The importance of interest rates for forecasting the exchange rate

This study compares the forecasting performance of a structural exchange rate model that combines the purchasing power parity condition with the interest rate differential in the long run, with some alternative exchange rate models. The analysis is applied to the Norwegian exchange rate. The long-run equilibrium relationship is embedded in a parsimonious representation for the exchange rate. The structural exchange rate representation is stable over the sample and outperforms a random walk in an out-of-sample forecasting exercise at one to four horizons. Ignoring the interest rate differential in the long run, however, the structural model no longer outperforms a random walk. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley l Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. Johansen.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COINTEGRATION VECTORS , 1988 .

[2]  R. MacDonald,et al.  Exchange rates, financial innovation and divisia money: the sterling/dollar rate 1972-1990 , 1995 .

[3]  H. Bjørnland.  Fundamental determinants of the long run real exchange rate: The case of Norway , 2002 .

[4]  Myles Wallace,et al.  Forecasting the exchange rate PPP versus a random walk , 1997 .

[5]  Benjamin J. C. Kim,et al.  Cointegration and the long-run forecast of exchange rates , 1995 .

[6]  Sources of Real Exchange Rate Fluctuations in the Nordic Countries , 2001 .

[7]  A. Swensen,et al.  Testing For Purchasing Power Parity And Interest Rate Parities On Norwegian Data , 1998 .

[8]  Ronald MacDonald,et al.  On Fundamentals and Exchange Rates: A Casselian Perspective , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[9]  C. Engel,et al.  The Forward Discount Anomaly and the Risk Premium: A Survey of Recent Evidence , 1995 .

[10]  Mark P. Taylor,et al.  The monetary model of the exchange rate: long-run relationships, short-run dynamics and how to beat a random walk , 1994 .

[11]  Jennifer L. Castle.  Automatic Econometric Model Selection using PcGets. , 2006 .

[12]  R. Mcnown,et al.  Cointegration Tests of the Monetary Exchange Rate Model for Three High-Inflation Economies , 1994 .

[13]  David H. Papell,et al.  The purchasing power parity persistence paradigm , 2000 .

[14]  Kenneth S. Rogoff,et al.  Exchange rate models of the seventies. Do they fit out of sample , 1983 .

[15]  A. Rose,et al.  A Panel Project on Purchasing Power Parity: Mean Reversion within and between Countries , 1995 .

[16]  Mark J. Holmes.  New evidence on real exchange rate stationarity and purchasing power parity in less developed countries. , 2001 .

[17]  S. Johansen,et al.  Testing structural hypotheses in a multivariate cointegration analysis of the PPP and the UIP for UK , 1992 .

[18]  Apostolos Serletis,et al.  Breaking Trend Functions in Real Exchange Rates: Evidence from Seventeen OECD Countries , 1997 .

[19]  Dieter Nautz,et al.  The Monetary Model of the Exchange Rate , 1998 .

[20]  R. MacDonald,et al.  International Parity Relationships Between Germany and the United States: A Joint Modelling Approach , 2000 .

[21]  Kenneth Rogoff,et al.  The Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle , 1996 .

[22]  Ying-Wong Cheung,et al.  On the purchasing power parity puzzle , 2000 .

[23]  S. Ongena,et al.  Out-of-sample forecasting performance of single equation monetary exchange rate models in Norwegian currency markets , 1999 .

[24]  P. O'Connell.  The overvaluation of purchasing power parity , 1998 .

[25]  G. Chortareas,et al.  PPP and the Real Exchange Rate - Real Interest Rate Differential Puzzle Revisited: Evidence from Non-Stationary Panel Data , 2001 .