Non-standard bone simulation: interactive numerical analysis by computational steering

Numerous numerical methods have been developed in an effort to accurately predict stresses in bones. The largest group are variants of the h-version of the finite element method (h-FEM), where low order Ansatz functions are used. By contrast, we3 investigate a combination of high order FEM and a fictitious domain approach, the finite cell method (FCM). While the FCM has been verified and validated in previous publications, this article proposes methods on how the FCM can be made computationally efficient to the extent that it can be used for patient specific, interactive bone simulations. This approach is called computational steering and allows to change input parameters like the position of an implant, material or loads and leads to an almost instantaneous change in the output (stress lines, deformations). This direct feedback gives the user an immediate impression of the impact of his actions to an extent which, otherwise, is hard to obtain by the use of classical non interactive computations. Specifically, we investigate an application to pre-surgical planning of a total hip replacement where it is desirable to select an optimal implant for a specific patient. Herein, optimal is meant in the sense that the expected post-operative stress distribution in the bone closely resembles that before the operation.

[1]  C. Mazel,et al.  [Value of preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty]. , 2002, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[2]  André Borrmann,et al.  Collaborative Computational Steering: Interactive collaborative design of ventilation and illumination of operating theatres , 2008 .

[3]  Karsten Schwan,et al.  High performance computational steering of physical simulations , 1997, Proceedings 11th International Parallel Processing Symposium.

[4]  H. Skinner,et al.  Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: use of different densitometric measures. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  L. Joskowicz,et al.  A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  R. Leppek,et al.  Zahnimplantattestung am In-vivo-Finite-Elemente-Modell - Testing of Dental Implants Using an in vivo Finite Element Model , 2000 .

[7]  J. Keyak,et al.  Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  H Weinans,et al.  Trends of mechanical consequences and modeling of a fibrous membrane around femoral hip prostheses. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Patient-specific finite element analysis of the human femur--a double-blinded biomechanical validation. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Zdenek Horak,et al.  Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  M. Müller,et al.  The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty , 1998 .

[12]  Ellen Kuhl,et al.  Computational modeling of hip replacement surgery: Total hip replacement vs. hip resurfacing , 2005 .

[13]  D. Schillinger,et al.  An unfitted hp-adaptive finite element method based on hierarchical B-splines for interface problems of complex geometry , 2011 .

[14]  Ernst Rank,et al.  The finite cell method for three-dimensional problems of solid mechanics , 2008 .

[15]  Olaf Schenk,et al.  Solving unsymmetric sparse systems of linear equations with PARDISO , 2004, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[16]  Monica Carfagni,et al.  Hippin: a semiautomatic computer program for selecting hip prosthesis femoral components , 2000, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[17]  N Verdonschot,et al.  Mechanical effects of stem cement interface characteristics in total hip replacement. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  Paul J. Zhang,et al.  Essentials in Bone and Soft-Tissue Pathology: ` , 2010 .

[19]  B. van Rietbergen,et al.  COMPUTATIONAL STRATEGIES FOR ITERATIVE SOLUTIONS OF LARGE FEM APPLICATIONS EMPLOYING VOXEL DATA , 1996 .

[20]  Rüdiger Westermann,et al.  Computational Steering for Patient-Specific Implant Planning in Orthopedics , 2008, VCBM.

[21]  Rüdiger Westermann,et al.  Stress Tensor Field Visualization for Implant Planning in Orthopedics , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[22]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Principles of computerized tomographic imaging , 2001, Classics in applied mathematics.

[23]  Paul J. Zhang,et al.  Comprar Essentials in Bone and Soft Tissue Pathology | McCarthy, Edward F. | 9780387898445 | Springer , 2009 .

[24]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Finite cell method , 2007 .

[25]  Thomas Eickermann,et al.  Collaborative Interactivity in Parallel HPC Applications , 2010 .

[26]  Jack J. Dongarra,et al.  Algorithm 679: A set of level 3 basic linear algebra subprograms: model implementation and test programs , 1990, TOMS.

[27]  E. Süli,et al.  An introduction to numerical analysis , 2003 .

[28]  Christoph van Treeck,et al.  Computational steering on distributed systems: Indoor comfort simulations as a case study of interactive CFD on supercomputers , 2007, Int. J. Parallel Emergent Distributed Syst..

[29]  H.W.J. Huiskes,et al.  Basic orthopaedic biomechanics and mechano-biology , 2005 .

[30]  Subrata Saha,et al.  Application of the finite element method in orthopedic implant design. , 2009, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.

[31]  Julius Wolff,et al.  The Classic: On the Inner Architecture of Bones and its Importance for Bone Growth , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  Ernst Rank,et al.  The finite cell method for bone simulations: verification and validation , 2012, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[33]  M Lengsfeld,et al.  [Testing dental implants with an in vivo finite element model]. , 2000, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[34]  E. Rank,et al.  Organizing a p-Version Finite Element Computation by an Octree-Based Hierarchy , 2005 .

[35]  Zhengxiong Yang,et al.  The Finite Cell Method for Geometry-Based Structural Simulation , 2011 .

[36]  O. Schenk,et al.  ON FAST FACTORIZATION PIVOTING METHODS FOR SPARSE SYMMETRI C INDEFINITE SYSTEMS , 2006 .

[37]  Jarke J. van Wijk,et al.  A survey of computational steering environments , 1999, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[38]  C. Milgrom,et al.  Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  E Y Chao,et al.  Hamstrings cocontraction reduces internal rotation, anterior translation, and anterior cruciate ligament load in weight‐bearing flexion , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[40]  Wolfgang Plitz,et al.  A model for assessing the rotational stability of uncemented femoral implants , 2001, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.