an amplitude of 0.15 rad in 100 ms, and had a duration equal to movement duration. The net joint torque (muscle torque) resisting the step perturbation was computed from the applied torque, the joint acceleration, and the limb inertia. Subjects resisted the imposed step changes with approximately step changes in the net muscle torque. The mean resistance torque divided by the step amplitude was computed and is referred to as the stiffness. The stiffness increased with the voluntary movement speed, over the range of speeds (1.5–6 rad/s). The stiffness increased linearly with the magnitude of the net muscle torque on the unperturbed trials (referred to as “background torque”). The stiffness changed by only 20% when the step amplitude ranged from 0.05 to 0.15 rad. The mechanical resonant frequency (fr), estimated from the average stiffness estimates, ranged from 0.8 to 3.0 Hz. The resonant frequency approximately equaled the principal frequency component of the movement fm. On average: fr = 0.96 fm+0.46. During the fixed, 100-ms rise time of the step, the resistance was not linearly related to the background torque. At slower speeds the resistance was relatively greater during this rise time. However, when the imposed step perturbation was modified so that its rise time occurred in a time proportional to the movement duration (rather than in the fixed, 100-ms, time), the muscle torque resisting the motor during this rise time was proportional to the background torque. When these modified step responses were plotted on a time scale normalized to the movement duration, they all had approximately the same shape. Apparently the muscle viscosity scaled with the stiffness so as to maintain the constant response shape (constant damping ratio). The observed “tuning” of the mechanical properties to the movement speed is suggested to be important in the robust generation of smooth stereotyped voluntary movements.

[1]  P. Matthews,et al.  The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  G. C. Joyce,et al.  The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  P. Rack,et al.  The short range stiffness of active mammalian muscle and its effect on mechanical properties , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  R. Stein,et al.  Frequency response of human soleus muscle. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Houk,et al.  Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  G. Gottlieb,et al.  Response to sudden torques about ankle in man: myotatic reflex. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  F Lacquaniti,et al.  Time-varying properties of myotatic response in man during some simple motor tasks. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  J. Houk,et al.  Dependence of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J. D. Watson,et al.  Effect of vibrating agonist or antagonist muscle on the reflex response to sinusoidal displacement of the human forearm , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Regulation of soleus muscle stiffness in premammillary cats: intrinsic and reflex components. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  S. Cannon,et al.  The mechanical behavior of active human skeletal muscle in small oscillations. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  K. Akazawa,et al.  Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  P. Rack,et al.  The tendon of flexor pollicis longus: its effects on the muscular control of force and position at the human thumb. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  E. Walsh,et al.  Inertia, resonant frequency, stiffness and kinetic energy of the human forearm. , 1987, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology.

[16]  A Ward,et al.  Relative displacements in muscle and tendon during human arm movements. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  I W Hunter,et al.  Human ankle joint stiffness over the full range of muscle activation levels. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  C. Capaday,et al.  The trajectory of human wrist movements. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  T. Sinkjaer,et al.  Muscle stiffness in human ankle dorsiflexors: intrinsic and reflex components. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  E. Hertzberg,et al.  Gap junctions: New tools, new answers, new questions , 1991, Neuron.

[21]  I.W. Hunter,et al.  Identification of time-varying biological systems from ensemble data (joint dynamics application) , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  M. Latash Virtual trajectories, joint stiffness, and changes in the limb natural frequency during single-joint oscillatory movements , 1992, Neuroscience.

[23]  D. J. Bennett Stretch reflex responses in the human elbow joint during a voluntary movement. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  D. J. Bennett,et al.  Electromyographic responses to constant position errors imposed during voluntary elbow joint movement in human , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Theodore E. Milner,et al.  Dependence of elbow viscoelastic behavior on speed and loading in voluntary movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  G. I. Zahalak,et al.  Myoelectric response of the human triceps brachii to displacement-controlled oscillations of the forearm , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  J. Hollerbach,et al.  Time-varying stiffness of human elbow joint during cyclic voluntary movement , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.