Towards an ISO Standard for Dialogue Act Annotation

This paper describes an ISO project which aims at developing a standard for annotating spoken and multimodal dialogue with semantic information concerning the communicative functions of utterances, the kind of semantic content they address, and their relations with what was said and done earlier in the dialogue. The project, ISO 24617-2 "Semantic annotation framework, Part 2: Dialogue acts", is currently at DIS stage. The proposed annotation schema distinguishes 9 orthogonal dimensions, allowing each functional segment in dialogue to have a function in each of these dimensions, thus accounting for the multifunctionality that utterances in dialogue often have. A number of core communicative functions is defined in the form of ISO data categories, available at http://semantic-annotation.uvt.nl/dialogue-acts/iso-datcats.pdf; they are divided into "dimension-specific" functions, which can be used only in a particular dimension, such as Turn Accept in the Turn Management dimension, and "general-purpose" functions, which can be used in any dimension, such as Inform and Request. An XML-based annotation language, "DiAML" is defined, with an abstract syntax, a semantics, and a concrete syntax.

[1]  J. Geertzen,et al.  Dialogue act recognition and prediction : Explorations in computational dialogue modelling , 2009 .

[2]  Elizabeth Shriberg,et al.  Meeting Recorder Project: Dialog Act Labeling Guide , 2004 .

[3]  David R. Traum,et al.  CONVERSATION ACTS IN TASK‐ORIENTED SPOKEN DIALOGUE , 1992, Comput. Intell..

[4]  Harry Bunt,et al.  The independence of dimensions in multidimensional dialogue act annotation , 2009, HLT-NAACL.

[5]  David Traum,et al.  The Information State Approach to Dialogue Management , 2003 .

[6]  Harry Bunt,et al.  Multifunctionality and multidimensional dialogue semantics , 2009 .

[7]  Nancy Ide,et al.  International Standard for a Linguistic Annotation Framework , 2003, Natural Language Engineering.

[8]  Kôiti Hasida,et al.  Semantic annotation framework (SemAF), Part 2: Dialogue acts. ISO Draft International Standard ISO 24617-2:2010 , 2010 .

[9]  E. Maier,et al.  Dialogue Acts in VERBMOBIL , 1995 .

[10]  Harry Bunt,et al.  The DIT++ taxanomy for functional dialogue markup , 2009 .

[11]  Harry Bunt,et al.  Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue , 2000, Natural Language Processing.

[12]  Mark G. Core,et al.  Coding Dialogs with the DAMSL Annotation Scheme , 1997 .

[13]  Jens Allwood,et al.  An activity-based approach to pragmatics , 2000, Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue.

[14]  Harry Bunt,et al.  Towards Multimodal Content Representation , 2009, ArXiv.

[15]  Jean Carletta,et al.  HCRC dialogue structure coding manual , 1995 .

[16]  Elizabeth Shriberg,et al.  Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL shallow-discourse-function annotation coders manual , 1997 .

[17]  Andrei Popescu-Belis Dimensionality of dialogue act tagsets , 2008, Lang. Resour. Evaluation.

[18]  Barbara Di Eugenio,et al.  The COCONUT project: Dialogue Annotation Manual , 1998 .

[19]  Jens Allwood On Dialogue Cohesion , 1992 .

[20]  Harry Bunt,et al.  A Framework for Dialogue Act Specication , 2005 .

[21]  J. Oberlander,et al.  Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue , 2000 .

[22]  Harry Bunt,et al.  Dimensions in Dialogue Act Annotation , 2006, LREC.

[23]  Harry Bunt,et al.  Dimensions of communication , 2009 .

[24]  David Traum,et al.  Speech Acts for Dialogue Agents , 1999 .

[25]  Harry Bunt,et al.  Introducing Communicative Function Qualifiers , 2010 .

[26]  Jan Alexanderssony,et al.  Dialogue acts in VERBMOBIL-2 , 1997 .

[27]  Harry Bunt,et al.  Multifunctionality in dialogue , 2011, Comput. Speech Lang..

[28]  Chung Hee Hwang,et al.  The TRAINS project: a case study in building a conversational planning agent , 1994, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[29]  Andrei Popescu-Belis,et al.  Dialogue Acts: One or More Dimensions? , 2007 .

[30]  Harry Bunt,et al.  Designing an Open, Multidimensional Dialogue Act Taxonomy , 2006 .

[31]  Harry Bunt,et al.  Dialogue pragmatics and context specification , 2000, Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue.

[32]  Harry Bunt,et al.  Context and Dialogue Control , 1994 .

[33]  Andrei Popescu-Belis An empirical analysis of large corpora , 2008 .