Linear dimensional changes in plaster die models using different elastomeric materials.

Dental impression is an important step in the preparation of prostheses since it provides the reproduction of anatomic and surface details of teeth and adjacent structures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the linear dimensional alterations in gypsum dies obtained with different elastomeric materials, using a resin coping impression technique with individual shells. A master cast made of stainless steel with fixed prosthesis characteristics with two prepared abutment teeth was used to obtain the impressions. References points (A, B, C, D, E and F) were recorded on the occlusal and buccal surfaces of abutments to register the distances. The impressions were obtained using the following materials: polyether, mercaptan-polysulfide, addition silicone, and condensation silicone. The transfer impressions were made with custom trays and an irreversible hydrocolloid material and were poured with type IV gypsum. The distances between identified points in gypsum dies were measured using an optical microscope and the results were statistically analyzed by ANOVA (p < 0.05) and Tukey's test. The mean of the distances were registered as follows: addition silicone (AB = 13.6 µm, CD=15.0 µm, EF = 14.6 µm, GH=15.2 µm), mercaptan-polysulfide (AB = 36.0 µm, CD = 36.0 µm, EF = 39.6 µm, GH = 40.6 µm), polyether (AB = 35.2 µm, CD = 35.6 µm, EF = 39.4 µm, GH = 41.4 µm) and condensation silicone (AB = 69.2 µm, CD = 71.0 µm, EF = 80.6 µm, GH = 81.2 µm). All of the measurements found in gypsum dies were compared to those of a master cast. The results demonstrated that the addition silicone provides the best stability of the compounds tested, followed by polyether, polysulfide and condensation silicone. No statistical differences were obtained between polyether and mercaptan-polysulfide materials.

[1]  Barry S Rubel Impression materials: a comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry. , 2007, Dental clinics of North America.

[2]  H. Boyacıoğlu,et al.  Clinical evaluation of different gingival retraction cords. , 2007, Quintessence international.

[3]  Terry E Donovan,et al.  A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques. , 2004, Dental clinics of North America.

[4]  Terry E Donovan,et al.  Current concepts in gingival displacement. , 2004, Dental clinics of North America.

[5]  B. Millar Dental know how: How to make a good impression (crown and bridge) , 2001, British Dental Journal.

[6]  P Millstein,et al.  Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts. , 1998, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[7]  G J Livaditis,et al.  The matrix impression system for fixed prosthodontics. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  K. Basford,et al.  A laboratory study of dimensional changes for three elastomeric impression materials using custom and stock trays. , 1996, Australian dental journal.

[9]  R. Walters,et al.  An effect of tray design and material retention on the linear dimensional changes in polysulfide impressions. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  R G Craig,et al.  Accuracy of addition silicones as a function of technique. , 1986, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  R G Craig,et al.  Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  Cannistraci Aj A NEW APPROACH TO IMPRESSION TAKING FOR CROWN AND BRIDGE. , 1965 .

[13]  G. H. Johnson,et al.  Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays. , 2010, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry (Print).

[14]  A. P. Macedo,et al.  Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials. , 2008, Brazilian Oral Research.

[15]  Steven M. Morgano,et al.  A procedure for making fixed prosthodontic impressions with the use of preformed crown shells. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  Clark Ae,et al.  Elastomeric impression materials. , 1981 .

[17]  E. W. Skinner,et al.  Skinner's science of dental materials , 1973 .