An Ontology for G2G Collaboration in Public Policy Making, Implementation and Evaluation

This paper concerns the development and use of ontologies for electronically supporting and structuring the highest-level function of government: the design, implementation and evaluation of public policies for the big and complex problems that modern societies face. This critical government function usually necessitates extensive interaction and collaboration among many heterogeneous government organizations (G2G collaboration) with different backgrounds, mentalities, values, interests and expectations, so it can greatly benefit from the use of ontologies. In this direction initially an ontology of public policy making, implementation and evaluation is described, which has been developed as part of the project ICTE-PAN of the Information Society Technologies (IST) Programme of the European Commission, based on sound theoretical foundations mainly from the public policy analysis domain and contributions of experts from the public administrations of four European Union countries (Denmark, Germany, Greece and Italy). It is a ‘horizontal’ ontology that can be used for electronically supporting and structuring the whole lifecycle of a public policy in any vertical (thematic) area of government activity; it can also be combined with ‘vertical’ ontologies of the specific vertical (thematic) area of government activity we are dealing with. In this paper is also described the use of this ontology for electronically supporting and structuring the collaborative public policy making, implementation and evaluation through ‘structured electronic forums’, ‘extended workflows’, ‘public policy stages with specific sub-ontologies’, etc., and also for the semantic annotation, organization, indexing and integration of the contributions of the participants of these forums, which enable the development of advanced semantic web capabilities in this area.

[1]  M. Doerr,et al.  The CIDOC CRM – an Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata , 2003 .

[2]  Karla A. V. Borges,et al.  Ontologies and Knowledge Sharing in Urban GIS , 2000 .

[3]  Tom M. van Engers,et al.  Using ontologies for comparing and harmonizing legislation , 2003, ICAIL.

[4]  Andre Valente,et al.  Legal ontologies: a functional view , 1997 .

[5]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  ONTOMETRIC: A Method to Choose the Appropriate Ontology , 2004, J. Database Manag..

[6]  Luigi Ceccaroni,et al.  OntoWEDSS - An Ontology-based Environmental Decision-Support System for the management of Wastewater treatment plants , 2001 .

[7]  Tom M. van Engers,et al.  POWER: programme for an ontology based working environment for modeling and use of regulations and legislation , 2000, Proceedings 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[8]  Stephanie W. Haas,et al.  Understanding statistical concepts and terms in context: The GovStat ontology and the statistical interactive glossary , 2003, ASIST.

[9]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Ontologies: A silver bullet for knowledge management and electronic commerce , 2002 .

[10]  Euripidis Loukis,et al.  Computer Supported Collaboration in the Public Sector: The ICTE-PAN Project , 2003, EGOV.

[11]  Joost Breuker,et al.  Ontologies for Legal Information Serving and Knowledge Management , 2002 .

[12]  Enrico Motta,et al.  ScholOnto: an ontology-based digital library server for research documents and discourse , 2000, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[13]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Dialog Mapping: Reflections on an Industrial Strength Case Study , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.

[14]  Andreas Abecker,et al.  Ontology-Enabled E-gov Service Configuration: An Overview of the OntoGov Project , 2004, KMGov.

[15]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  A principled approach to developing legal knowledge systems , 1999, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  A. Valente,et al.  Legal Knowledge Engineering - A Modelling Approach , 1995 .

[17]  L. Thorne McCarty,et al.  A language for legal Discourse I. basic features , 1989, ICAIL '89.

[18]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[19]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[20]  Nikos Karacapilidis,et al.  Integrating new information and communication technologies in a group decision support system , 2000 .

[21]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Law and the Semantic Web: Legal Ontologies, Methodologies, Legal Information Retrieval, and Applications , 2005, Law and the Semantic Web.

[22]  A. Giboin,et al.  Methods for Ontology Evaluation. , 2005 .

[23]  Andy McKay-Hubbard,et al.  Knowledge Management Applied to E-government Services: The Use of an Ontology , 2003, KMGov.

[24]  Frank Fischer,et al.  The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning , 1993 .

[25]  Euripidis Loukis,et al.  A Web-Based System for Supporting Structured Collaboration in the Public Sector , 2004, EGOV.

[26]  Laurence E. Lynn,et al.  Public Management As Art, Science, and Profession , 1996 .

[27]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  On the reusability of ontologies in knowledge-system design , 1996, Proceedings of 7th International Conference and Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications: DEXA 96.

[28]  Ronald K. Stamper,et al.  The Role of Semantics in Legal Expert Systems and Legal Reasoning , 1991 .

[29]  Gangmin Li,et al.  Modelling of naturalistic argumentation in research literatures , 2004 .

[30]  L. T. McCarty A language for legal discourse , 1989 .

[31]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The knowledge-creating company , 2008 .

[32]  John Domingue,et al.  Visualizing Internetworked Argumentation , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.

[33]  L. G. White,et al.  Policy analysis as discourse , 1994 .

[34]  R. V. Kralingen Frame-Based Conceptual Models Of Statute Law , 1995 .

[35]  Martin Doerr,et al.  The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Module: An Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata , 2003, AI Mag..

[36]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  THE FORMAL SPECIFICATION OF A LEGAL ONTOLOGY , 1996 .

[37]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  ODEVAL: A Tool for Evaluating RDF(S), DAML+OIL and OWL Concept Taxonomies , 2004, AIAI.

[38]  Stephanie W. Haas,et al.  The GovStat Ontology , 2003, DG.O.

[39]  R. Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and Cases , 1989 .

[40]  Pepijn R. S. Visser Knowledge specification for multiple legal tasks : a case studies of the interaction problem in the legal domain , 1995 .

[41]  Andy McKay-Hubbard,et al.  Towards an ontology for electronic transaction services , 2002, Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag..

[42]  Lawrence C. Walters,et al.  Public policy analysis: The next generation of theory , 1996 .

[43]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Towards a Core Ontology for Information Integration , 2003, J. Digit. Inf..

[44]  An Architecture for a Flexible Public Sector Collaborative Environment based on Business Process Modeling , 2004 .

[45]  Michael L. Begeman,et al.  gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion , 1988, CSCW '88.

[46]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  A semantic web primer , 2004 .

[47]  André Valente,et al.  Types and Roles of Legal Ontologies , 2003, Law and the Semantic Web.

[48]  Miquel Sànchez-Marrè,et al.  WaWO: an ontology embedded into an environmental decision-support system for wastewater treatment plantmanagement , 2000 .

[49]  Robert B. Denhardt,et al.  Public administration in action : readings, profiles, and cases , 1992 .

[50]  Miquel Sànchez-Marrè,et al.  OntoWEDSS: augmenting environmental decision-support systems with ontologies , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[51]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  A collaborative approach to ontology design , 2002, CACM.

[52]  R. W. van Kralingen A Conceptual Frame-based Ontology for the Law , 1997 .

[53]  Stuart S. Nagel,et al.  Public Policy. Goals, Means, and Methods , 1991 .

[54]  Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.  The Ontology of Tasks and Methods , 1997 .

[55]  Michael L. Begeman,et al.  gIBIS: A tool for all reasons , 1989, JASIS.

[56]  T. M. van Engers,et al.  POWER: an Integrated Method for Legislation and Regulations from their Design to their Use in E-government Services and Law Enforcement , 2002 .

[57]  R. Stamper Signs, Information, Norms and Systems , 1996 .

[58]  Marie-Noëlle Terrasse,et al.  On the definition of generic multi-layered ontologies for urban applications , 2000 .